Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 10 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Stegø Mill --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cumulus clouds viewed from above, Spain -- Alvesgaspar 21:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eiffel Tower as seen from the Pont Mirabeau (by DXR) --Paris 16 21:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two dogs being friends in playful wrestling --Kreuzschnabel 21:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel at Schönbronn Farm, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany --Kreuzschnabel 21:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a barn in Dudzele (Belgium) -- MJJR 20:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vercingetorix, monumental statue by Aimé Millet in Alise-Sainte-Reine, France. --Myrabella 19:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gelendzhik, lighthouse --Alexxx1979 17:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The central building of the École Militaire Complex in the 7th arrondissement of Paris at dusk. --DXR 17:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madrid, portal of the Curch of Corpus Christi, or Carboneras -- Alvesgaspar 16:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pedal boat rental in the nature reserve "Seebucht Hohe Niemen", Haltern am See, Germany --XRay 16:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madrid, Plaza Mayor. Equestrian statue of Filipe II of Spain -- Alvesgaspar 14:09, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madrid, exterior bronze door of the Almudena Cathedral -- Alvesgaspar 14:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Much lower resolution than you would expect from pixel count. Something went wrong while resampling? --Till.niermann 16:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC) -- No resampling at all. You don't seem to know what you are talking about. Maybe you are referring to jpeg compressure -- Alvesgaspar 19:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Alvesgaspar, do you really think the comment is wrong? I do also see weird blocking that certainly doesn't look like normal D800 image quality... --DXR 21:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC) -- OK, thank you, I will se what happened. But the problem has nothing to do with resampling -- Alvesgaspar 22:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madrid,view to the Edificio España and Plaza de Triente from southwest -- Alvesgaspar 14:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Abbey of Fontenay, Burgondy, France. --Myrabella 13:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reclining Buddha statue, Wat Pho, Bangkok, Thailand --Poco a poco 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 14:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Souq Waqif, Doha, Qatar --Poco a poco 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Naples, Chiostri di Santa Chiara --Berthold Werner 09:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Puerta de alcalá, Madrid -- Alvesgaspar 09:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of Edificio España. Plaza de Oriente, Madrid. -- Alvesgaspar 09:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Fortaleza in La Gomera --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 10:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roque Agando in La Gomera --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Maathavan 10:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deesis mosaic, Hagia Sophia, Istanbul --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. I am very Interested in the technical details of how the pictures were taken. Could you please specify them in the description? Thanks --Moroder 16:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceramic tiles, Hagia Sophia, Istanbul --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blurry, detail in left part missing, low DoF --Poco a poco 18:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Both were on purpose, but I see your point. --Till.niermann 20:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Florian church in Feldthurns in South Tyrol --Moroder 06:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Herd of horses; Wildpferdefang 2014, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 06:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Great photo, DoF could be slightly larger. --NorbertNagel 06:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti near European Central Bank (EZB), Frankfurt Main Germany. --NorbertNagel 06:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti near European Central Bank (EZB), Frankfurt Main Germany. --NorbertNagel 06:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support good --Christian Ferrer 06:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti near European Central Bank (EZB), Frankfurt Main Germany. --NorbertNagel 06:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pine forest of Sète --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entry ot the Wildpferdebahn; Wildpferdefang 2014, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 05:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Philippine sea snail, Gingicithara cylindrica --Llez 05:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Park Weerribben-Wieden. Trees Group Area Weerribben.
Famberhorst 04:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion I think it's a bit tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Okay now?
Famberhorst 17:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Support yes --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination National Park Weerribben-Wieden. Trees Group Area Weerribben.
-
- Nomination White-legged Damselfly (Platycnemis pennipes), female, Chemnitz, Germany --LC-de 22:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti near European Central Bank (EZB), Frankfurt Main,Germany. --NorbertNagel 22:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 16:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti near European Central Bank (EZB), Frankfurt Main,Germany. --NorbertNagel 22:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Muránska planina, Slovakia - sunrise in Nižná Kľaková --Pudelek 14:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --NorbertNagel 06:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mavrovo Lake, Macedonia --Poco a poco 12:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old city of Dubrovnik, Croatia --Poco a poco 12:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turkish Airlines Airbus A330 landing at London Heathrow. By User:Arpingstone --Gyrostat 17:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Towing vehicle at the Airfield Borkenberge, Lüdinghausen, Germany --XRay 16:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 06:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pflersch Tribulaun peak (Elevation 3,097 m) from SW in spring in Pflersch in South Tyrol --Moroder 11:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Double nomination--Moroder 11:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Nomination The Pflersch Tribulaun peak (Elevation 3,097 m) from SW in spring in Pflersch in South Tyrol --Moroder 11:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kiev. Kiev Pechersk Lavra. Refectory Church --Alexxx1979 19:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Reluctantly because of the overexposed areas and the cut woman ;-) --Moroder 11:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Peter and Paul church, Oberammergau, Bavaria, Germany --Poco a poco 18:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ivan2010 16:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)*
Support Very strange, but very interesting (I know the place, but did not see it like that !). I like this very much, congratulations.--Jebulon 21:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Esja, near Reykjavík by User:Simisa --Reykholt 16:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 21:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Zantedeschia aethiopica (white arum).
Famberhorst 15:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Zantedeschia aethiopica (white arum).
-
- Nomination Sviatohirsk. Sviatohirsk Lavra (Sviatohirsk Cave Monastery) --Alexxx1979 15:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Myrabella 14:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Long exposure of the Schronbach waterfall near the Sylvenstein reservoir. The Waterfall is part of the protected landscape area Lake Sylvenstein (LSG-00341.01). View to the upper part (above the street). --Mummelgrummel 15:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Art Pavillon, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 08:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 07:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmhouse N. 5 in Feldthurns in South Tyrol --Moroder 22:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Örebro teater (theater). --ArildV 02:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Tilted. Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good light and focus.--Peulle 13:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Done New version with small tilt correction.--ArildV 19:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Örebro teater (theater). --ArildV 02:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren --Pleclown 11:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Bad crop on the left due to the blue pole. Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose not done --Christian Ferrer 03:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren --Pleclown 11:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings in Wadköping, a open air museum in Örebro, Sweden. To the right, Borgarhuset a historic wooden houses from the 1600s. --ArildV 01:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Leaning in on the left. Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion
Done--ArildV 19:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Seems ok
Support --Christian Ferrer 03:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Buildings in Wadköping, a open air museum in Örebro, Sweden. To the right, Borgarhuset a historic wooden houses from the 1600s. --ArildV 01:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peningagjá, Thingvellir, Iceland by User:Simisa. --Reykholt 09:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Purple CA (see note) --Christian Ferrer 05:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose not done --Christian Ferrer 03:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Chaffinch (fringilla coelebs) male --Charlesjsharp 16:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Review It look a bit overexposed (white areas seems burned out) --Christian Ferrer 22:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Bognor Regis MMB 14 Aldwick Beach.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Aldwick Beach, Sussex. Mattbuck 07:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark at left, motion blur on clouds --Daniel Case 05:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
It was a 15-second exposure, intentionally! While I'm happy to believe this isn't QI, motion blur is not a good reason for it. Mattbuck 07:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Oppose unsharp and posterizarion Christian Ferrer 17:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:30th_St._Moritz_Polo_World_Cup_on_Snow_-_20140202_-_BMW_vs_Deutsche_Bank_5.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank --Pleclown 11:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Crop too tight at top --Christian Ferrer 22:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
This type of composition (cut stick) is quite common in polo photography. --Pleclown 11:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Crystal_cube_sunny.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Crystal Cube in Fiss, Tyrol, Austria. --Danbu14 09:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 10:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
I disagree Tilted --Moroder 06:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
-Moroder is right. I corrected the tilt: I think it could be acceptable now, but it is not perfect. Other opinions? --Sputniktilt 22:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Support--Moroder 12:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Of course the reflection is very good and interesting, but I think the crop is too tight.--Jebulon 21:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed the tilt, better now? --Danbu14 21:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Support I think it's good enough now. --Lewis Hulbert 20:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Mondorff_Foyer_socio-éducatif_L'Altbach.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Socio-cultural centre in Mondorff, France --Cayambe 08:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC).
Oppose Lots of noise or artefacts especially on the roof, on the wooden boards, and on the shadowed areas --A.Savin 13:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but I would like to hear a second opinion here. --Cayambe 15:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I'm afraid A.Savin is right (anyway, I agree with him). Additionally, Remember: I don't know about the "threshold of originality", but there is no FoP in France...--Jebulon 15:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Green shield bug (Palomena prasina).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Green shield bug (Palomena prasina) --Charlesjsharp 09:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not in focus. --Mattbuck 22:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
other opinions pleae --Charlesjsharp 09:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Oppose Insufficinet sharpness due to f/36 -> diffraction blurr. --NorbertNagel 21:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Good colour and light, but slightly blurry by head section.--Peulle 11:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Charlesjsharp 13:38, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Stift_Herzogenburg_Nordportal_01.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Northern wing and portal of Herzogenburg Monastery --Uoaei1 21:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Blur and brightening haloes in the left half --A.Savin 11:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Oppose
Info I uploaded a new improved version and ask for re-review. --Uoaei1 13:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Better, but I'd like further opinion --A.Savin 19:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough in my opinion, sorry.--Jebulon 14:53, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I also think the sharpness is a problem. Otherwise a good composition.--Peulle 11:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Junonia_atlites_26052014.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Junonia atlites. --JDP90 15:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose This one seems a bit too soft to me --A.Savin 10:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
The subject is sharp I think. May be you are right. But I don't want to change the status to discuss for my own nomination . --JDP90
No problem, let's put it to CR. --A.Savin 10:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Brooklyn Evening Wallabout Bay.JPG
[edit]- Nomination: Photograph of Wallabout Bay, Brooklyn USA --Sankarshansen 05:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Review Good quality. --Reykholt 21:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
A bit soft, chromatic noise. Mattbuck 23:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Gullfoss rainbow.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Gullfoss waterfall in Iceland in the summer --Reykholt 18:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but poor level of detail considering the small image size (foreground, left part). --Kreuzschnabel 07:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --P e z i 19:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose a nice 2006 picture... Which does not fit no more with the current QI standards, sorry. Sky very noisy.--Jebulon 14:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Jebulon 14:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
File:GulfossCanonInWinter.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Gullfoss waterfall in Iceland --Reykholt 18:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Bit noisy but ok.# --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose A slight blueish cast might be acceptable under the dark blue Island sky, but this kind of blue is just bad white balancing. (I could upload an improved version.) --Kreuzschnabel 07:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Agree to Kreuzschnabel. --Till.niermann 12:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose strong and unnatural blue cast.--Jebulon 21:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:27450_Allermöher_Deich_311_(Hamburg-Allermöhe).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Timber framed historic house in Hamburg-Allermöhe --Dirtsc 17:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose - Blur around the edges. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please let's take a look if the new version is good enough. --Dirtsc 19:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Now it's quite incredibly oversharpened. Mattbuck 22:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please also take note of the posterisation effect in the top right corner. --Sitacuisses 18:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please let's take a look if the new version is good enough. --Dirtsc 19:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Oversharpened, overdenoised, sharpening halo (see the wire on the roof), posterization as noticed by Sitacuisses. Nice light and composition, but sadly not a QI.--Jebulon 14:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment I'm sorry, that was not well done. I resetted to the former version. Thanks for review! --Dirtsc 17:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- weak
Oppose Nice composition, but the quality is just not there. Sorry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please use only normal assessment templates. Any other templates are not recognized by the bot. Thank you.--Jebulon 21:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-60.jpg
[edit]- Nomination bicycle rent station in Budapest --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
OpposeNice composition, but too much overexposure for me. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
SupportSky is of no importance for this image, and the shiny parts are that bright, i don’t see many blown parts. QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 07:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose, per Mattbuck. --VT98Fan 19:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Support Per Kreuzschnabel. Exposure is adequate for the main subject. --Sitacuisses 20:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nice image, but problematic crop: the subject is the bike station, and some of the bikes are cropped out; the station itself is out of focus. Suggest zoom out. Also, image description is inadequate.--Peulle 11:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- weak
Support DOF is obviously intentional. If you have completely covered sky, then this is the light source. This is not the most desirable lighting, if the sky is inside the frame. You can chose between RGB 255,255,255 or RGB 250,250,250 or RGB 240,240 240 etc.... Although I usually decline images with burnt areas, if they are leading to false colours or affect important parts of the subject, in this case the problem is ineglible. -- Smial 06:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Rhododendron Blütenstand rosa.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Better image than the old version which got declined here Mariofan13 15:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood quality. Please provide English image description. --Uoaei1 06:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness and chroma noise --A.Savin 11:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
CommentEnglish description provided. @A. Savin: What is blur except the background and where can you see noise? Mariofan13 13:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but there is no sharpness nowhere, we have chromatic noise indeed, and chromatic aberrations too. Nice flower, but not a QI. Sorry.--Jebulon 14:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- + no identification about the species (please read the rules)--Jebulon 14:41, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
CommentSorry, I'm not a botanist so I don't know the exact species. And where the piture is blurred except the background? Mariofan13 16:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose No identification. Caption insufficient. --Archaeodontosaurus 05:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Dodge_Dart_in_Isla_Margarita.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Dodge Dart in Isla Margarita --The Photographer 05:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Review Good quality. --P e z i 10:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Significant noise. --Mattbuck 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
File:2014_Kłodzko,_most.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 19:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 10:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment IMO image does not have the tilt, see notes Jacek Halicki 21:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
A bit of blur/CA on left, and minor blur on right. Mattbuck 20:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)DoneJacek Halicki 11:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, the blur/sharpening has left sort of after-images on the left. Mattbuck 20:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with Mattbuck, IMO picture is fine --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC) - I think it's ok but can you remove the purple CA on the lamp at left please? --Christian Ferrer 20:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- I can't see CA on lamp, can you add annotations to a file? Jacek Halicki 18:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Yes but after another look I think it is very hard to see (maybe too much!) it is thus acceptable IMO.
Support this version --Christian Ferrer 19:40, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Tower in Taman Sari, 2014-05-19.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tower overviewing the bathing area, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta --Crisco 1492 08:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:Oppose Overexposure and both sides leaning in Poco a poco 20:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Restitched and reworked.Crisco 1492 07:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Better, but the overexposure is still too significant Poco a poco 20:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Dropped the exposure by 0.2, and according to Lightroom there are now no blown highlights worth mentioning.Crisco 1492 06:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Not convinced, fact is that the details are gone. You can go for discussion if you like Poco a poco 20:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Have asked for a discussion and will upload proof of my statement.Crisco 1492 01:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline *This shows four areas which look like they have blown highlights (i.e. the areas with the greatest amount of light, and fairly plain textures), as well as what Lightroom finds blown (in red). The first three, the main parts of the structure and the focus of the image, have texture; the building is simply cleaner there, and the color of the roof tile is already a very pale cream (this can be confirmed by looking at any other image, including the decidedly under-exposed File:Taman Sari Yogyakarta 2009 panoramic.jpg). The last one, the steps, admittedly have more blown highlights, but they are secondary to the focus of the image and even then the blown area is not particularly large.Crisco 1492 10:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Support --Moroder 11:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Softening (denoising) too strong = loss of details (see palms, for instance) and posterization.--Jebulon 14:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't recall adding any more than 10 to luminance denoising, even before downsampling from 18k to 12.5k.Crisco 1492 16:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
File:András_Kállay-Saunders,_ESC2014_Meet_&_Greet_10 (crop 2).jpg
[edit]- Nomination András Kállay-Saunders during a Meet & Greet at the Eurovision Song Contest 2014. --Abbedabb 17:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Perspective not done. --Cccefalon 05:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Done Perspective adjusted. --Abbedabb 09:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Crop not optimal, but ok for QI. --Cccefalon 12:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Done Croped photo. (And added old crop version next to this one) --Abbedabb 14:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment Late insertion is not possible. Has to be nominated as a new version. --Cccefalon 15:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
While the new crop is a better photo, it is significantly more problematic copyright-wise. The old one was iffy about whether it passed COM:DM, but there is no way in hell this one does. As all QIs must be freely licensed, and this one cannot be so licensed, it cannot be promoted. Mattbuck 23:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Probably ok now. Mattbuck 20:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Per Mattbuck.--Jebulon 19:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Now I've blurred the background really hard. --Abbedabb 09:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Support I think the copyright status is acceptable after being blurred. --Lewis Hulbert 16:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)