Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 19 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bahnlinie-Schlüsselfeld-P6055918.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Railway Track towards Frensdorf in Wingersdorf --Ermell 12:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Slight green CA in the trees in places. Fixable? --Peulle 13:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support. I don't see CAs? For me the image is o.k. -- Spurzem 21:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I made some annotations. THey are seen as sudden shifts in green colours. --Peulle 23:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment
        Sorry but I cannot find any CA there.Thanks for your review anyway--~~~~ --Ermell 08:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Moving to CR, let's get some opinions. --Peulle 17:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
          •  Comment These are no CA, but probably artifacts either by sharpening methods or by darkening the blue sky. The least would also explain the somewhat stronger noise in the sky. -- Smial 09:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --PetarM 18:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support The color of the sky is a little bit strange, but I know similar conditions all too well, so I know how difficult it is to deal with bright blueish-white skies. Overall good. --Dirtsc 06:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Plassy shipwreck 2016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination MV Plassy shipwreck in Inisheer island. --Triton 23:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 02:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fixable magenta CA. Also vanishing sharpness in the left and right third of the photo (seems to be a problem of wide angle lens) --Cccefalon 06:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Pixelpeeping there is some CA, but it is not really disturbing in 100% view. But the sharpness is not sufficient. A wide angle converter used? -- Smial 08:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! No, no converter used...nothing more than showed in the metadata. :/ (What means CA?) Triton (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
CA means "chromatic aberrations". Easy to fix, thats why I usually ask to remove it thoroughly. --Cccefalon 11:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, under the boat, got it! Triton 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Also the antenna/rods --Cccefalon 13:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Does this one look better for you? At least for the sharpness? Triton (talk) 21:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
It would be very kind to not just ignoring questions and deleting candidate automatically. To be honest I find this selection process already frustrating enough for any non professional photographer (or at least non specialist). Thank you. @A.Savin, Cccefalon, Smial, Hubertl, and Dschwen:
Tell me what I could do better, @Triton: ! Nothing will be deleted automatically, I just waited for finally declining until the last disputant - in this case Cccefalon - may reply. It is an open process in this special case, therefore I waited. But normaly you have the option to go directly to the discussion page of anyone or use the {{ping}}. I´m just an unpaid volunteer like everyone else here. --Hubertl 21:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 09:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)