Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 25 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Castle Traun with new moat --Isiwal 04:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The lake "Almsee" in Grünau, Upper Austria --Isiwal 04:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Erfurter Straße 38 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruisseau de Bassies in PNR Pyrénées ariégeoises, Ariege, France. --Tournasol7 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Amans du Fort church in Aubin, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larus dominicanus and Haematopus species at Firth of Thames in Waikato Region, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Pruines, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lion gate #5 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Latin inscription at the overdoor of the lion gate #5 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the Khevenhüller gate #07 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall gate #11 at castle Hochosterwitz, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW i3 in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW i3 in the Stever valley, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW i3 in the Stever valley, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kellergasse „Silberberg“ in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail der Mariensäule in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:18, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mariensäule in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pfarrkirche in Altlichtenwarth (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 02:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination All Souls' Church, Christchurch, New Zealand --Podzemnik 02:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 02:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination All Souls' Church, Christchurch, New Zealand --Podzemnik 02:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rubbish bins in Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 02:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red postal boxes, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aschaffenburg-Schweinheim, protected landscape element 9 "Bischberg Westhang" (LB-01226), part of nature park "Bayerischer Spessart" --KaiBorgeest 21:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 02:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road in Bunge, Gotland. --ArildV 21:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kales fortress, Ierapetra. --C messier 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kales fortress central court, Ierapetra. --C messier 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kales fortress entrance, Ierapetra. --C messier 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drapetsona fertilizer factory, Athens. --C messier 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument Brunswick, Geneva. --C messier 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination So called Kirschblütenschule in Mülheim-Kärlich Spurzem 18:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination VW Cross Polo Series IV (2005–2009). Spurzem 17:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellowstone NP, Mud Volcano Area, Sizzling Basin --Dirtsc 15:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellowstone NP, Mud Volcano Area, Sizzling Basin --Dirtsc 15:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination CEC Palace, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 10:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination CEC Palace, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 10:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cocos Monastery, Romania --Poco a poco 10:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Great photo. I'm not sure whether there's room for another FP of this monastery, but this is FP quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 14:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Happy to hear that, yes, the place is a FP hot spot :) Poco a poco 18:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trenčín Castle --Imehling 10:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Quality on the left not as good as anywhere else, but overall ok --Poco a poco 17:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Purple-throated mountaingem (Lampornis calolaema) male, Panama --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Purple-throated mountaingem (Lampornis calolaema) male, Panama --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brown violetear (Colibri delphinae), Panama --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser violetear (Colibri cyanotus), Panama --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lesser violetear (Colibri cyanotus), Panama --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road in Bunge, Gotland. --ArildV 08:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings on the street Ryske gränd in Visby, Sweden. --ArildV 07:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:18, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Notre-Dame du Gua in Aubin, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Not really sharp, despite the relatively low resolution of only 7 MPixels from a camera with 24Mpixels. --Smial 11:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4-6 Place Nationale in Montauban, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination On the northern slope of Mount Ruapehu in Tongariro NP, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bave River in Saint-Céré, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 06:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination River Laggu in northern Norway --Ermell 06:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination River Laggu in northern Norway --Ermell 06:54, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wood scabious (Knautia dipsacifolia) --Uoaei1 05:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caserne des pompiers de Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost (juillet 2019). --Benoît Prieur 05:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. Broekbosje in the water.
--Famberhorst 05:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. Broekbosje in the water.
-
- Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. Persicaria amphibia
--Famberhorst 05:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Nature area De Kraanlânnen of It Fryske Gea. Persicaria amphibia
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea. Stump of a sawn-off branch of a Pinaceae.
--Famberhorst 05:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:27, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea. Stump of a sawn-off branch of a Pinaceae.
-
- Nomination View towards Norsholmen. --ArildV 20:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kales fortress interior, Crete --C messier 06:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kales fortress, Ierapetra. --C messier 06:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green kingfisher (Chloroceryle americana septentrionalis) male, Panama --Charlesjsharp 13:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Difficult, but I think the quality is good enough, considering the size of the bird.. --Dirtsc 16:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape of commune of Broquies, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
One stitching error at the left side and some spots should be fixed. --Ermell 07:50, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Done. ~~~~ --Tournasol7 09:26, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Halych Castle of the XIV–XVII century (architectural monument of national significance). Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, Halych. By User:SvartKat --Ahonc 21:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hovhannes Tumanyan (Armenian poet) statue in Yerevan, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 20:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antwerpen-port, industrial building in the Litouwenstraat --Michielverbeek 10:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of a higher place near Alt-Graun in Italy. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Text about the section of the former Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Verticals should be vertical and the categorization should be better. --XRay 03:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A memorial from the former prime minister Horst Seehofer. --PantheraLeo1359531 21:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review
The image is leaning out at the left. Please check the perspective and please improve the categorization. --XRay 04:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Yellowstone NP, West Thumb Geyser Basin --Dirtsc 12:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Yellowstone NP, West Thumb Geyser Basin --Dirtsc 12:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Sambar Deer in S.V. Zoological park --IM3847 02:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Construction site in Tomineborgveien, Drammen.--Peulle 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)The last five elements of the barrier are too bright and therefore difficult to recognize. -- Spurzem 13:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment I'm not sure what you mean; are you saying the highlights are too bright?--Peulle 07:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Construction site in Tomineborgveien, Drammen.--Peulle 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)The last five elements of the barrier are too bright and therefore difficult to recognize. -- Spurzem 13:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Construction site in Tomineborgveien, Drammen.--Peulle 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review The image description is four times the same. Is it not possible to specify more what should be shown? -- Spurzem 13:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Question What would you have me say? I'm not an engineer, so I don't know the details. It's a construction site where they have dug up the entire road, changed the plumbing, re-filled the hole and now they're re-making the road again.--Peulle 06:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of the KdF building from the beach. --PantheraLeo1359531 09:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Comment To me, it seems like the picture is leaning and needs a little CCW rotation. Can you check if the edge of the building is horizontal? --Domob 15:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Ciofes_dinsta_te_Ncisles_Gherdëina.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Trail on the Ncisles pasture in Gherdëina, South Tyrol. --Moroder 07:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Needs a more specific category, green lens flare at middle top, inflated file size --Poco a poco 19:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Done Thanks, it's not an "inflated file size", it's the normal size of a medium format camera, downsizing seems to be forbidden --Moroder 08:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- The flare is gone, but sorry, you do inflate. I shot with FF for many years and my camera has more MPx than yours, and I rarely upload a file with more than 10 MB. The file size has nothing to do with downSAMPLING. I'm asking to reduce the upsizing of your files, as it isn't normal. --Poco a poco 19:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment FF, I guess full frame, is not the same as medium format and what you say does not make sense --Moroder 04:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- If you want to finish the discussion with a "what you say makes no sense", fine. Just do me a favour and read about downsizing and downsampling, and also export this file with a size of 10 MB and tell me if you see a different vs 30 MB. --Poco a poco 08:53, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment I know exactly the difference. I don't have any reason to downsample the output file and modify the file size set by Hasselblad --Moroder 13:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- No reason? reducing space on the project servers, letting quicker downloads, and both without loss of quality. Again, I talk about downsizing, not downsampling, same resolution, smaller file size --Poco a poco 15:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment A request for downsizing is a personal view and no issue for QIC --Moroder 08:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Sent to CR for discussion there.--Peulle 08:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment The big file size results from a motif, that has a lot of high contrast details all over the whole image. I tried saving the image with irfanview at 100% quality with subsampling "off" and got even 45MB file size. Subsamplng set to "on" still has 30 MB. So I believe, there ist nothing "inflated". High detail images give big filesizes, it's that simple. In addition, the file contains unusually many different color values, irfanview counts far more than 600,000 different colors. This may be related to the ability of the MF sensor to differentiate many colors in the shadow areas, where small sensors in telephones and compact cameras, high-resolution crop cameras and also the Canon with 50 MPixels like to make a mess. Of course it is possible to set higher compression rates, irfanview set to 80% gives about 9MB, but then you get lots of compression artifacts. No way. --Smial 09:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Sureley, a shot of a blue sky everywhere versus a shot of a subject with very different colors and samples will guide to a small or big size. That is obvious and not the point here. Long story short: prove that an image like this one with 33 MB is of higher quality if you export it with full quality but limiting the size to 15 MB. If you succeed, I'll shut up. If it cannot be proven then it is an inflated file. Period. Poco a poco 16:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Info I uploaded a version here saved at 100 and 80 % jpg-quality. You can see the difference if you look carefully, not huge differences but still possible to see. The smaller file is still 22 mb and D810 have only 36 mp. Nikon and Hasselblad have superior sensors compared with Canon, with better color depth and significantly greater dynamic range and therefore larger files?--ArildV 17:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment I simply don't understand the term "inflating" in this context. In all instructions for photos with good quality it is pointed out that you should save with lowest JPG compression to prevent artefacts. Detailed pictures in full resolution then have such large files. From my K-1, always with exactly the same compression settings, images come out between under 20MB to (rarely) over 40 MB. I don't "inflate" anything and can only influence this by either downscaling the images or setting higher compression rates, contrary to all the usual recommendations here. --Smial 19:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
- Sureley, a shot of a blue sky everywhere versus a shot of a subject with very different colors and samples will guide to a small or big size. That is obvious and not the point here. Long story short: prove that an image like this one with 33 MB is of higher quality if you export it with full quality but limiting the size to 15 MB. If you succeed, I'll shut up. If it cannot be proven then it is an inflated file. Period. Poco a poco 16:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Smial 09:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Support - Good quality, and I don't understand the dispute about the size. -- Ikan Kekek 15:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Seven Pandas 00:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Sweets_of_Tunisia_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A selection of sweets offered for a small Eid al-fitr celebration in Tunisia --Kritzolina 08:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 19:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose IMO too dark, a little bit noise and blurry. --XRay 05:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose per others. Seven Pandas must not have checked this thoroughly.--Peulle 07:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Peulle: Snide back-handed comments are not needed. Seven Pandas 23:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Low DOF and probably blurred by noise reduction. --Smial 18:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 00:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Sonneneinstrahlung_in_Wald_6146421054.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View into the outside of the forest with tree shadows. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
CommentSchönes Foto, aber die Perspektive sollte korrigiert werden, weil sich die Bäume nach innen neigen. --Manfred Kuzel 09:31, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture, but CA too strong for a QI --Dktue 13:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose per Dktue.--Peulle 06:58, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose CA, barrel distortion, noisy dark areas, sky partially overexposed (colour channel clipping). This high contrast motif was too much for the small sensor. Very nice composition, though. --Smial 09:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 00:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Vslaeum,_Ulm_(_1050055).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Potted plants at Verschwörhaus Ulm --MB-one 13:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Die Blätter der linken Pflanze müssten schärfer sein, und die rechte sieht nicht gesund aus. Außerdem wirken die Plastiktöpfe nicht gut und der Hintergrund ist leicht schief. -- Spurzem 19:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment: Diskutieren kann man hier einzig und allein über die Schärfe der Blätter. Ob eine Pflanze gesund ist oder nicht und ob sie in einem Plastiktopf oder im Garten steht, hat nichts mit der Qualität eines Fotos zu tun. Ähnliches gilt bei einer Nahaufnahme für den ohnehin unscharfen Hintergrund, weil es hier einzig und allein um das Motiv (die Pflanzen) geht. --Manfred Kuzel 08:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Das stimmt nicht so ganz. Auch wenn Getaltungsaspekt hier sicherlich weniger bedeutsam sind als bei FPC, so gilt trotzdem: "The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed." --Smial 13:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Volle Zustimmung zu Manfred. Hier geht es um die Fotos. --Aristeas 06:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Worum sollte es sonst gehen als um Fotos? Qualität von Fotos ist meines Erachtens aber nicht allein eine Frage von Schärfe, abgesehen davon, dass sie in dem zur Diskussion stehenden Bild nicht einwandfrei ist. Und noch eine Frage, auch an Manfred Kuzel: Warum habt Ihr dem Foto hier kein Pro gegeben? Vergessen? -- Spurzem 09:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Low DOF, distracting background. --Smial 18:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
SupportGood quality. Hier ist mein Pro, Spurzem. --M@nfred (talk) 05:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Per others, --Cvmontuy 02:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined ----Seven Pandas 00:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:2019-07-01_(105)_Argynnis_paphia_(silver-washed_fritillary)_on_a_Phedimus_aizoon_(aizoon_stonecrop)_at_Bichlhäusl,_Tiefgrabenrotte,_Frankenfels,_Austria.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Argynnis paphia (silver-washed fritillary) on a Phedimus aizoon (aizoon stonecrop) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 06:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Gorgeous colors. Great composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Is this really a QI? Everything and nothing is in focus. No butterfly is really sharp. Some are flapping their wings. Colors seem a little off. --Pro2 19:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Somewhat blurry. There are several overexposed areas. Colors look unnatural, especially the greens. --Stoxastikos (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined ----Seven Pandas 00:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:AMW.svg
[edit]- Nomination By User:Poznaniak --Piotr Bart 12:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry but I think this is not similar enough to the original. Small details like the shadowing on the wings and legs might be forgiven, but the letters, crown and lines in the structure the eagle stands on - these are all different.--Peulle 17:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be similar to be a quality image. --Piotr Bart 08:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I feel it needs to be an accurate depiction of the logo. This, then, becomes a CR discussion about how dissimilar the image can be from the original.--Peulle 21:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 00:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:The_Northeastern_Corner_Round_Tower2.JPG
[edit]- Nomination The Northeastern Corner Round Tower, Tobolsk Kremlin, Russia. --СССР 00:15, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Hmmmm I think we should discuss this; the image seems a bit underexposed.--Peulle 07:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment The image would definitely be (even) better if it was a bit brighter. Should be easy to correct, just dont’ clip the highlights. --Aristeas 07:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Done: brightened --СССР 02:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Still too dark for me. --Rbrechko 23:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Done: brightened more --СССР 04:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Support Good for me now. --Aristeas 06:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Halo is way too strong. --Pro2 11:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 00:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Préfecture_du_Haut-Rhin_(1)_-_sans_lumière.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Prefecture of Haut-Rhin without light in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 12:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
SupportGood quality. --Cvmontuy 01:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
I disagree This image is underexposed by at least 1/2 f-stop, probably one f-stop. --Smial 11:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Oppose
Neutral Smial is right that the image would be better (nicer) if lifted by about 1/2 to 1 f-stop. On the other hand, this seems to be a blue hour photograph, and the blue hour is dark, so one could argue that the brightness (darkness) of the image is just reality. --Aristeas 07:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment It's a series of photos taken at one minute intervals (with File:Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (2) - avec lumière.jpg and File:Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (3) - avec lumière bleue.jpg), the settings are the same, actually the first is less exposed because no light on the building. Gzen92 [discuter] 06:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Done I changed the brightness. Gzen92 [discuter] 09:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Seven Pandas 00:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:PuertoPuntadelEste-jul2019.4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of Punta del Este, Uruguay --Ezarate 22:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Decline *
Dark, noisy, perspective not corrected, maybe tilted. --Dirtsc 06:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)OpposeOverall insufficient quality.
*@Dirtsc: see now, please Ezarate 22:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Comment Ezarate should have put this image to CR by himself after it was first rejected by me and then reworked. As this was not done, I put it to CR, to have more opinions. I'm still not convinced, it is better now, but now has slight CAs on the edges of the buildings. Greetings --Dirtsc 07:28, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- CA fixed, thanks Ezarate 11:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Support looks good now --Dirtsc 08:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I appreciate the rework done but IMO, the image still seems dark and a little soft to me. --GRDN711 19:05, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose there is a stitching problem on the building on the left --Moroder 06:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose The perspective is skewed (the buildings on the left and right sides of the picture are leaning outwards). The image lacks contrast. --Stoxastikos 16:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Seven Pandas 00:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)