Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 02 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Castildetierra_-_Summer_morning.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Castildetierra, symbol of the Barenas Reales desert, in Navarra, Spain --Ant°AM 07:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Yet dustspots visible. --Cccefalon 16:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 Support --Cccefalon 08:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I see only a very good image. -- Spurzem 10:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Siehe unten. Bis der Fehler behoben ist, noch kein Pro. -- Spurzem 16:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
    After removing spots now Pro for me again. -- Spurzem 06:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 Comment Also entweder bist Du tatsächlich blind oder man muss Dir Böswilligkeit unterstellen. --Cccefalon 10:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
@Cccefalon: Halte Dich bitte ein bisschen zurück. Ich habe ernsthaft nach dem Fleck gesucht und ihn nicht gefunden, mache mir aber auch nicht die Mühe noch einmal zu suchen. -- Spurzem 12:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
@Spurzem: EXtra für dich annotiert. Sieht man schon in der Vorschau. --Cccefalon 12:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
@Cccefalon: Tatsächlich; danke. Ich hatte nach einem kleinen dunklen Punkt gesucht. -- Spurzem 12:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until big dust spot is removed. --Smial 11:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Full  Support. Impressive landscape, impressive image. -- Smial 07:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Marrovi 13:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dust spots. --Peulle 21:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks for your feedback, I removed dustspots in the sky in a new version --Ant°AM 04:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. --Basotxerri 07:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Palazzo_Bembo_e_riva_sinistra_del_Canal_Grande_Venezia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Palazzo Bembo in Venice. Facade on Grand Canal. --Moroder 10:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment
  •  Comment Lots of sky, but it's nice and clean, no noise or posterization that I can see. The main subject look fair enough, but I'm a little worried about the perspective in the left side of the image, can anything be done about that? Prime example: see note on the top left chimney. --Peulle 12:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Perspective in these venetian buildings is always a hard guess or an average of lines falling in all directions. This is my best guess. The chimney as many elevated structures as you see mostly on towers are distorted through perspective correction and that has been accepted from the QIC community since long. Thanks for the comments and best regards --Moroder 15:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment I agree with Moroder here. Let's hear what others say.  Support --Cayambe 06:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Of course such wide angel perspective has severe problems in image corners. But here it is not really disturbing. Very nice composition and lighting. --Smial 12:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support We have our own Canaletto I think ! it is possible to correct the chimney, and only the chimney...--Jebulon 15:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   -- Smial 12:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Florence_Italy_Santa-Maria-del-Fiore-01.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajshahi_College_Administrative_Building.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rajshahi College is the third oldest institutions of higher education in Bangladesh. --Nahid.rajbd 13:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perspective correction needed. --MartinThoma 14:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC) (@Nahid.rajbd: You could try to fix the perspective. This could also remove the top branch. --MartinThoma (talk) 07:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC))
  •  Oppose I disagree. Not good for 2 mpix, perspective correction needed. --A.Savin 19:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small resolution for this kind of motif. Perspective issues. lack of fine details. --Cccefalon 05:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 Comment Which resolution would you expect for this kind of motif? --MartinThoma 07:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Resolution too small, perspective problems, lonely branch at the top disturbing. --XRay 03:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 18:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)