Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 28 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Northern_Shoveler_-_two_males_VB_5.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Northern Shoveler - two males 5 --PumpkinSky 04:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Not really sharp. --Smial 10:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Strong oppose sorry, very unsharp and noisy -- Basile Morin 04:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Not close to QI quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 12:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Cessna 525B Citation CJ3 N111KJ.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cessna 525B Citation CJ3 landing -- Sixflashphoto 00:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The crop is not ideal. With a proper crop the picture will get too small I think. --Ermell 20:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
    Changes made -- Sixflashphoto 00:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The filename should be improved. --XRay 19:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Agreed and converted to a more direct name that was not just the tail number. -- Sixflashphoto 21:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. --XRay 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Sharp enough, but low resolution. --XRay 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough, good lighting -- Spurzem 21:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

* Strong oppose As Ermell and gray halo (see note). It is not QI clearly, sorry--Lmbuga (talk) 01:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

    • User:Lmbuga, Voting on photos in CR closes when there's been no voting for two days, which I why I closed this. You voted after the two days (48 hours) and after I closed it, so I am striking your vote. See rules "The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines." PumpkinSky 04:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

File:N443WN Southwest Airlines 1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Southwest 737-700 landing -- Sixflashphoto 00:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeNot sharp enough IMO --Ermell 20:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Changes made -- Sixflashphoto 01:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There are a dust spot repeated (see note). The quality is not excellent: It's not sharp enough; but it's 4,288 × 2,848 pixels and if it was 2 megapixels... Lmbuga (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
    • User:Lmbuga This was 4 days after the prior vote and should have been closed by someone, and promoted, but wasn't so I'm leaving this one as is. PumpkinSky 04:51, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   ----PumpkinSky 04:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)