Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 11 2013

• 
  • Nomination West facade of the Maximilianeum (Bavarian parliament) in Munich. --High Contrast 20:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tagetes covered with dew.--
    Famberhorst 17:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Florian Fuchs 17:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rest of synagogue in Lippstadt at backyard. --Achim Raschka 17:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion sorry for german. Sehr hartes Licht, in der Voransicht kontra. Aber in Vollansicht siehts anders aus, das Auto ist unwichtig. --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trolley ZiU-682 in Podolsk (near Moscow), Russia. --A.Savin 17:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hut on the Seiseralm - elevation 1740 m. --Moroder 17:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Florian Fuchs 17:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cupola of the Gaumont-Opéra (built 1866), Paris, 9th arr., France. --JLPC 16:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 17:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Floating dock in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sitninskaya street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 17:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Petri in Hamburg, aerial view (by User:Jean11)) --Achim Raschka 15:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial at German KZ Bergen-Belsen (by User:Losch) --Achim Raschka 15:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jastrow 16:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The television tower Torre de Collserola on the Tibidabo hill in Barcelona. -- Felix Koenig 14:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --A.Savin 17:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hierothyteion, site of Kameiros, Rhodes --Bgag 13:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose sorry, look at the sky, it is pixelated, looks like digital zoom or over-process to me --A.Savin 17:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hierothyteion, site of Kameiros, Rhodes --Bgag 13:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ladenburg am Neckar, Hauptstraße 49 --Berthold Werner 08:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hydroelcric power plant at Västland former ironworks, Sweden.--V-wolf 08:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. (and IMHO the white clouds are no reason to decline ;-) --Berthold Werner 09:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coromandel Marsh Dart Ceriagrion coromandelianum (male) --JDP90 07:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Hercules fontain by Nicodemus Tessin the younger, in front of the Drottningholm Palace, with the Adriaen de Vries sculpture "Hercules in battle with the dragon on top. --ArildV 05:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Maybe you can adjust the lateral crop. --Moroder 06:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drottningholm palace church. --ArildV 05:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Nice. --Moroder 06:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower at castle Tüßling --Aconcagua 05:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Some irrelevant CA --Moroder 10:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vézoles Lake. Prémian, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion I suggest to reduce the blue channel a bit, otherwise OK --A.Savin 17:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC) Done Blue chanel reduced a bit --Christian Ferrer 17:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
    Good now.  Support --A.Savin 18:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vézoles Lake. Fraisse-sur-Agout, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 13:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of oil storage tanks in the port of Hamburg --Dirtsc 05:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Vassil 06:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of barges in the port of Hamburg --Dirtsc 05:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the museum ship "Cap San Diego" in Hamburg --Dirtsc 05:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Weak support a bit blown, just OK for QI though --A.Savin 16:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of a part of the "Speicherstadt" (historical warehouse complex) in Hamburg --Dirtsc 05:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Vassil 06:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fossil shell of a worm snail, Thylacodes arenarius --Llez 04:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --JDP90 07:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quentin Beunardeau (Le Mans FC), goalkeeper of the France U-19 footballteam. --Steindy 22:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Larry Azouni (Olympique Marseille), player of the France U-19 footballteam. --Steindy 22:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Souahilo Meïté (AJ Auxerre), player of the France U-19 footballteam. --Steindy 22:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grégorie Lherbier (OSC Lille), player of the France U-19 footballteam. --Steindy 22:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eva Jantschitsch at Austrian Film Awards 2013. --Tsui 22:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aysgarth Falls. Mattbuck 06:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:251, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1992 stock at West Ruislip. Mattbuck 06:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Blurred --Christian Ferrer 05:251, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aysgarth Falls. Mattbuck 06:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:251, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Palau Nacional, Montjuïc, Barcelona. -- Felix Koenig 19:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Byōdō-in's Phoenix Hall is a Japan's National Treasure --663highland 13:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination: US 101 in the Mendocino County --Adbar 16:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Review Looks as if done from a running car. Not very sharp. --Dirtsc 12:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
    It seems okish to me. Mattbuck 18:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

File:U-19 EC-Qualifikation Austria vs. France 2013-06-10 (059).jpg

• Nomination U-19 Austria vs. France: Marcel Sabitzer (SK Rapid Wien, red shirt) in duel with Larry Azouni (Olympique Marseille) --Steindy 21:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose - distracting arm, CA, noisy, overexposed. VI maybe but not QI. Mattbuck 21:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
   Comment Okay, next time I'll tell the player during the match, that he must not run into the picture. Where the image is overexposed, remains your secret. white and remains white because you can not change anything and the CA is designed. --Steindy 21:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

  No need to be snippy. Not every circumstance can yield a QI, and while I accept that sports photography is difficult, the fact remains that the arm spoils the composition and so means it is not QI. It happens. Mattbuck 21:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
  I'm not snippy, but you should know about you are wrtiting. Therefore I jave withdrawn my cendidate. According to your criteria, only some sports images are quality images. Once you look at a sports newspaper. --Steindy 22:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

I don't quite know what you mean, but frankly the "only some (sports) images are quality images" applies to ANY subject. Mattbuck 22:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:U-19 EC-Qualifikation Austria vs. France 2013-06-10 (060).jpg

• Nomination U-19 Austria vs. France: Marcel Sabitzer (SK Rapid Wien, red shirt) in duel with Larry Azouni (Olympique Marseille) --Steindy 21:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose - noisy, overexposed. VI maybe but not QI. Mattbuck 21:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
   Comment Where the image is overexposed, remains your secret. white and remains white because you can not change anything. The noise comes from because it is a football match with fast movements and no stationary train at a railway station. --Steindy 21:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

  As above, I do not doubt that sports photography of this kind is difficult, and certain accommodations can be made, but basic things like avoiding overexposure are really not optional for QI. Mattbuck 21:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
  You should know about you are wrtiting. Therefore I jave withdrawn my cendidate. According to your criteria, only some sports images are quality images. Once you look at a sports newspaper. --Steindy 22:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Wetterkreuz_am_Schlern.jpg

• Nomination Weather cross on the Schlern mountain. --Moroder 12:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose too soft, especially the cross is out of focus --A.Savin 12:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment It is technically impossible with f/11, see the note. What is wrong with a photo beeing soft? IMO it's his beauty. Thanks for the comments anyway --Moroder 13:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
   Oppose And not enough sharp --Christian Ferrer 18:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   A.Savin 16:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Prunella_vulgaris_-_harilik_käbihein.jpg

• Nomination Common self-heal (Prunella vulgaris). --Iifar 19:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
• Promotion Good. -- Trace 20:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
   Comment Ok, I don't want problems. The background is not noisy, but the flower has noise. The dof can be better (f:9, but 1/200). There are little but important areas overexposed. But I don't want problems (I can write notes about this). Not QI for me --Lmbuga 00:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
   Comment I'm sure that I can't take pictures of plants betters than your excellents photos; but I'm sure that you can take better pictures than this--Lmbuga 00:14, 5 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment 1/200 was because of wind, noise is imho at minimum level. I already did my best here. --Iifar 09:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
   QI for me. Because of good quality and high encyclopedic value, good quality : -- Trace 13:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  I hardly understand your point of view about overexposed areas : to me they are very very small, absolutely harmless, and the picture is detailed enough to help recognizing this species. So no doubt for me : QI !-- Trace 11:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
  
• PLEASE DON'T WRITE IN MY WORDS ( your edition in my words has been reverted): A COMMENT IT'S A COMMENT, IT'S NOT A VOTE: RESPECT ME:  Neutral--Lmbuga 22:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

It was Iifar who voted and not me. See the link in his discussion page--Lmbuga 23:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Español: En mi opinión, debe ser bloqueado: No todo vale--Lmbuga 23:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

es No vuelvo a editar en las fotos de este individuo. Yo no soy nadie para decirle lo que él ha de hacer. Aún así, deseo aclarar que el hecho de que una foto permita reconocer perfectamente una planta no quiere decir que la foto sea VI, QI o FP. El razonamiento de Trace es absurdo, aunque probablemente bien intencionado: ¿Cuántas fotos de insectos han sido rechazadas viéndose claramente el insecto que es?,...--Lmbuga 02:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

•  Info This will be my last post on this page. Since I'm untrustworthy and bad person (who even needs to be blocked from using Commons), I will leave QIC page for good. Thank you all for your cooperation! --Iifar 14:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
• Weak  Support For me its okay. --Steindy 22:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Weak support The leaf at the bottom bothers me a bit. A tighter-cropped pic would have my unreserved support. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good. -- Smial 13:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   A.Savin 16:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Struttura molecolare di una zeolite.png

• Nomination Molecular structure of a zeolite -- Yiyi 23:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC) )
• Promotion  Comment I'ld prefer an SVG-File here --Martin Kraft 08:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC
•  Support i prefer PNG, not SVG. This picture is good and QI. --Ralf Roletschek 11:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   A.Savin 16:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)