Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 07 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Cynthia Barcomi Wikipedia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cynthia Barcomi --Denis Apel 13:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the image is too bright. -- Spurzem 14:48, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Nothing burnt, easily fixable. Maybe acceptable as it is. Please discuss. --C messier 12:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Hand crop in this kind of portrait not acceptable. --Cccefalon 04:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I withdraw my support, Cccefalon, is right about the bad crop. --C messier 14:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry too bad framing.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Двухэтажка.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Canyon of the Tsitse river in Caucasian Biosphere Reserve, Russia. By User:Synaps-s --Ilya 11:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 11:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I could agree, but for an easy to take landscape photo, this is much too small resolution imo. --Cccefalon 15:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
    @Cccefalon: higher resolution uploaded --Antanana 21:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
    It is significantly overprocessed. Please have a look at the mountain ridges, for example. --Cccefalon 09:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, IMHO.--Sergei Kazantsev 08:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp and oversharpened, sadly the higher resolution isn't any better than the previous version --A.Savin 12:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    @A.Savin: You are right, the previous version was better.--KSK (talk) 10:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hans Haase 11:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with A. Savin in full resolution the current version shows lots of artifacts. --C messier 14:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice mood, but image is overprocessed. --Iifar 17:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Laach Lake. It is a volcanic caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, about 24 km (15 mi) northwest of Koblenz and 37 km (23 mi) south of Bonn -- Spurzem 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Nice and moodful image. But according to QI criteria I have to deny it: Burnt hightlights and a lot of pure black. Probably a fill flash had compensate the high contrast situation. English description is missing on the file description page. --Tuxyso 18:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment OK. So unterschiedlich sind die Auffassungen von guten und grottenschlechten Bildern. Außerdem: Seit wann ist eine englische Beschreibung beim Bild vorgeschrieben? -- Spurzem 19:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Sie ist nicht vorgeschrieben, nur wenn du dir schon die Mühe machst und das Bild hier auf Englisch beschreibst, ist es im Sinne von Commons als Medienarchiv nur sinnvoll die Beschreibung auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite zu integrieren. Ich habe ja geschrieben, dass ich das Bild sehr schön und stimmungsvoll finde, den QI-Kriterien genügt es aber dennoch nicht. Setze einfach auf Discuss, um weitere Meinungen einzuholen. --Tuxyso 18:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support for me it´s QI. --Hubertl 02:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Hubertl --Palauenc05 11:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Shiva_temple_at_Puthia_01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: The Bhubaneshwar Shiva Temple of Puthia is the largest Shiva temple in Bangladesh. It was built in 1823 by Rani Bhubonmoyee Devi. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support --Palauenc05 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, good quality picture! --Hans Haase 15:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With an additional review, it´s not QI. Its too unsharp, blurry and too, artefacts in the sky --Hubertl 10:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bara_Ahnik_Mandir_at_Puthia.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination: Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia, constructed by the Char Ani Rajas of Puthia estate. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support --Palauenc05 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA in the trees and loss of fine details. Never a QI! --Cccefalon 19:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hans Haase 11:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong chromatic aberration on the right side and lack of fine detail. --Iifar 17:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's too tight IMHO, it needs lead room. If the uploader has kept the original it can be easily fixed. --C messier 11:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. --Palauenc05 14:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too tight crop, the spoiler is barely within frame. Easily fixable if the uploader has kept the original. --C messier 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem --Palauenc05 14:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)