Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 06 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra) --Uoaei1 03:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) of the falconry center at Riegersburg Castle --Uoaei1 03:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rooms by Apostolos Andreas Monastery, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apostolos Andreas Monastery in Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Unfinished rooms by Apostolos Andreas Monastery, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach on the Southern part of Karpaz, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door, Apostolos Andreas Monastery, Northern Cyprus --Podzemnik 02:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trillium grandiflorum blooming in Backus Woods, Ontario, Canada. --СССР 01:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:58, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northnorthwestern view of the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary, Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain at the park, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stiftsschmiede (collegiate smithy) in Ossiach #4, Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apse of the subsidiary church Saint Anthony, close to Tauern #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stiftsschmiede (collegiate smithy) in Ossiach #4, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giebel mit Erinnerung an die Toten der Sturmflut 1962 --Nightflyer 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Goat (Capra aegagrus hircus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silkie hen, Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of St Anne's, Stanley Rodhullandemu 20:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Top crop is far too tight, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 21:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pinnacle and gargoyle 1, St Anne's, Stanley Rodhullandemu 20:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The gargoyle is slightly out of focus --Uoaei1 04:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casa Tosquella, Barcelona --C messier 15:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nave's ceiling of the Cathedral of Barcelona --C messier 15:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steering wheel and dash board of Ford Mustang from 1966 Spurzem 18:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pavilion of Splendour in the imperial city of Huế, Vietnam. --Supanut Arunoprayote 18:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate within the Imperial palace complex in Hue. --Supanut Arunoprayote 18:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blackened crescent (Anthanassa otanes fulviplaga), Panama --Charlesjsharp 15:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Blühende Clematis (Waldrebe) "Prinz Charles".--Fischer.H 15:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Ok given the size --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Honeywell HTF7350 turbofan engine on a Bombardier Challenger 350 at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 11:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche Panamera Turbo S e-Hybrid at IAA 2017, Frankfurt --MB-one 11:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head of a hen at the zoo Eiblen Park in Ensisheim (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 11:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Question - You're sure that isn't a rooster? -- Ikan Kekek 17:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountains in Annapurna circuit. By User:RyanHanna109 --Biplab Anand 09:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Posterization in the foreground --MB-one 11:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arial view of Bhorley waterfall of Dolakha and Tamakoshi river. By User:NHkirat --Biplab Anand 09:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Startrails above Ghekigo, Bamungo and Nachunkgo mountains at Rolwaling Valley as seen from Na Gaun. By User:NHkirat --Biplab Anand 09:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose This image is of course hard to take, but there are too many issues for QI. --Uoaei1 04:06, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Lawrence church in Bessan, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 06:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Valley of Wilkin River in Otago Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Very beautiful light and shade under the mostly cloudy sky. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ in the Church of the Resurrection in Fürth. New organ in the old case 1989 by Freiburger Orgelbau Hartwig and Tilmann Späth. --Ermell 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the Church of the Resurrection in Fürth --Ermell 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Resurrection in Fürth --Ermell 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial in Fürth --Ermell 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terkaple. Pumping water De Lege Wâlden Terkaple.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Terkaple. Pumping water De Lege Wâlden Terkaple.
-
- Nomination Heerenzijl. Heerenzijl bridge.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Heerenzijl. Heerenzijl bridge.
-
- Nomination Schlumbergera , Lidcactus. Flowering houseplant in the Netherlands. A nice white selection.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Schlumbergera , Lidcactus. Flowering houseplant in the Netherlands. A nice white selection.
-
- Nomination Wolkenformationen. --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but I would intensify the colours (especially the trees) a bit --Llez 05:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Tiefer Graben“ in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Tiefer Graben“ in Oberstinkenbrunn (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. There is barrel distortion - at the building. I've seen the shadow at the gutters. Everything fine. --XRay 05:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schüttkasten in Immendorf (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Fontana della Pallata fountain under the "Torre della Pallata" tower in Brescia. --Moroder 04:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Santa Maria delle Grazie church Brescia. --Moroder 04:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Santa Maria delle Grazie church in Brescia. --Moroder 04:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graduating high school students ("Russ") celebrating the national day of Norway.--Peulle 13:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
There's a spot on the left side of the crowd (maybe dust on the lens) --MB-one 19:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
In addition, the picture seems to be sharpened too much. -- Spurzem 20:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Per above. --Palauenc05 06:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Graduating high school students ("Russ") celebrating the national day of Norway.--Peulle 13:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Police van in Drammen during the 17th of May celebration 2019.--Peulle 13:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline For my taste the car is too distorted. Another problem is the sun making harsh shadow. -- Spurzem 15:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Agree. Barrel distortion is very prominent. The contrast is too high due to harsh sunlight. --Stoxastikos 09:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas' Church, view of Tallinn from St. Olaf's church, Estonia --Poco a poco 04:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Note: I think the camera has moved.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
And I think that you're right, I take it back Poco a poco 22:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Police car in Drammen during the 17th of May celebration 2019.-Peulle 17:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I can't see why this random snapshot should be a QI. Lacking sharpness, noisy and a very unfortunate composition. One third of the image consists of a zebra crossing while the building on the right is cut off. --Palauenc05 08:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Police car in Drammen during the 17th of May celebration 2019.-Peulle 17:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Top of main altar in the Santa Maria della Carità church in Brescia. --Moroder 11:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
The dust spot should be removed. --Ermell 06:45, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Done Thanks--Moroder 18:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Still there. See annotation. The same spot is on some of your other images. --Ermell 22:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 12:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A gray koi in a pond at Hakone Gardens in Saratoga, California. --Grendelkhan 16:22, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 18:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 19:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC) Question Excellent sharpness and motif. But I want to ask again for a higher resolution. The camera offers much more. --Milseburg 12:34, 27 May 2019 (UTC) @Tournasol7: Question --Milseburg 12:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This image is cropped. --Tournasol7 21:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Comment For the full view it would be interesting to upload the original resolution separately as an other version. --Milseburg 06:40, 1 June 2019 (UTC) @Tournasol7: Is this possible? --Milseburg 22:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas' Church, viewed from Toompea, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 09:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunate camera shake. --C messier 15:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Will update a new version tomorrow Poco a poco 22:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Town Hall Square, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 13:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Southern view of the parish and pilgrimage church Saints Primus and Felician, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 00:55, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Towerrabe.png
[edit]- Nomination Raven of the Tower of London. --Cyberolm 12:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Noise reduction needed --MB-one 13:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Added some noise reduction. --Cyberolm 13:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Chenspec 14:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Head is not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 23:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for ma.--Manfred Kuzel 06:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed: blurring noise reduction. --Smial 11:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 13:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Ķemeru_purva_skaistums.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Spider web in Ķemeri National park By User:Jolanta Liva
- Decline
- Support Good quality, schöne Tiefenschärfe. --Manfred Kuzel 09:19, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Sorry. IMO there are CAs and DoF should be better. --XRay 09:41, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to raise a couple of questions here, if I may. First of all, it doesnt't look like a shallow depth of field issue to me. The cobweb is not so thick after all, and it would be even better, actually, if the DOF was shallower, because the background details are not very important here composition-wise. I believe the problem lies in the unnecessary cranked up ISO. I heard that 6D handles noise well, but there are, apparently, some physical limits. The noise erodes detailes, making the image blurry and enhancing CA. Was it really important to use such a short SS (1/4000) I don't know of course, but I guess that making it 1/2000 and lowering the ISO down to 800 or, say, to 400, would do the image a world of good. Second point is, shouldn't the images uploaded to encyclopedia have at least some illustrative qualities to them? I mean, aren't they supposed to illustrate the articles? What article this particular image is supposed to illustrate? --Stoxastikos 15:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- It's Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. The image must not illustrate an article. (May be it can be nominated at VIC.) The aperture should be closed for example to f/6.3. The image becomes sharper and the DoF would be better, the background would be still unsharp enough. ISO 1.600 is too much for this kind of image, it should be for example ISO 100. --XRay 07:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- If there was even a light wind, which we do not know, a very short shutter time might have been necessary. A spider's web likes to tremble very much. I have spoiled such pictures several times... --Smial 11:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Very athmospheric image, but wrong focus and somewhat overexposed. -- Smial 11:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:2014_in_Sihanoukville._Ekareach_street.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sihanoukville. Ekareach street. --Dmitry Makeev 08:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I think it's overprocessed. Some part like the street lamp looks like too much of HDR effect was used --Podzemnik 23:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment no HDR in the camera. --Dmitry Makeev 18:43, 30 May 2019 (UTC) - Oppose per Podzemnik: contrast is overall too high and the sharpness is not that good to balance that. --MB-one 13:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpening even visible at A4 resp. letter size. Probably also somewhat oversaturated. --Smial 11:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:PlacaEscuela1Ayacucho.1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Plaque in School #1 of Ayacucho, Argentina --Ezarate 21:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 17:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I'd like to see more opinions on this. It's very easy to take a picture like that - steady and flat so it's easy to focus. Yet it's sort of grey, not very sharp and we're getting only 20 % of camera's potential megapixels --Podzemnik 23:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Podzemnik. --Peulle 17:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Rather soft, some remains of CA, barrel distortion, rather low resolution. --Smial 11:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Classic_Days_2019,_Berlin_(CDB90011).jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Continental Mark IV at Classic Days Berlin 2019, Kurfürstendamm, Berlin-Charlottenburg --MB-one 07:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Review
So shiny and chrome! But wouldn't it be even better, if you try to use a polarizer on it? The reflections on the bonnet look interesting, but on the glass they seem to a bit too distracting in my opinion. --Stoxastikos 09:44, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Support - I'm not sure why this was headed toward CR without even a single vote on it, but I like the reflections on the glass, too. -- Ikan Kekek 04:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Very unfortunate lighting. I would not present such a photo as QI. -- Spurzem 10:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Spurzem --Cvmontuy 17:44, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Piotr Bart 14:56, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 11:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose the reflections and the busy background are distracting, so the car itself doesn't catch the attention. --Dirtsc 20:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 13:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)