Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 28 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bharatanatyam_Mudra_(21).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bharatanatyam Facial expressions MudraI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 14:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lack of sharpness. Sorry. --Alexander-93 15:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp, artifacts and lack of detail due high ISO, hair merging with background. --Plozessor 05:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is unsharp and lacks detail. --Augustgeyler 07:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. If I assume that these are all stage photos that were taken in the available light, then I think the criticism of image noise and lack of contrast between black hair against a black background is exaggerated. I see excellent image compositions, good exposure according to the circumstances and quite natural-looking colors. Unfortunately, the rather mediocre image sharpness cannot be overlooked. I also tried my stage photos with kit lenses in the beginning, the experience was rather sobering and the solution rather expensive. Overall, I consider the image quality to be good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 13:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Bharatanatyam_Mudra_(15).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bharatanatyam Facial expressions MudraI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 14:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Low detail/noisy --Poco a poco 18:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp, artifacts and lack of detail due high ISO, hair merging with background. --Plozessor 05:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Augustgeyler 07:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. If I assume that these are all stage photos that were taken in the available light, then I think the criticism of image noise and lack of contrast between black hair against a black background is exaggerated. I see excellent image compositions, good exposure according to the circumstances and quite natural-looking colors. Unfortunately, the rather mediocre image sharpness cannot be overlooked. I also tried my stage photos with kit lenses in the beginning, the experience was rather sobering and the solution rather expensive. Overall, I consider the image quality to be good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 13:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Yellow-fronted_canary_(Crithagra_mozambica_granti)_male_Kruger.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yellow-fronted canary (Crithagra mozambica granti) male --Charlesjsharp 07:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Красный 14:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice image, but isn't it too small to be QI? --Екатерина Борисова 01:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is 2.5 MP so in theory fine, but for the low resolution it's not sharp enough. --Plozessor 05:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Class_182,_Berlin_(20190328_095118).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination DBAG Class 182 in Berlin-Charlottenburg --MB-one 21:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is  Overprocessed and lost all textures and detail. --Augustgeyler 22:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Augustgeyler. --Smial 13:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Bharatnatyam_different_facial_expressions_(3).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bharatnatyam different facial expressions --Suyash.dwivedi 09:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It clearly lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 18:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry and noisy. --Plozessor 06:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Augustgeyler 06:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again I see excellent image compositions, good exposure according to the circumstances and quite natural-looking colors. Unfortunately, this one is too soft even in A4-size. --Smial 14:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Bharatnatym_Mudra_(45).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bharatanatyam Facial expressions Mudra --Suyash.dwivedi 09:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp, not a QI to me, sorry, let's discuss --Poco a poco 18:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very blurry and noisy. --Plozessor 06:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again I see excellent image compositions, good exposure according to the circumstances and quite natural-looking colors. Unfortunately, this one is too soft even in A4-size, and has motion blur. --Smial 14:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:BarElPreferido-CABA-jul2024-1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Notable bar El Preferido, Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 23:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Under exposure and perspective distortion. --2015 Michael 2015 11:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • reprocessed, thanks!! --Ezarate 16:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose error due to tool --Ezarate 16:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • The exposure is now "OK" but the buildings on the right are still "falling" to the right. --2015 Michael 2015 16:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • check now please, thanks!! --Ezarate 16:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It got worse. Over-corrected perspective now. Moved to CR. --Augustgeyler 08:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Massive distortion (leaning out on both sides). --Plozessor 06:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The lighting conditions during the photo shoot were very unfavourable. The buildings and the street in the foreground are too dark, the high-rise building in the back left is relatively bright. This building also appears to be tilting to the left and the high-rise building in front to the right. -- Spurzem 08:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Brest_Railway_Museum_СО_17-3268_Steam_Locomotive_2023-03-05_3145.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination СО 17-3268 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 09:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think it is slightly overexposed and therefore the sky color is undersaturated. --2015 Michael 2015 12:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @2015 Michael 2015: if you disagree with a vote, please set it to "Discuss", rather than "Nomination". --MB-one 09:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Picture is good. Warning sign Warning Vote was not signed --Augustgeyler 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Oops, that was me, now signing my vote :) --Plozessor 10:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Świdnica,_ulica_Franciszkańska,_8_lipca_2024_,_KsP.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Świdnica, kamienicaJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencji --KrzysztofPoplawski 18:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Nice composition, but nothing is really sharp.Sorry --Alexander-93 11:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done i tried to fix it. pleas check it again. --KrzysztofPoplawski 20:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, now, too many details are lost.--Alexander-93 18:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Info Moved to CR --Augustgeyler 14:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed (sharpening the originally blurry image did not work well). --Plozessor 06:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 07:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 16:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)