Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 04 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Brilon_Bahnhof_1.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Ich, der Urheber dieses Werkes, veröffentliche es unter der folgenden Lizenz: --Siegfried von Brilon 22:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment All verticals are tilted CCW. Funny description too ;-) though it’s not necessary to give an English description it’s always a good idea so your image can be found easier when researching. --Kreuzschnabel 05:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
     Info I uploaded a new versions that fixed this problem. --Hic et nunc 14:05, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
     Weak oppose In full resolution it looks noisy, oversharpened and too harsh in contrast to me. Let’s have another opinion. --Kreuzschnabel 06:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined Biopics 06:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Mustluiged_Luigetiigis1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Black Swans (Cygnus atratus) in Kadrioru park --Iifar 17:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support QI for me. --Kadellar 22:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose I don't like the composiiton - the head of the front bird gets a bit lost in the body of the back bird --BenAveling 06:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose As BenAveling. --Dirtsc 12:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined Biopics 06:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Can-Am Spyder RSS (01).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Can-Am Spyder RSS. --Steindy 20:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Review Below 2MB. Other version possible? --Dirtsc 18:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
    Sorry, I dont understand what you mean with the 2MB? Please take a look at teh size of the photo. --Steindy 16:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    "Dateigrösse 1,12 MB" lt. Eigenschaften auf Commons. Sollte aber min 2MB für QI sein. --Dirtsc 18:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    Are there any new booking conditions? I think you are confusing since MP (megapixel) with MB (megabytes)!? --Steindy 21:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    You are right! My fault, sorry! --Dirtsc 06:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
    Nice that we have now discussed at length about the conditions, but nothing about the images. --Steindy 16:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
     Neutral Compared to the promoted image of the Spyder RSS this here lacks a little bit of sharpness in the areas of the headlights. --Dirtsc 04:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days Biopics 06:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Can-Am Spyder ST (01).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Can-Am Spyder ST. --Steindy 20:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Review Below 2MB. Other version possible? --Dirtsc 18:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
    Sorry, I dont understand what you mean with the 2MB? Please take a look at teh size of the photo. --Steindy 16:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    "Dateigrösse 1,12 MB" lt. Eigenschaften auf Commons. Sollte aber min 2MB für QI sein. --Dirtsc 18:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    Are there any new booking conditions? I think you are confusing since MP (megapixel) with MB (megabytes)!? --Steindy 21:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
    You are right! My fault, sorry! --Dirtsc 06:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
    Nice that we have now discussed at length about the conditions, but nothing about the images. --Steindy 16:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
     Neutral Overall a little bit too dark. --Dirtsc 04:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days Biopics 06:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kauzenburg bei Nacht.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Kauzenburg by night --Pudelek 20:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline too dark, sorry -- Arcalino 06:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ FixedI uploaded a new version with the original filesize that is not so dark anymore. --Hic et nunc 12:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined Biopics 06:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Eiffel_tower_from_Cite_Architecture_Chaillot.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Eiffel Tower seen from the Palais de Chaillot, Paris, France --Myrabella 20:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Nice light and composition. QI for me. --Kadellar 21:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the Tower is not really sharp --Arcalino 06:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Sharpened. --Myrabella 11:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me now. --Cayambe 12:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Cayambe. --JLPC 13:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me too. --Moonik 11:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Well done. --Hic et nunc 14:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now -- Arcalino 07:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Biopics 06:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Église Saint-Mathias Fingig 05.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of Fingig, Luxembourg --VT98Fan 15:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Needs perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done --VT98Fan 06:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me now Poco a poco 15:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support though there's a bit too much of the street here to my taste. --Cayambe 16:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Biopics 06:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Sa_Die_de_Sa_Sardigna_-_San_Salvatore_-_April_28th_2013_-_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sardinian Carnival in San Salvatore. --NorbertNagel 10:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Nice and useful but tilted --Moroder 15:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Not done Mattbuck 20:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed I uploaded a new version. Now it don't tilt anymore. --Hic et nunc 13:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
    Thanks! I wasn't aware of this request. --NorbertNagel 15:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 17:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cayambe 16:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Biopics 06:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Wincrange_Leeresmuhle.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Landscape with farm in Luxembourg. --Cayambe 15:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Christian Ferrer 16:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too blurry for QI --Nino Verde 18:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --VT98Fan 08:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Carschten 22:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --JLPC 13:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Biopics 06:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Bois des Aresquiers, Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Camargue horse (Equus caballus) between the Bois des Aresquiers and the Étang d'Ingril. Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 18:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Opposethe horse's head is hidden because its feeding, for QI as the subject it needed to be visable. Gnangarra 09:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
    I changed the name and the description, now the horse is not the main subject witch is the Bois des Aresquiers, Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 11:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
    sorry a headless horse is still a distraction Gnangarra 15:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
    Yes it's a distraction and I think it's nice. It's a part of the composition and maybe you don't like it. An animal feeding in a landscape is also a distraction but it's reality. It's a picture of the reality. For me it's not a good reason to decline. --Christian Ferrer 18:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
     Comment I repeat the horse is not the main subject, if it's hungry, it can feed facing to south, north, west or east. Please don't decline because you don't like to see horse's bottoms --Christian Ferrer 21:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Horse is ok, no any problem. But: CA over trees especially at the right, bad lighting over all image killing details and no clear subject of photo. BTW, why you post your images twice? --Nino Verde 10:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Indeed, I agree, there is certainly a lot of reason to decline this file but not for the horse, it make it a good composition. I think I don't post any file twice but indeed there is a problem, a lot of files are duplicates in the base of the page. --Christian Ferrer 11:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
    • I declined when the horse was the image subject, IMHO a headless horse at a primary focal point still makes for a poor composition. If you agree that there are a lot reasnos to decline this image then why post it to QI in the first place Gnangarra 04:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
    • I said 'there is CERTAINLY a lot of reason to decline', and when I post it to QI, I was not very sure of that because I'm not a very competent photographer, so I'm really sorry to have disturb you --Christian Ferrer 05:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cayambe 05:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)