Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 20 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Basque Pelota World Cup --Pyb 22:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for the depiction of a single person. Of course it results from the high ISO rating, but nonetheless, the face lost the necessary fine details. Beside that: tilted ccw and some local magenta colour in the G-7 and Nike sign. --Cccefalon 03:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lakshmi Narayan Temple, Bhopal, India --Bgag 19:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City hall of Speyer, Germany --Poco a poco 17:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality but right side is leaning out. --Cccefalon 18:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 20:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trinity church, Speyer, Germany --Poco a poco 17:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 19:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Risan, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro --Poco a poco 17:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Cccefalon 18:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Far view of Risan, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro --Poco a poco 17:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glider winch at True Glider airfield near Aarhus --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ivo Volt, head of Tartu University Press. Kruusamägi 16:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trolleybus Škoda 15Tr #6638 in Bratislava, Slovakia --Ralf Roletschek 11:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Good quality, however perspective correction still has to be done. --Cccefalon 11:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC) nothing here is to be corrected. And i'm dont distort my images --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phlox paniculata, upper side of the old leaf. --Bff 09:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: "Flora Köln" after general refurbishment (North fassade with entrance to conference rooms) --Cccefalon 09:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ononis arvensis in Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. By User:Titmouse --BaseSat 08:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too low DoF, tight crop in the top --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adonis vernalis in the village of Yosypivka, Ulianovskyi raion. By User:Anna Kuzemko --BaseSat 08:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Disturbing blurry white flower in the foreground. Too few contrast of the main subject and also not sharp enough. --Cccefalon 08:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Equus przewalskii in Kiev Zoo. By User:Сарапулов --BaseSat 08:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too tight crop on bottom. Loss of fine details. magenta fringe. No QI for me, sorry. --Cccefalon 08:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hieracium aurantiacum --Berthold Werner 08:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hieracium aurantiacum --Berthold Werner 08:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Although it is already a very small photo, it is not sharp enough for a close up of a flower. --Cccefalon 08:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Severn Tunnel Junction railway station. Mattbuck 06:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Highland cattle in Dutch national park --Uberprutser 06:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support nice --A.Savin 12:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Feldthurns in South Tyrol --Moroder 05:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flew into a swampy landscape.
Famberhorst 04:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Flew into a swampy landscape.
-
- Nomination Bud of a Snapdragon (Antirrhinum).
Famberhorst 04:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 06:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Bud of a Snapdragon (Antirrhinum).
-
- Nomination Comics artist Nicolas Mahler --Tsui 02:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Filmmaker Christiana Perschon --Tsui 02:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grazing cows on an old sea dike --Uberprutser 23:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Mooooo! --Cccefalon 06:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The tower buildings at the Hafenspitze in Düsseldorf at sunset --Martin Kraft 20:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion nice picture! --Indeedous 10:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination white E-Bike "Feldmeier" --Ralf Roletschek 12:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Left part of the bike (especially back tyre) not sharp. Also magenta CA. Sorry, no QI. --Cccefalon 10:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Umgebindehaus" in Oberoderwitz --Ralf Roletschek 12:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Good quality. Support --Ivan2010 15:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Perspective and sharpness problems, chromatic aberrations; overexposed sky parts; this "promotion" is as careless and disruptive as the nomination itself. --A.Savin 11:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination France, Straßburg, Center of town --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective issue: left side leaning inwards. Bad crop on top. --Cccefalon 04:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dollerup Mill, Northern facade. --Slaunger 20:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too harsh shadow in the foreground. I don't know if I would promote it after partial brightening, but you can give it a try. Also the branches top left should be cloned out. --Cccefalon 01:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Cccefalon, you are right about the shadow, I have already boosted shadows max in my raw converter, and if I boost them more, they will become noisy. It is difficult to get good sun illumination on the facade without shadiws, as it is oriented to the North, but maybe a better time of day could have been chosen, or I could go for overcast (I often pass the place). The branches top left: A matter of taste, but sure I can clone those out. By the end of the day probably not a QI, so feel free to decline. --Slaunger 15:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
--Cccefalon 05:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de Jonval, seen from Château de Pierrefonds, Oise, France.--Jebulon 17:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, though I'd rather used a longer shutter time in favour for a better ISO --Cccefalon 17:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Yes of course, my fault, wrong ISO setting due to a previous inside picture...--Jebulon 19:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
yeah, happens to me frequently, too :) --Cccefalon 05:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Blesle, Auvergne, France --Pline 13:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Good quality but perspective correction needed; right side is leaning in. --P e z i 20:14, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Done--Pline 10:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC) SupportOK, QI now. --P e z i 15:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Parque das Nações, Lisbon, with the Hotel Myriad in the background -- Alvesgaspar 22:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline What is the topic? The foreground? Then I have to decline because of too dark/underexposed. The background? Then I have to decline because of the dominant, too dark foreground. (also: No valid categorization). Sorry. --Cccefalon 10:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Street artist in Prague --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Lisbon, Park of the Nations: sculpture by Japanese artist Susumi Shingu -- Alvesgaspar 21:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Cccefalon 10:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cabot Square. Mattbuck 06:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Park Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 06:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination National Park Drents-Friese Wold. Location Fochteloërveen in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination The nymph Nemausa, allegory for “The Fountain”, is a work of sculptor Dominique Raché (1746 --Dvillafruela 06:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Rather yellow, and I'm not convinced by the sharpness of the top face. Mattbuck 21:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Withdrawn Comment I changed the color balance, but I'm afraid that Nemausa remains a victim of the field depth. Remove it, never mind! --Dvillafruela 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination The nymph Nemausa, allegory for “The Fountain”, is a work of sculptor Dominique Raché (1746 --Dvillafruela 06:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Wasp_July_2013-3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Paper wasp (Polistes dominula) on a Oxeye Daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare). By User:Alvesgaspar --Graphium 06:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeDoF too shallow --Cccefalon 09:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- CommentI beg to differ @Cccefalon: . The shallow DoF is just right to make the bee stand out as the subject of the photo. The yellow centre of the flower also stands out as part of the subject since the bee is feeding on it. The petals are not as important and no need to stand out. Per the "Focus and depth of field" section in [1], I would like to request a second opinion. --Graphium 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad light and too many blurred areas. --Archaeodontosaurus 05:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Colors are blunt due to light. --Siipikarja 11:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
File:2014_Bielice,_kościół_08.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Parts of the wall are overexposed and thus details washed away. Building appears to be tilted to the right. The image would benefit from perspective correction. --Siipikarja 08:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC) - Support Not need perspective corrections, the walls are straight --Christian Ferrer 17:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI. --P e z i 14:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI. --Steinsplitter 13:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
File:2014_Bielice,_kościół_05.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced composition, the subject is too much on the left. Also, wall details are overexposed. Jacek Halicki, you might want to try to lock the white balance to a brighter spot of the picture when shooting and then frame the subject using the locked white balance before taking the actual photo. This way you will end up with slightly underexposed images, but it's much easier to fix underexposure than overexposure in post processing. --Siipikarja 08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC) - Support QI --Christian Ferrer 17:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support ql --Steinsplitter 11:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)