Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 03 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Église_Saint-Rémy_de_Vaux_-_Clocher.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bell-tower view from D6A (Vaux/Moselle) --Tehkni 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please remove the dust spots and check the verticals. --Ermell 22:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
    Nice catch. Removed dust spots and modified perspective. --Tehkni 07:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
     Support Looks fine to me. Rodhullandemu 13:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The blurry branches on the right really bug me but probably wouldn't be considered a sufficient reason to oppose. The clocktower is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 18:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mdaniels5757 22:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. --Aristeas 07:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 19:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:In_the_Elbrus_National_Park.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Category "Specially protected natural territories of Russia". In the Elbrus National Park. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Александр Байдуков 15:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Oversharpened, especially the bottom --Michielverbeek 17:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, sharpness seems good to me. --Mdaniels5757 01:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the sky and clouds look overprocessed to me. --S.Hinakawa 08:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support it's ok --Sandro Halank 15:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, too unsharp, noisy, dust spots, IMO oversaturated, halos, oversharpened. --XRay 05:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question Where are you seeing dust spots? -- Ikan Kekek 22:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I've added a note. At the note are three clear dust spots. --XRay 06:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Small but clearly seen when I look in that area. -- Ikan Kekek 07:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay. Tournasol7 02:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Kastanienblüte_IMG_7169.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Edelkastanienblüte in Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 16:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. I thought on this for a while as it's a striking and beautiful picture, and I did not want to reject it, but the depth of field is far too shallow. Sorry. --Blood Red Sandman 12:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, I like the depth of field here; it's part of why it's striking. --Mdaniels5757 01:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Blood Red Sandman, sorry --Sandro Halank 16:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I found the composition very nice --Cvmontuy 04:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support In the macro area, depth of field necessarily becomes very very thin. As I don’t think we should require focus stacking for QI, the image is OK for me. --Aristeas 07:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 19:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Порецкое_лесничество_(р._Иночь).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Poretsky forestry (Inoch river) --Yutskovskiy 20:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Please ensure the image is properly categorised ("Protected areas of Russia" is too broad, "Protected areas of Russia/5010142" is a red link). --S.Hinakawa 19:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
  • I corrected the categories. Please check. --Yutskovskiy 20:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question Could you help the photographer by saying why it's not OK? My thought is, if you know the name of the lake or pond, that should be in the description. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Nevermind - Inoch River is in the Russian caption. -- Ikan Kekek 04:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 20:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question Is there a category for Inoch River? If not, perhaps you should create one. -- Ikan Kekek 04:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 01:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ночная_вершина_горы_Шелудивая_(Зеленая).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Ganzikov 09:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Proper image description needed --MB-one 13:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Description is not o.k. --Ermell 12:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support What's wrong with the description? It seems fine to me. I think there should be more categories, though - surely, there's some kind of night panorama category. In terms of the photo, the question would be whether the sharpness is adequate. Not at full size, but I think it's good enough at a large enough size to be OK. So I'll support, pending the addition of one or more appropriate categories. -- Ikan Kekek 21:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: The description on the file page may be sufficient, the nomination's description ("Wiki Loves Earth 2020") is certainly not. --MB-one 10:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Right, but we're not voting on that. -- Ikan Kekek 18:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 19:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Praha_Dejvice_Sabachuv_park_fontana_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fountain with horse statues, Dejvice, Prague, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 10:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Needs a perspective correction to get verticals vertical --Poco a poco 10:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done although not convinced about the need or improvement --JiriMatejicek 07:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Now is overcorrected and there is some tilt, also the top left corner needs a crop. If you disagree with my comments you can insist on getting a promoted the way it's via the CR section --Poco a poco 11:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not overcorrected, rather not-fully-corrected. While the vertical lines in the back are not all perfectly vertical, I think it's good enough; didn't want to perfectionize the background at the expense of distorting the horse in the front. --JiriMatejicek 11:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Do you believe that the building at the left is vertical? Poco a poco 21:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment And I would recommend to crop the bottom. --Palauenc05 06:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done perspective correction redone + more severe crop --JiriMatejicek 12:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable now. --Palauenc05 12:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mdaniels5757 21:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support QI now Poco a poco 08:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 19:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)