Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 25 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Sculptures_of_Roman_theater_masks_in_Baths_of_Diocletian2.jpg

[edit]

File:Καλημεριάνοι 6733.JPG

[edit]

File:P-klyuev-lv-6184.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Leonid Klyuev, head of «Immers» company, in Pereslavl. --PereslavlFoto 14:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion I can't get the name badge in a readable state with simple tricks. –Be..anyone 23:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry, the portrait was not about the badge. --PereslavlFoto 23:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Thought about this image several days. I don't like the rather hard flash lighting although you used a bouncer. So this is not really a good portrait photo, but acceptable as a documentary QI. -- Smial 19:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Mattbuck 22:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. --Cayambe 09:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 22:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (050).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation: The new track 3 is laid and waits for the gravel. At the new platform 1/2 working. --Steindy 00:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose too small DoF, only the foreground is in focus --Christian Ferrer 08:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
    Christian Ferrer, how much do you want by using a 300 mm tele? The distance to the railway sleepers is 60 cm, so that you can work it out. and the platform has a length of 300 meters. Other votes please. --Steindy 01:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For me the DoF is okay using a 300 mm tele. Good quality. --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)}
  •  Support A 300 mm tele lens has a narrow DoF. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Chistian --Livioandronico2013 23:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is unclear what the picture really wants to depict. As an overview it has too low DOF, as an approach to highlight a detail it has way too much DOF and messy composition. -- Smial 08:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Have you read the image description? There is in short words what can be said about the picture. --Steindy 01:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  weak I can´t see a messy composition. I see - likt it is written in the file name and in the description - a situation of reconstructing a railwaystation. It is not a outstanding work, but good enough for QI.--Hubertl 23:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Right side isn't sharp at all. Mattbuck 22:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --C messier 23:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)