Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 05 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ναός_Ζωοδόχου_Πηγής,_Αλικιανός_1653.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The church of Zoodochos Pigi, Alikianos, Crete. --C messier 20:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Irrelevant photo name. --Remontees 22:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Sufficient quality. Remontees, why are you crusading against Greek? -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
    Yeah, pretty embarassing. --A.Savin 19:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aristeas 10:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support--Peulle 15:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 19:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 19:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Appenzell_Landsgemeindeplatz_20210528.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Houses in Appenzell, Switzerland --Domob 07:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Poor light and not so good composition. --Remontees 22:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I'd describe the photo as "ornamental houses with crane", but the composition is acceptable in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 13:39, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Markt_2_in_Wittstock_Dosse.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Building at Markt 2 in Wittstock/Dosse, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Bad composition and chromatic anomalies. --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Minor  Support I would crop out half of the street, but acceptable. --XRay 08:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 11:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:25_Rue_du_Bourguet_in_Najac_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Building at 25 Rue du Bourguet in Najac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad composition and exposure. --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good exposure, composition OK. --Aristeas 10:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 11:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_ehemalige_St.-Barbara-Kaserne,_Krankenstation_--_2021_--_0400.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Infirmary of the former St. Barbara barracks in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor composition. --Remontees 22:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Please explain why it's a poor composition in your eyes. It's kind of minimalism, but poor? --XRay 08:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition. --Aristeas 10:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 17:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Pont_de_Savines_depuis_les_hauteurs_et_petit_port_de_plaisance_(mai_2021)_-_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pont de Savines depuis les hauteurs et petit port de plaisance (mai 2021). Photographie prise depuis un sentier du flanc du Pierre Arnoux : à gauche l'aiguille de Chabrières ; à droite le Mont Guillaume. --Benoît Prieur 07:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose I think that your photo is a little bit tilted, isn't it? --Remontees 22:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good composition at review size, I don't notice any tilt. At 100% zoom, significant lack of sharpness is evident over much of the image. --Tagooty 16:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined XRay 17:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Temple_of_Portunus_in_Rome_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Temple of Portunus in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor exposure+tilted. --Remontees 22:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. Maybe one could oppose because it’s a tiny little bit soft, but I can neither find a “poor” exposure (what’s a poor exposure?) nor a tilt. --Aristeas 10:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 11:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Hostinne_Kostel_Nejsv_Trojice_kriz_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 1809 stone cross at the Holy Trinity Church in Hostinné --JiriMatejicek 16:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • The image is very soft. There are minor CAs too and the resolution could be better for this kind of image. The red linked category should be fixed. --XRay 04:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the comments. The category was added by a robot (as part of Wikimedia project), now corrected. The other issues seem minor to me, but can be improved only by taking a new picture with another camera, I guess. --JiriMatejicek 14:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  • It is not neccessary to take a new photo. You can improve the image by a photo editor. --XRay 17:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support The CAs are "very minor", almost invisible (at least on my screen), for me a QI --Palauenc05 11:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, IMO the image is not good enough for QI. It looks like JPEG artifacts, the resolution is low for this kind of image and there are minor CAs, --XRay 08:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment The subject is good but the magenta CA on the branches on the right bugs me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support don't see anything too egregious, and the primary subject is sharp enough. ok for me Rhododendrites 13:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose for CA. -- Ikan Kekek 19:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per XRay. --Nefronus 09:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Rhododendrites and Palauenc05. It's clear that the camera sensor was a little overwhelmed with the high contrast, but at least there are no distracting colour distortions as a result. The slight vignetting supports the image more than it disturbs it. --Smial 00:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Rhododendrites and Palauenc05. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial--Lmbuga 13:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay, sorry. Tournasol7 06:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay.--Peulle 09:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Ikan Kekek and XRay --Tagooty 03:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support --Commonists 18:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay--Remontees 22:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment The object tilts a bit to the left. --F. Riedelio 15:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)