Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 30 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hymenocallis_littoralis_@_KL_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hymenocallis littoralis (Beach spider-lily) --GerifalteDelSabana 02:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I must disagree: for a flower shot, I think the DoF is too short, leaving too much of the actual flower unsharp.--Peulle 09:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle, sorry --Sandro Halank 13:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle, --Fischer.H 17:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kaisermantel_(Argynnis_paphia)_6170397.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Silver-washed fritillary (Argynnis paphia) on gravel --Ermell 07:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too unsharp specially on one antenna, Very sorry !. --Olivier LPB 14:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
    The eyes are sharp and that´s important. --Ermell 19:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ermell. This is an interesting angle, and from this angle, it's very difficult to get more sharpness over a larger area of the body. I think the level of clarity on the face and one antenna is sufficient for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Strong support per ikan. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:05, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per Ikan --Sandro Halank 13:37, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 20:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Düsseldorf,_der_Rheinturm_vanaf_die_Rheinkniebrücke_IMG_3025_2018-05-06_08.27.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Düsseldorf-NRW, tower (der Rheinturm) from the bridge (die Rheinkniebrücke) --Michielverbeek 06:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Not perfect, but okay for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:57, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. the tower must be more vertical --Jmh2o 17:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The tower is vertical at the bottom, but not at the top. Might be some barrel distortion. --Smial 15:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Measured it with rulers in Gimp. The middle axis of the tower is perfectly upright. The upper part appears not to be upright visually, because it is distorted. Due to distortion also the houses at the right end lean outward to the right. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Towards the right end, where lens sharpness drops, processing has sharpened the houses, but has mistaken the remaining detail on trees as noise, so that any structures on the trees are washed out by noise reduction. Detail has also been lost on the bridge. The seeming sharpness comes only from edge-sharpening. Also too-strong noise reduction on the water produced an unnatural "frozen" impression, especially towards the lower left corner. --JRff (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree with Johannes about the trees, but IMO the image is too posterized. The tower is OK imo. --GerifalteDelSabana 04:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I could be missing something, but it looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per GerifalteDelSabana --Sandro Halank 13:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per GerifalteDelSabana, --Fischer.H 17:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Trier_Sankt_Paulus_BW_2017-11-05_16-32-48.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Trier, Kirche Sankt Paulus, Altarraum --Berthold Werner 18:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose the photo is not sharp enough --Jmh2o 19:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree I can not see severe sharpness problems. --Smial 18:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good image. I can only wonder about some criticisms. What should not be sharp enough? -- Spurzem 10:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support It's a weak support. IMO sharpness is OK. Some minor motion blur in the background and lights a little bit overexposed. --XRay 18:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per XRay --Sandro Halank 18:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 07:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Solidly good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 20:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

File:ਲੋਹੜੀ_Lohri.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination ਲੋਹੜੀ ਉੱਤਰੀ ਭਾਰਤ ਦਾ, ਖ਼ਾਸ ਕਰ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਅਤੇ ਹਰਿਆਣੇ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਮਸ਼ਹੂਰ ਤਿਉਹਾਰ. By User:Sukhan saar --Satdeep Gill 05:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline Would like to have some information about this picture in English.--GPSLeo 16:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
    ✓ Done English description added --Satdeep Gill 15:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 09:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree; there is very little sharpness (even taking the heat blur into account), and I find that light streak in front of the guy on the right disturbing.--Peulle 12:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Interesting photo but bad quality -- Basile Morin 01:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basile Morin --Sandro Halank 18:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No QI for me, --Fischer.H 17:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
  • I get no pleasure in this, but I, too,  Oppose per Basile's point. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)