Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Groupe_de_flamants_roses_-_Monastir.jpg

[edit]

  •  Comment Yes, but the dof is in the foreground --Skander zarrad 07:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No issue with DOF, but the picture is grainy and not very sharp, and there are several spots of unclear origin in the sky. It almost looks like it would have been scanned from a paper photo. --Plozessor 08:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Вид_с_перевала_Тахтакарача_на_Шахрисабз.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Amankutan national park. Urgut District, Samarkand Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Уильям Дрейк --Красный 00:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 03:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, beautiful, but blurry and noisy --Plozessor 03:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Plozessor. --Milseburg 15:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor. --Sebring12Hrs 17:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

File:OSV_Adriatic.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination OSV Adriatic --GuavaTrain 21:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Красный 23:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good composition. But the image is over-processed and  Level of detail too low. --Augustgeyler 09:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 Comment Brighten it up a bit and increase the contrast a little and the picture is good. I can't understand the blanket criticism of "not enough detail" or "zu geringe Detailzeichnung“. -- Spurzem 12:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Slightly overprocessed smartphone picture, but borderline. --Plozessor 06:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose It seems to be sharp enough and have enough detail for me. But there's something about the composition and low level of brightness that makes it a bit too bland to be a quality image. Bahnfrend 08:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurring noise reduction combined with oversharpening. --Smial 12:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Slightly overprocessed, level of details a bit low and low contrast / brightness. Could be acceptable with one of these but the combination of all three makes it not QI to me. --Benjism89 17:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 19:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Mallaig_coastal_view.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The coastline at Mallaig, Scotland, as seen from a little ways up a hill. --Grendelkhan 07:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the level of detail is too low here due to intense camera processing. --Augustgeyler 10:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think the level of detail is too low, but I'd prefer the land portion of the image to be a little brighter, even though that might not quite be an accurate depiction of northern Scotland. Bahnfrend (talk) 08:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Brightened it a bit; thanks. Grendelkhan 17:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, level of detail is enough. ReneeWrites 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The brightening is a big improvement. Bahnfrend 07:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)