Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 11 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mezquita_Ahmet_Bey,_Razgrad,_Bulgaria,_2016-05-27,_DD_32.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ahmet Bey Mosque, Razgrad, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 13:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The sky looks blown. Overexposed? --Peulle 13:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, sky is OK --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support It is not a beautiful blue sky, but a grey natural one. Poco did everything to make a Q1photo under these weather conditions --Michielverbeek 07:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support "Blown out" is not a question of taste. It is necessary to use the histogram to make such a decision. However, the histo of Poco's image shows no signs of blown out or tonemapped parts. --Cccefalon 12:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Indeed it was IMHO just cloudy. For me the red line is when the overexposure does "bite" the silhoutte of other subjects like buildings, foliage, roofs, etc. which is definitely not the case here Poco a poco 18:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaňk_(rozhledna)_-_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination watchtower Kaňk near Kutna Hora --SimcaCZE 07:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perspective issues, CAs, strange composition (as I do not understand the description, I do not understand what the motif is) --Uoaei1 09:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support lets discuss, description is correct. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distorted. --Cccefalon 11:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Seriously distorted. When I'm looking to this photo my head goes from up to down and from left to right. --Michielverbeek 06:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 05:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

File:20160526_Fotoprojekt_Oesterreichischer_Film_Claudia_Larcher_IMG_5653_LR10_by_Stepro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Claudia Larcher, Austrian visual artist and filmmaker --Stepro 01:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, unnecessarily cropped head --A.Savin 13:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support In this special case, a crop at the head can be part of composition to focus the rest of the face. Therefore it´s ok for me. --Hubertl 06:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

File:13-06-27-breda-by-RalfR-083.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Breda, Niederlande, 2013 --Ralf Roletschek 07:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. I support this photo because it is a landscape and not an architectural photo which is requested by guidelines to be corrected in regard of the vertical lines which as I understand Ralf refuses to do --Moroder 12:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 07:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Borderline, but just on the side of support. It's fairly good in depth and sharpness, which is hard to do in a shot like this. Small perspective problems perhaps, but overall quite good quality. --Peulle 11:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A perspective correction of this image would not lead to absurd distortion and is therefore recommended. -- Smial 12:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective distortion, + dust spot in the sky (left), + magenta fringe to be corrected.--Jebulon 08:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Alchemist-hp 15:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC) P.S: @Jebulon + Smial + Michielverbeek: new version is uploaded!
  •  Support (Perspective+dust spot fixed) --Tsungam 15:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Indeed, it is looking better, a week support --Michielverbeek 06:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

File:N529B_Fifi_MD4.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Number 4 engine ("Betty") N529B B-29A "Fifi" --Acroterion 16:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Very good quality. --DarwIn 16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree; several of the propeller blades are very badly cropped and it's very distracting. Sending to CR for discussion and further opinions. --Peulle 22:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment They're all cropped on purpose to emphasize the engine nacelle, which is the picture's subject. There's a separate file File:N529B Fifi MD1.jpg if you like propeller blades, it's a less interesting composition though. Acroterion 23:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop fits the subject.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others.--Jebulon 08:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others ;-) -- Smial 10:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)