Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 07 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Münster,_Stadthausturm_--_2017_--_6864.jpg

[edit]

  • Thank you for your help. The bicycle at the left is OK, but the tower in the middle isn't. That's the result of the distortion of the lens. --XRay 13:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree I startet to do different shots and merge. --Moroder 16:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let's check other's opinions --Moroder 16:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Some the distortion was too much with this lens. So I choose the short way and withdraw the nomination. Thanks for your review. --XRay 15:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gosaikunda_and_Bhairab_Kunda_lake_(Panoroma).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panorama of Gosaikunda Lake (4,380 m) and Bhairabkunda Lake (4,250 m). (By Mohan K. Duwal) --Biplab Anand 10:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Clouds on the right are overexposed. Posterization on the lake. Looking to the used camera and the hight of the presented image, quality should be better --Milseburg 09:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I think is good enough for QI --Xicotencatl 12:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for Me -- Bijay chaurasia 13:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 22:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Ganesh_Kunda.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ganesh Kunda in the Langtang region. (By Mohan K. Duwal) --Biplab Anand 09:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Splendid vista and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, but the motif is easy to take and looking to the used camera I can´t see any resaon for scaling down the image more then 50% --Milseburg 09:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit more than 8MP, I don't think we demand that pictures should have the max. resolution the camera can give. --Xicotencatl 12:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, I'll go along with that, considering everything else with the image is good.--Peulle 17:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 22:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Cat_snake.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination কাপ্তাই জাতীয় উদ্যান. By User:Noman Al Moktadir --Masum-al-hasan 06:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Needs proper noise process, identification of species/category missing --A.Savin 08:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Not done ->  Oppose --A.Savin 07:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 11:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Marsh_fritillary_(Euphydryas_aurinia)_male_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) male, Dorset --Charlesjsharp 21:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unsharp and chroma noise, sorry. --Peulle 06:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Sorry @Peulle: , forgot to denoise. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp 11:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, it still doesn't look sharp. The body of the insect seems out of focus.--Peulle 13:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not seeing much unsharpness. The subject is not perfectly flat in this angle. Jkadavoor 03:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Peulle--Lmbuga 21:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Печерський_ландшафтний_парк_-_01_-_цвітіння_тюльпанів_на_Співочому_полі.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Печерський ландшафтний парк, Печерський район --Moahim 16:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • For me that looks explicitly oversaturated. I havent seen such skies below 2000m altitude. --PtrQs 00:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Polarizing filter was used to make this photo - this explains the color of sky. --Moahim 10:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I was wondering, how this picture got a promotion with my tag.
  • @Moahim: It's not your job to promote this picture by yourself! (see versions difference: 10:24, 31 May to previous). As I'm not familiar with this situation, I'll send it to discussion. --PtrQs 00:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Sorry, but I didn't know how to make a comment - I have only two options: "promote" and "decline". --Moahim
  •  Oppose I don't condemn downscaling in general, but downscaling a 21 MPix image to 2.1 MPix is too much. --Tsungam 07:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment It was saved for WEB special for Wiki Loves Earth, and by the rules I have the right to do this. For the QI nomination is the same limit. If it is necessary I can upload larger version. --Moahim
  • @Moahim (I guess this is your comment?) If you have a bigger version of the photo, yes, that should definitely be the one to be nominated for QI rather than this scaled down version. Also, please sign all your comments.--Peulle (talk) 22:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Ok. I will upload larger version. --Moahim 08:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 Support Now an acceptable resolution, IMO. The saturation issue will be for others to judge.--Peulle 13:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Tsungam. I don't see any obvious reason for scaling this down and since it's now just above the 2MP limit, I suspect it has been done purposely.--Peulle 10:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment The same answer as for Tsungam. --Moahim
  •  Oppose - Aside from the downsizing issue, this definitely looks oversaturated to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment It is not oversaturation - it is use of polarization filter. --Moahim
OK, but it _looks_ oversaturated. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Such color of sky (and not only sky) is the reason to use polarization filter, especially at the daytime. I will not desaturate it. --Moahim 11:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't care what technique you use; I only judge the result as I see it. And of course it's your choice what to do or not do. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am sorry. The photo does not look like a photo. It looks like a drawing done with a marker, although it looks like you have very few collors (little variety of colors to paint). Unnatural colors. Clearly oversaturated IMO. It seems overprocessed, sorry.--Lmbuga 21:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Very poor sky (painted) and edges of the building IMO--Lmbuga 21:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)