Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Svetlana Kapanina in Sochi.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination The world champion Svetlana Kapanina carries out aerobatic maneuvres. Air show in the Olympic Park of Sochi.--Sergei Kazantsev 08:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Colours overdone, resulting in white aliasing. Magenta fringes. --Cccefalon 13:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
    Look, please, the same plane. IMHO same color.--Sergei Kazantsev 19:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
     Comment The issue is the white aliasing. I just tried to hint, how it entered the image. --Cccefalon 21:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
    Not absolutely I understand in what a problem. If you mean white color of wings and a fuselage, it insufficiently white because is in a shadow and distance between the camera and object more than 500 m. A smoke IMO is natural white, because it on the sun.--Sergei Kazantsev 09:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
     Support OK for IQ IMHO. Maybe we should discuss, if CC brings himself to a clearly marked decline. --Milseburg 12:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
     OpposeWhite aliasing and magenta fringes. Also disappointed about the unwillingness of the nominator to enhance the image. --Cccefalon 08:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
    New version. Attempt to improve. Better?--Sergei Kazantsev 10:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Unfortunately, this version is worse. --Cccefalon 05:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would support first version. It has some unexpected artifacts by noise reduction, and there is some channel clipping in the bright parts of that smoke trail. But though I often decline images, if they show avoidable clipped (overexposed) areas, I think it is not disturbing in this case. The new version is oversaturated and, as for Cccefalon, worse. -- Smial 11:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
    • Reverted to first version.--Sergei Kazantsev 18:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
      • Thank you.  Support now. --Smial 09:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 21:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Κρήνη Γενιτσάρ Αγά Ηράκλειο 9932.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yenitsar Agha fountain, Heraklion. --C messier 07:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Slightly tilted. --Luxure 09:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not good practice to decline photos for something easy to fix, like tilt, if any here, it's not a completely face-on photo, the pavement is tilted for real. --C messier 10:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I based that upon the wall, unless it is slightly sloped as well? Otherwise I just think of it as insufficient quality. --Luxure 11:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm not really sure if it is really horizontal, but I can give it a try. --C messier 11:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  CommentI dont know if the images is tilted, otherwise good enough for QI imo.--ArildV 15:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --C messier 10:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--ArildV 10:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Σπάρτακος 13:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support What about a cleaning of the graffiti ? --Jebulon 20:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Support subjected to the condition that graffiti are not cleaned ,-) --Moroder 09:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
    •  CommentMy support was unconditional ! Let's accept the (ugly) graffito !😷--Jebulon 20:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Poco a poco 19:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Statua_di_nudo_maschile_con_barba_Museo_Archeologico_Venezia_laterale.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of antique nude male with beard at the Museo Correr in Venice. --Moroder 11:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose It looks like the focus was set further behind the statue, it is therefore unsharp --Poco a poco 19:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree that it is very slightly out of focus, but there's no way this could have been caught if it were shot with a D40 or even a D700. --King of Hearts

04:41, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

    •  Comment I know, but to the best (D800) higher standards ;-)) --Moroder 08:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfortunately, I think there is a wrong focus series here, a pity.--Jebulon 11:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Sunset on Lake Constance.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sunset on Lake Constance --Böhringer 06:12, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Wonderful --Billy69150 06:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMHO, overprossesed, please discuss. --C messier 08:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose with C messier.--Jebulon 11:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I can't see what's over processed here. --Hockei 05:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good. -- Spurzem 21:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much contrast. --C messier 11:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Double vote. --Hockei 19:35, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Its nice and it's artistic licence to overuse the controllers of your processing software. -- DerFussi 06:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Englisch-Gruß-Kapelle (Kirchheim in Schwaben) 01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Catholic Englisch-Gruß-Chapel, Kirchheim in Swabia, Landkreis Unterallgäu, Bavaria --Mogadir 14:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good for QI but IMO the crop at the bottom is too tight. --XRay 14:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, is tilt and perspective problems --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am not a fan of arguing about tenths of a degree, but in this case I agree Jacek Halicki -- DerFussi 11:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs a perspective correction, and unfortunate crop of the fence IMO.--Jebulon 20:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)