Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 20 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:St_Julian_church_in_St-Julien-de-Toursac_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Julian church in Saint-Julien-de-Toursac, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Was the photo taken just before a thunderstorm or is it underexposed? In addition, the building looks very distorted despite the vertical lines. Please discuss whether the photo is still a QI. -- Spurzem 14:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Does not look too distorted for me. Could be a bit brighter (uses only ca. 90 % of the available brightness range), but still ok. --Plozessor 05:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Not very bad distortion but just a little to much. So per Spurzem. --Augustgeyler 07:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 20:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Nieten_einer_im_Abbau_befindlichen_Stahlbrücke.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rivets of a 100-year-old steel bridge under deconstruction. --Augustgeyler 12:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose A large part of the picture is not in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 03:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for reviewing. You might be right. But as this focus decision was intentional to show these old rivets in that nightly situation just before demolishing I'd like to here some more opinions. --Augustgeyler 15:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The low DoF contributes to the atmosphere of the picture, thus ok IMO. --Plozessor 05:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Plozessor --Kritzolina 13:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The denoising could have been a bit milder, but low DOF is clearly intentional and ok in this case. --Smial 14:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Plozessor, indeed the low DoF leads to a clear increase in atmosphere. – Aristeas 13:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 16:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Hauptplatz_27_in_Enns_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Building at Hauptplatz 27 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately the building looks too distorted due too intense perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 22:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Perspective is ok here IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 05:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Neutral It looks like the building is wider at the top than at the bottom. Is that really the case? Further it seems a bit dark. -- Spurzem 13:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler -- Екатерина Борисова 18:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Info slightly distorted and slightly dark --Georgfotoart 11:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Sebring12Hrs -- ReneeWrites 00:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Perspective still OK in my eyes. – Aristeas 13:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Aristeas although it could be a bit brigther Poco a poco 18:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)