Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 07 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) of the falconry center at Riegersburg Castle --Uoaei1 03:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eric Guth, OPTIC 2019. --King of Hearts 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erin Babnik, OPTIC 2019. --King of Hearts 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination John Isaac, OPTIC 2019. --King of Hearts 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ron Magill, OPTIC 2019. --King of Hearts 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hell Gate Bridge and the East River, viewed from the RFK bridge (panorama) --Rhododendrites 02:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hell Gate Bridge and the East River, viewed from the RFK bridge (panorama) --Rhododendrites 02:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ossiacher See in Sankt Urban and the Dobratsch in the background, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Possible FP, though I don't know if some people might vote against it because they don't love the light. -- Ikan Kekek 02:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ossiacher See, Tschöran and Bodensdorf, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Train station on Bahnhofstrasse #5 in Bodensdorf, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Café gazebo on the lake in Bodensdorf, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lido Toff in Bodensdorf, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dirt road in the fields, Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail mark, Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church ruins in Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church ruins in Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church ruins in Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 00:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Die "Sagittarius" im Hamburger Hafen --Nightflyer 21:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crypt of Santa Eulalia, Barcelona --C messier 17:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel in Barcelona Cathedral --C messier 17:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palau de la Generalitat de Catalunya --C messier 17:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tusheti National Park, the road to Omalo, view from Abano pass, Georgia. --Moahim 17:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heraldic depiction of the Imperial Crown of Russian Emperors (the golden variant). By User:Spider --Piotr Bart 16:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heraldic imperial crown of Napoleon III. Late heralic crown design of the First French Empire widespread during the Second French Empire. By User:David Liuzzo --Piotr Bart 16:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wyremontowany pałac w Naroku, Górny ŚląskJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --Pudelek 14:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Supportbr />Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Military Cemetery in Siemianowice Śląskie (Laurahütte), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 14:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Independence War Victory Column and St. John's church, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 13:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace of Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 13:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Supportbr />Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Olaf's Church, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 13:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Härdler in the Rothaar Mountains seen from north --Milseburg 13:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Härdler in the Rothaar Mountains seen from west --Milseburg 13:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frosted flasher (Astraptes alardus latia), Costa Rica --Charlesjsharp 08:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greece, Temple of Poseidon at Cape Sounion --Berthold Werner 07:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest meadow at the Hirschbrunnenbach in the Steigerwald near Fatschenbrunn --Ermell 06:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest meadow at the Hirschbrunnenbach in the Steigerwald near Fatschenbrunn --Ermell 06:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stone channel at Roschlaub --Ermell 06:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Schintagrube“ in Kleinweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Schintagrube“ in Kleinweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Schintagrube“ in Kleinweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Schintagrube“ in Kleinweikersdorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 06:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Emergency telephone at EuroVelo 6 in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.--GT1976 05:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cascade de la Roque in commune of Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saponaria ocymoides in commune of Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City limit sign in Onet-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross in Olemps, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cascade de Saunhac in commune of Salles-la-Source , Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reseda lutea (yellow mignonette) in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.--GT1976 05:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This one Dead Rook (Corvus frugilegus ) has had a nasty death, confused between the branches of a Pinus.
--Famberhorst 05:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 05:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination This one Dead Rook (Corvus frugilegus ) has had a nasty death, confused between the branches of a Pinus.
-
- Nomination Bunias orientalis (turkish wartycabbage) in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.--GT1976 05:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 05:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Chiesa di Sant'Afra church in Brescia. --Moroder 05:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Strubben-Kniphorstbos archeologische reservaat Tree crowns against the sky.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 05:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination De Strubben-Kniphorstbos archeologische reservaat Tree crowns against the sky.
-
- Nomination Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam. Bridge 233, Dr. D.M. Sluyspad over the Nieuwe Herengracht.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam. Bridge 233, Dr. D.M. Sluyspad over the Nieuwe Herengracht.
-
- Nomination Motor ship Greate Griene 03800980 of state forest management in Friesland, detail.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Motor ship Greate Griene 03800980 of state forest management in Friesland, detail.
-
- Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) of the falconry center at Riegersburg Castle --Uoaei1 03:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gossypium arboreum, Tallinn Botanic Garden, Estonia --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: District of Strelka and Vinogradovsky Bridge in Krasnoyrsk. View from the observation deck near the monument to Andrey Dubensky.English: Hotel «AMAKS City hotel»English: Main span of the bridge (155 meters)English: East bridge pylonEnglish: West bridge pylonEnglish: Molokov IslandEnglish: Kacha River EstuaryEnglish: Beginning of the Tatyshev IslandEnglish: Tatyshev Anabranch of Yenisei RiverEnglish: Residential complex «Yuzhny Bereg» (South Bank)English: Torgashinsky Range. By User:INeverCry --Мельников 16:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Review Comment - Good quality, but what is the policy on promoting photos by banned users? I suppose they are no longer Commoners, so this nomination must be declined, but I'd like some guidance. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rumex
--Famberhorst 05:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Can you identify a species? --Tournasol7 06:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
*Answer: There are many types of Rumex. Presumably it is Sheep's sorrel (Rumex acetosella). But I am not sure! I have now used the Category: Unidentified Rumex category.--Famberhorst 16:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
:@Tournasol7 and Tournasol7: Category adjusted.--Famberhorst 15:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thanks for yuor review. --Tournasol7 22:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Rumex
-
- Nomination Bhura Singh's shop, tailor from Rampura Jawaharwala, Punjab, India --Gurdeepdali 14:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Most of the scene is unsharp. --C messier 17:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bhura Singh, Tailor from Rampura Jawaharwala, Punjab, India --Gurdeepdali 14:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too noisy/unsharp, needs more categories (the model of the mascinery), looks overprossesed. --C messier 17:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque on church of Ayacucho, Argentina --Ezarate 21:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Please remove CA and make it sides vertical / horizontal --Podzemnik 23:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC) Done Ezarate 01:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but not a single side is either straight or vertical. Somehow soft --Podzemnik 22:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Dülmen,_Börnste,_Mohn_am_Feldrand_--_2019_--_6389.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Poppies in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Lacks sharpness IMO. --Ermell 06:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Short DoF, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Nice use of low DOF. Very slight overexposure, reds are difficult for digital cameras ;-) --Smial 09:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 13:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Dülmen,_Merfeld,_Bauerschaft_--_2019_--_6379.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Barley field near Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 06:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support - Focus is slightly in front of the nearest foreground, short DoF, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Doesn't work as well as the poppies above, but still good quality. --Smial 09:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 13:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Basilica_di_Santa_Maria_delle_Grazie_portale_Brescia.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Portal of the Santa Maria delle Grazie church in Brescia. --Moroder 06:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment:Tut mir leid, aber ivh vermisse die Schärfe! --Manfred Kuzel 07:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Dann musst du es auf "Discuss" setzen. QI imho. --Berthold Werner 08:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 04:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Die vermisste Schärfe könnte ein Problem der Dateigröße sein. Ich kann das Bild zum Beispiel nicht öffnen. Wahrscheinlich kommt der Tag, dass eine handelsübliche PC-Festplatte nicht ausreicht, um ein einziges Foto zu speichern. -- Spurzem 13:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Einer der Gründe, weshalb ich schon vor längerer Zeit auf ein 64-Bit-Betrübsystem und (nach Möglichkeit) 64-Bit-Anwendungen umgestiegen bin. -- Smial 13:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Therefore I'd suggest to implement commons with a medium size file (e.i. 3000x 2000 pixels) to be downloaded --Moroder 14:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Service: 2000px resolution or use the zoomviewer from the file description page (flash or no flash version, hosted at wmflabs). --C.Suthorn 15:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Would be nice for fast viewing in reasonable resolution, but it would make an evaluation according to technical criteria impossible, because the scaling can be realized very differently. It could (over-)sharpen, for speed reasons it could choose a simple interpolation technique instead of, for example, the very time-consuming "lanczos", it could use a JPG compression level different from the original. --Smial 09:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Therefore I'd suggest to implement commons with a medium size file (e.i. 3000x 2000 pixels) to be downloaded --Moroder 14:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Einer der Gründe, weshalb ich schon vor längerer Zeit auf ein 64-Bit-Betrübsystem und (nach Möglichkeit) 64-Bit-Anwendungen umgestiegen bin. -- Smial 13:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support I'm not absolutely convinced with the perspective, and there are some tiny areas with overexposure, but overall the quality is good, even regarding the very high resolution. --Smial 09:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg (talk) 13:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Chiesa_di_San_Faustino_in_Riposo_esterno_est_Brescia.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Facade and roof of the Chiesa di San Faustino in Riposo church in Brescia. --Moroder 08:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Sky is blown --Dktue 12:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I disagree --Moroder 16:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Support Über manche Kritik kann man sich hier nur wundern. -- Spurzem 18:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose The sky is fine but there's a lot of noise under the roofs.not signed --Moroder 12:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Support For me it's ok --Armenak Margarian 18:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC) - Support Good. --Smial 11:53, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst 16:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose At the building on the right side in the upper area CAs --Fischer.H 17:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Question Are you serious or just throwing random judgments like someone else here?--Moroder 20:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Fischer.H is a little bit right, there are some artifacts. I guess they're remnants of Blooming on the building edges against the bright sky. But they are one to two pixels wide and so small and unobtrusive that they really don't bother. If you want to avoid this completely, you will have to render it with blender or povray or similar programs. --Smial 10:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Question My rating was not coincidental, but was due to the existing CAs. Or should quality images with (albeit slight) CAs be found good in the future? --Fischer.H 17:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Yess, they should. No photo is perfect otherwise it would not be a photo. Guidelines suggest that flaws should not be relevant but not absent. There are no photos with perfect perspective, DOF, definition, colours etc. And, quality of a photo is the content, the composition, the encyclopedic utility. We should not get lost with minimal scratches, seen only with magnifying lenses. I'd like to cite here user:poco(A), by far the most important contributor of Commons:"This user does not upload any new material to Commons until 2020 as a protest for the IMHO unacceptable treatment received by other users on this website. If I upload new images after that date those will be previously downsized to avoid pixel peeping " --Moroder 22:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 13:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Domaine_de_Maizerets_park,_quebec_city_06.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Domaine de Maizerets park --Wilfredor 18:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Pretty woman and good quality, plus I think you have the freedom to use this kind of composition (in other words, I wouldn't disqualify this photo because of the crops). However, just like the other nominations, you need to put a little more effort into the filename and description. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Per Ikan; you need to improve the filename and description. --Tournasol7 21:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan & Tournasol7 (plus missing categories). --MB-one 11:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's really unfortunate, but I have to oppose because these simple actions have not been taken. Pity, it's a good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 17:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 13:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)