Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 13 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Maulavern_Kellergasse,_Zellerndorf-6252.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Maulavern In Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel) by Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Isiwal 20:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Unfortunate light conditions and imo unfortunate composition, sorry --Moroder 08:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree. This are the light conditions except midday. The compositon demonstrates the situation between the vinyard in the background and the press-houses and cellars in the foreground. --Hubertl 09:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
    • I meant the bright spot on the left up front (looks overexposed) disturbs a lot the composition --Moroder 06:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
      • I checked it, there is no overexposure - but indeed a high exposure range to manage for the sensor - and from our point of view were we made this pictures together and discussed the compositions intensively, this image is one of the most interesting of all. Especially because of this shadow/light game. But, of course, we can and will accept your complaints. --Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 09:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Moroder. -- Smial 08:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very unfortunate light. -- Spurzem 10:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz 190 SL, Bj. 1959 (2016-07-02 Sp).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz 190 SL from 1959 -- Spurzem 18:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. (Ich erahne rotes Leder drinnen? *seufz*) --Smial 19:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please check for CAs at the front of the car. --XRay 03:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment In 100% view there is no disturbing CA. Zooming to 800% of course let us find some. But if I'd look at every image at 800% or more, I could not support any one image, because I'd find issues in every image made by real world cameras and lenses. -- Smial 09:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment You don't need 800%. I've added a note for the part with visible CAs. --XRay 17:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support It´s ok for me, as Smial. --Hubertl 06:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support per others --Milseburg 07:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see problems --Livioandronico2013 19:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Gorki-museum-1606.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ganshin manor --PereslavlFoto 18:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality for me, this blue sky is ok.--Marrovi 05:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's a sharp photo but perspective is far from acceptable andv sky is not natural, so discussion --Michielverbeek 18:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective overcorrected and WB IMHO too blue. --C messier 09:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective correction seems to be somewhat overdone. WB has been set to the artificial lighting (probably halogen lamps). So the lit foreground appears natural, but the sky and the buildings in the background have massive blue cast. If taking photos in the blue hour in most cases it is recommended to use daylight WB to get a pleasant result. -- Smial 09:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unnatural light; CA in the trees. --Peulle 12:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective and light are not good. -- Spurzem 15:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)