Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 09 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Praha_Nove_Mesto_Znovuzrozeni.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Dressed-up statue "Rebirth", Prague, Czechia -- JiriMatejicek 12:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The object on the left is disturbing and verticals could be more straight --Moroder 10:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done
  •  Support The verticals are straight now and the object at the left looks good for me. Good image with beautiful colors and good quality -- Spurzem 21:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support  Oppose I disagree --Moroder 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@Moroder: It would be interesting if you tried to justify your negative judgment. The lines are now vertical, and the foreground on the left should not be a reason to describe the image as bad. I see no disturbing object. -- Spurzem 11:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 Comment @Spurzem: I didn't "describe the image as bad" but simply recommended that the object on the left be cropped (as has been done after my suggestion) since requirements for QI are "foreground and background objects should not be distracting". Cheers --Moroder 12:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support --MB-one 12:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks Spurzem. Cropped the modern building on the left per Moroder's recommendation, although not sure if better. --JiriMatejicek 07:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
@JiriMatejicek: I liked the picture with the foreground and the border on the left edge better. But if experts like Moroder think it's bad, we have to bow to that. ;-) -- Spurzem 18:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 19:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Karden,_Moselstraße_27,_Villa_Cornely_(2020-06-03_Sp).JPG_

[edit]

  • Nomination Karden, Moselstraße 27, Villa Cornely from about 1900 -- Spurzem 20:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support --Palauenc05 22:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Far below QI. --A.Savin 00:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@A.Savin: Würden Sie mir bitte erläutern, was „weit unter“ ist? Es muss sehr viele Kritikpunkte geben, die ich gern kennen lernen würde. -- Spurzem 07:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
It is nothing in focus on the picture. See here: [1] --A.Savin 13:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Do you really not see anything in focus? I cannot imagine that you are serious. -- Spurzem 16:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
I am. --A.Savin 17:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 Comment Lothar, benutzt du seit einiger Zeit irgendeine Software (oder Softwarefunktion) zur Rauschminderung? Überprüfe dann mal die Einstellungen, das Bild sieht tatsächlich in den Details ein wenig matschig aus. Wenn es da eine Stellschraube gibt, drehe die ein Stück runter. "Far below" ist natürlich Unfug, aber so wirklich akzeptabel ist es auch für mich nicht. Grenzfall. Weißabgleich ist auch eine Kleinigkeit zu warm/rötlich geraten, aber das ist latürnich auch Geschmacksache, deshalb würde ich nicht abwerten. --Smial 10:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@Smial: Danke für Deinen Kommentar. Mein Programm hat keine Möglichkeit zur Rauschminderung. Ich habe allerdings den Kontrast erhöht und die Farbsättigung ein wenig angehoben, um die unschönen Lichtverhältnisse ein bisschen zu kaschieren. Letzteres war möglicherweise ein bisschen zu viel, sodass das Bild als übersättigt bezeichnet werden könnte; aber da kenne ich Schlimmeres in QI. Und was „Far below“ betrifft: Das gilt möglicherweise nicht nur dem Bild. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 10:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looking at the white ornaments around the signs, there does seem to be some kind of blur, possibly camera shake.--Peulle 20:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@Peulle: I still missed that negative vote. If it hadn't come soon, I would have asked it. But now it's there. It's astonishing how accurately you can spot mistakes. -- Spurzem 22:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 19:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Old_Neptune,_Whitstable.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Old Neptune pub dates from the Victorian era; it is found on Whitstable seafront. --S.Hinakawa 11:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 12:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Right side is leaning in, and maybe too much of the sky. --Tournasol7 13:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It does seem tilted.--Peulle 20:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 19:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Pape_François_Parlement_européen_Strasbourg_25_nov_2014_15.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Visite du Pape François au Parlement européen Strasbourg 25 novembre 2014. By User:Ctruongngoc --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very noise. --Gzen92 09:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Difficult lighting situation. Noise level rather high (Canon @ high ISO... *sigh*), but in this case still acceptable. --Smial 10:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per the above. A bit noisy but overall good quality. --S.Hinakawa 10:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 19:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Pape_François_Parlement_européen_Strasbourg_25_nov_2014_18.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Visite du Pape François au Parlement européen Strasbourg 25 novembre 2014. By User:Ctruongngoc --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very noise. --Gzen92 09:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree on this one. Too noisy and unsharp. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --Fischer.H 08:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 19:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:European_Red_squirrel.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination European red squirrel sitting on a tree in Düsseldorf, Germany, by User:It.deepak --IM3847 08:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Seems fine to me --MB-one 09:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 08:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 08:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The thin branch in the background is a bit disturbing, but where are the serious flaws that prevent the QI status? Noise is well controlled, there is no distracting CA, the sharpness is right on the eye. Only the local contrast may seem a little low, but that's perfectly natural in diffuse lighting. --Smial 09:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 19:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Ахмановское_озеро.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ахмановское озеро --Ele-chudinovsk 07:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of chromatic aberrations, and... is the focus on the foreground?--Peulle 08:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much CA. --Fischer.H 08:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 19:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Catedral_del_Ártico,_Tromsø,_Noruega,_2019-09-04,_DD_13-15_HDR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Arctic Cathedral, Tromsø, Norway --Poco a poco 13:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Noisy --Moroder 05:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Noise reduced --Poco a poco 10:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Moroder 19:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not yet, the chandeliers look very distorted to me. --Puldarwind 16:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
    Puldarwind: ✓ fixed Poco a poco 10:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry Poco but the people are not sharp enough. Olivier LPB 14:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The stained glass window in the background is tilted. All in all, the extreme wide-angle perspective does not seem to me to be appropriate for the object. --Smial 22:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 19:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)