Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 24 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Pretzel 01-14.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination German pretzel --A.Savin 13:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose overexposed (burned out areas (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Those two areas are negligible for me --A.Savin 18:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I usually don't mind little burned out areas, but those are crossing the line. --GMLSX 04:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Burnt areas impair the object shape rendering, and I don’t like the bottom shadow too much either – being the same colour as the object itself, it’s hard to guess whether it’s part of it or just shadow. I’m quite sure you can do better. --Kreuzschnabel 09:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The shadow is perhaps a reflection from a glossy surface similar to this photo where I used glossy photo paper as background. But besides the burnt areas it is very irritating, that this "shadow" appears only at the bottom, not at the "eyes" of that pretzel. Looks like unsufficiant en:Free-form select. -- Smial 15:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 20:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Carnac_56_Kerléjean_Bateaux_amarrés.jpg

[edit]

File:Jan-Wellem-Reiterdenkmal, Marktplatz, Düsseldorf - 2313.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Market place in the Old City of Düsseldorf with a sculpture of Johann Wilhelm, Elector Palatine. --Anıl Öztaş 08:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tonto II. 09:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 11:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp. Raising the micro contrast doesn't help it. --GMLSX 04:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp. --Jebulon 20:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 20:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Preah_Khan,_Angkor,_Camboya,_2013-08-17,_DD_09.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Preah Khan, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 07:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline weak  Oppose due to blur at top and bottom. Mattbuck 23:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Camera shake or lens Issues (I hope, as I'd like to get an older used 5D for my self) --GMLSX 04:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, apparantly slight motion blur. -- Smial 14:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Maybe 1/80 is not enough --The Photographer 16:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 20:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)