Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 05 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination An 8 mm long shell of the snail Mastonia rubra --Llez 04:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A playground flooded by the Ohio River. --GuavaTrain 03:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Ottmanach #2, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Margaret in Ottmanach, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle chapel Holy Trinity and Saint Nicholas in Portendorf, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pergola of the castle chapel Holy Trinity and Saint Nicholas in Portendorf, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fragment of a grave inscription at the castle chapel Holy Trinity and Saint Nicholas in Portendorf, Magdalensberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An island in Trustom Pond in the fog --Rhododendrites 01:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cumulus clouds in Russia. --Knopik-som 01:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix caprea. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 01:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix caprea. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 01:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A split Zero bar. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 19:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A split Snickers Egg. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 19:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. Possible FP? I'm not sure. -- Ikan Kekek 22:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyards and the edge of the forest at Riedern near Höpfigheim, Steinheim an der Murr, Germany. --Aristeas 15:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silhouette of a dying apple tree before sunset sky and landscape near Beilstein, Germany. Yes, only the tree is sharp, but this was intentional ;–): I wanted a soft background for the tree silhouette, to catch the atmosphere. --Aristeas 15:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Not easy to judge with QI criterias but still a good pic. --Selbymay 15:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russia. Manhole covers. --Knopik-som 10:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alchemilla vulgaris. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alchemilla vulgaris. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acer platanoides. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acer platanoides. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:03, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teepavillon des Weinguts Bürklin-Wolf in der Ruppertsberger Weinlage: Hohe Burg, Mittelhaardt, Rheinland-Pfalz. --Fischer.H 09:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination French singer Zazie on stage & under the rain, 2019 Papillons de nuit festival in Saint-Laurent de Cuves, Normandy, France. --Selbymay 07:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Some CA visible. --Steindy 17:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Oppose Too dark. --GuavaTrain 03:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Lake Tyin, Innlandet, Norway --Carsten Steger 06:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial image of the New Palace Herrenchiemsee, Germany --Carsten Steger 06:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neumarkt in Gotha, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the building at Markt 6 in Alsfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old city hall of Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, nice and good light. --Aristeas 10:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Markt 7 in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Am Markt 14 in Bad Hersfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wild turkey crossing the road near Trustom Pond --Rhododendrites 22:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment Why did the turkey cross the road? But seriously, I'd identify this as a female turkey in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 23:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
done. Rhododendrites 12:55, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of Predigerhaus at Nikolaikirchhof 3 in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 20:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commode around 1775 (Paris).--Pline 14:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Question Is it possible to fix the perspective without cropping? It's a bit of a tight shot. Rodhullandemu 14:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Done --Pline 07:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Support Good enough for me. Rodhullandemu 08:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mediterranean Sea near Costa del Sol --Kallerna 06:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Could be any sea anywhere. Lacks value in that sense. -- GuavaTrain 02:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moussier's redstart (Phoenicurus moussieri) male --Charlesjsharp 09:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The head doesn’t have the best sharpness, sorry. --Nefronus 08:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Air Greenland Bell 212 helicopter (OY-HCY) at Kulusuk Airport (KUS), Eastern Greenland on August 24, 2017. --GRDN711 00:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Air Greenland Bell 212 helicopter (OY-HCY) at Kulusuk Airport (KUS), Eastern Greenland on August 24, 2017. --GRDN711 23:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction of a bridge over the Tad Pha waterfall, Laos.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gerhard Zallinger, athletic coach of Austria. --Steindy 20:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: F2 boards, Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 19:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wilhelm Kohlhoff street in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Chegemsky waterfall. The upper part. Kabardino-Balkaria. Russia --Александр Байдуков 12:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Boundary stone in Beckingen, Saarland By User:LoKiLeCh --DavidJRasp 10:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Some bits are overexposed, but overall good quality for me. Please just fix the cw tilt. --Domob 13:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose
Not done --Nefronus 16:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Ribadeo (Lugo, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 08:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Verticals should be straight. A shot from a longer distance would have been helpful. Look at other pictures in that category. --Palauenc05 09:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose
Not done --Nefronus 16:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fomes fomentarius on a birch trunk. The northern coast of the Neva Bay: Primorsky district, St. Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 10:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment Overexposition on the left side of the mushroom + the sunny part sorry. --Nefronus 21:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC) *
Info On the left side of the mushroom is not overexposure, but such a color of the surface, a white spot. Such spots are not uncommon in Fomes fomentarius ––Александр Байдуков 08:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
I’ve added a note, it just looks to me like there are areas of light solid color on the mushroom + background. --Nefronus 19:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Oppose Per above. --Nefronus 16:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:MilitaryCemeteryUkanc06.jpg
[edit]- Nomination From 1915 to 1917, the Cemetery in Ukanc was mainly used for Austro-Hungarian soldiers killed in the Krn mountain range. Many soldiers were of Hungarian nationality. --Miha Peče 12:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 18:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I disagree. Front Window is in focus. --Miha Peče 19:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Support Good use of depth of field per the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
* The detail on the metal grid is somewhat lacking, but overall it’s a good photo. --Nefronus
12:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Weak support
- Weak
Support Somewhat agressive noise reduction, otherwise good. -- Smial 13:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Left vertical lines are not straight. Agressive noise reduction: Not sharp enough. Avoidable (improvable) horizontal distortion IMO--Lmbuga 03:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Weak oppose I change my vote per Lmbuga. --Nefronus 07:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
File:2020_year._Herbarium._Oak._img-007.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Oak. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 01:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Insufficient DoF --Tagooty 02:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support DoF good enough for me. Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support ok for me --Uoaei1 04:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Meets the requirements ––Александр Байдуков 20:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose low DOF and unsharp. Seven Pandas 22:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Support--Lmbuga 03:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:White-tailed_eagle_in_flight_at_Falkenhof_Schloss_Rosenburg.jpg
[edit]- Nomination White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in flight, Falkenhof Schloss Rosenburg, Germany --Carsten Steger 16:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Sorry, but the wings are cutted. --Steindy 18:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment The intention of this photo was to capture the head of the eagle in flight in as much detail as possible -- Carsten Steger 19:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Good eyes and IMO good composition--Lmbuga 22:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Lmbuga.--Ermell 08:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per Steindy. --Fischer.H 16:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Weak support Per Lmbuga (detail could be better and the beak looks a bit overexposed, but since it’s a flight photo, I think it’s good enough). --Nefronus 12:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Lmbuga. --Smial 16:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Lmbuga. --Knopik-som 13:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:48, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
==
[edit]- Nomination Interior of the reformed church in Langnau, Switzerland --Domob 13:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Light range too much. Windows and benches on the right are overexposed. --Tagooty 05:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Yes indeed, unfortunately there is nothing I can do about it; even my darkest exposure has these small areas overexposed already. I think the picture could still be QI since the areas are small and most of the picture worked out quite well under this extreme dynamic range (the sun was shining right through the central windows), but this is your call. --Domob 08:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Everything is very good except for the burned areas. It would certainly be better to take the photo on a cloudy day. But in the end I think it’s good enough. It can be taken to the discussion if needed… --Nefronus 19:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Light range too much. Windows and benches on the right are overexposed. --Tagooty 02:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Nefronus and Domob's comments. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Dluga_2_in_Bydgoszcz_(1).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Building at Dluga 2 in Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. --Tournasol7 06:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment If you pull it apart a bit, it looks more natural. On the right side, something sticks out into the frame. --Ermell 22:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Too significant perspective correction for me, the building looks like having no roof, sorry. --Nefronus 08:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Support I disagree, perspective is ok for me. --Sebring12Hrs 11:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Support OK for me. Yes, the perspective is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 17:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:44, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:St. Luke the Evangelist - Pacecco de Rosa.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: St. Luke the Evangeslist - Pacecco de Rosa --Commonists 18:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpening artefacts everywhere, and in upper parts also some chromatic noise. --A.Savin 22:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per A. Savin. --Nefronus 06:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- New --Commonists 12:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Support The new version is much better. --Palauenc05 21:39, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per A. Savin.--Lmbuga 13:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Support The new version is OK. --Aristeas 06:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 09:59, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:The_Fat_Bull,_Ashton-in-Makerfield.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Closed pub on the A49 Warrington Road opposite St Thomas's church, Ashton-in-Makerfield. --Rodhullandemu 18:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Steindy 21:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Better? Rodhullandemu 06:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Support ok for me.--Ermell 07:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support OK for me. --Aristeas 17:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Manchester_Row,_Vulcan_Village_2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View north along Manchester Row, Vulcan Village from Wargrave Road --Rodhullandemu 08:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Chromatic abberation in the shadow part. --Steindy 22:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Where? Rodhullandemu 06:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Support, as it looks OK to me, pending Steindy's reply. -- Ikan Kekek 07:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment I think you'll wait a while. Steindy seems to be a "fly-by" objector who just tanks nominations without reconsidering potential improvements. He's certainly supported subsequent nominations without reconsidering this one. Maybe he's just too busy. Rodhullandemu 22:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Steindy has now annotated the image. Call me a blind, wizened old fool, but I just can't see it. Can anyone else? And if it's in shadow, how much does it matter? Rodhullandemu 18:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment I thought he might be referring to something like that. I'm not convinced they're aberrations, but I also don't care per Aristeas' remarks. -- Ikan Kekek 19:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Support CAs hardly visible. --Palauenc05 08:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Support I see these CAs ;–), but IMHO they are really minor and not irritating. --Aristeas 15:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment I see some chroma noise, not relevant CA. This can be improved with suitable tools, such as NeatImage, which is probably also available for Photoshop or has even been integrated into it in the meantime. --Smial 13:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:AUT_vs._TUR_2016-03-29_(383).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Çağlar Söyüncü, footballplaer of Turkey. --Steindy 21:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Poor composition, crop to left, slightly wider shot would have been better. Rodhullandemu 21:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Let's hear other votes please. --Steindy 22:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per User:Rodhullandemu. --Nefronus 19:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Support But the face is in the middle.--Ermell 07:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support And there is lead room on the right. --Aristeas 17:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Crops might not be ideal, but what a facial expression! Good portrait, overall, in my opinion, and in context, I think the crops are good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 17:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas, esp. the aspect of a 'lead room'. --Palauenc05 12:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Skazsky_gorge_near_the_alpine_camp._View_in_the_north-west_direction.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Skazsky gorge near the alpine camp. View in the north-west direction. North Ossetian Reserve: North Ossetia. Russia --Александр Байдуков 03:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose The detail looks posterized, sorry. --Nefronus 07:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Support I disagree --Moroder 02:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Nefronus, could you please specify where I should be seeing posterization? I'm not seeing it. -- Ikan Kekek 16:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment I’ve added two notes into the image. Nefronus 17:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Comment Thanks. I see what you're talking about. I think this still might be a QI, but it's hard for me to avoid concentrating on the details now, perhaps to the detriment of the effect of the whole, so I'll wait until at least tomorrow before looking again. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per Nefronus. I have no idea which sharpening and which denoising algorithm has struck here, but the image looks badly overprocessed in large parts. --Smial 12:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 20:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Support QI for me.--Ermell 07:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Palauenc05 and Ermell --GRDN711 16:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Cygne_tuberculé_juvénile_(Cygnus_olor)_(27).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Juvenile mute swan (Cygnus olor) in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 09:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Oppose one bird facing away --Charlesjsharp 21:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Nice photograph. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Per Charlesjsparp + there should be more space on the right with the bird heading there (not well composed)… Nefronus 06:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Weak oppose
Support --Commonists 09:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
--Lmbuga 22:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)Weak oppose Per Nefronus
Weak support The objections against the composition are correct, but IMHO for QI the photo is still OK. --Aristeas 07:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Support
If you slightly crop in to get rid of the downs, I'll support.--MB-one 20:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Done Cropping. Gzen92 08:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Support Significantly better after the crop. Nefronus 21:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Nefronus - I think it's good enough now. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per Nefronus--Lmbuga 13:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Support per MB-one --GRDN711 15:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 9 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)