Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 29 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:OndinadePlatareflejadaenelagua-jul2016.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Estatua Ondina de Plata y su reflejo en el agua, Jardín Botánico de Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 01:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Shouldn't QIs be correctly categorized? --Berthold Werner 11:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC) --Berthold Werner 09:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Ezarate 12:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok now. W.carter 11:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Συκαμιά Σερίφου 1923.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sykamia, Serifos. --C messier 14:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO too unsharp. May be too low contrast too. I think it's difficult to take another one. --XRay 06:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)--XRay 15:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Added some contrast, but I don't see unsharpness. --C messier 10:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Thanks. IMO the water can crop out at the top too. But it's acceptable. --XRay 15:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support sharp enough in 100% view -- Smial 09:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Cologne_Germany_Cologne-Gay-Pride-2016_Parade-032.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cologne, Germany: Headgear of a participant of Cologne Pride Parade 2016 --Cccefalon 03:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The head gear is sharp enough but it is so dominating that it should be centered in the pic, perhaps a crop? The white downy fluff needs a bit more structure and the rater white/light sky and flags behind it could use a little boost. There is some slight CA on the small building top right. Do you think you could fix this? --W.carter 21:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bad crop --Atamari 18:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Looks pretty much as a huffy reaction on the QIC Abuse thread. However, it is also bad behaviour to override a review comment with an oppose without giving the opportunity to look into the alleged issue. --Cccefalon 20:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Nein, keine Rache-Aktion (das mag ich nicht), ich schaute aber bei dem "First class premium-Revier" wie seine Bilder aussehen. Dieses ist für deine Verhältnisse nur ein mittelmäßiges Bild - das kannst du besser. Das Bild ist zwar scharf im Bereich der linken Schulter aber der Ausschnitt überzeugt (mir) nicht. Links ist das Objekt, der Kopfschmuck, das wohl der Fokus des Bildes darstellen soll, zu sehr am Rand gedrängt. Vielleicht es ging wohl nicht besser. Und oben setzt sich auch der Kopfschmuck auch nicht schön von der Flagge ab. Nach unten ist der Kopfschmuck auch unglücklich beschnitten, auch ragt dort unten rechts ein halber Kopf hinein. Wenn du doch schönere Bilder machen kannst - warum dieses Bild? Was hat bei deiner Wahl hier gestört? Ging es dir hier um +1 auf des QI-Konto? ;-) --Atamari (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
      • Dear, it is not that I am short of images for nomination, I have around 50.000 unprocessed here and if you observe my upload list, you easily see that I am far from putting every photo to my nomination list. It is a petty demand, to ask the same quality for street photography than for studiophotography or architecture/landscape photography. What the fuck - after having nominated some superior photos, you think I cannot achieve promotion for a photo of normal quality? This photo is good as it is. It is taken with the best camera settings you can obtain for a close-up for moving objects in a crowd. --Cccefalon 08:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The right part of the head gear is out of focus, and the white parts of it blends with the background. --Peulle 15:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I can´t see, how to make it better. A smaller crop maybe? The back of the head and the main part of the head figure - which is in fact the main subject, is perfectly sharp. --Hubertl 04:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Cropped a bit tight but QI for me.--Ermell 20:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support like Hubertl --Verum 10:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK4QI --A.Savin 16:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)