Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 29 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Capsella bursa - pastoris I.JPG

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 07:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen,_Gewerbegebiet_-Linnertstraße-_--_2014_--_9988.jpg

[edit]

  •  Comment Do you ever made a photo from an shaky airplane with a speed of up to 200 km/h? IMO it's different to photos made on the ground with a tripod. 1/1.600 s is a long tíme under this conditions. Anyway, I withdraw this photo. --XRay 16:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --XRay 16:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen,_Kirchspiel,_Feld_in_Börnste_--_2016_--_0371.jpg

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews. --XRay 16:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:IC 2434 146 555-8 + IC2 Oldenburg Tweelbäker Weg.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Double-decker intercity train passing Oldenburg --Jacek79 16:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Noise level too high. probably the picture was too dark and you lightened it up during processing --Poco a poco 16:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

  •  Comment In fact, I didn't. And speed was only ISO 400, so I can't really explain the noise. --Jacek79 22:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
    Strange, can you then reduce it (see all darker areas)? Poco a poco 20:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)