Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 21 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Knöpfe_--_2018_--_0501.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Buttons --XRay 04:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is just the upside down of the other button photograph, posted the day before this. --RaboKarbakian 18:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
@RaboKarbakian: Please be more careful with your reviews. It isn't social media. The subject is the same but it is really easy to see that the images are different. For example the exposure time is different. --XRay 11:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support These are different photos with different times, exposures, etc. We have ample precedent for promoting different images of the same scene when time, settings, etc are different. PumpkinSky 19:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Basotxerri 17:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Viajaste 00:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Knöpfe_--_2018_--_0502.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Buttons --XRay 05:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Just the upside down version of one posted the day after this one.--RaboKarbakian 18:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't understand your review as said before. Even if it had been nominated twice, that alone wouldn't be a reason for a contra vote. Just ask and an error can be corrected. --XRay 11:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  • There are many ways to fraud an image. Also, I am pretty sure that my mom cannot upload this to her FB without my help. I promise to refuse to help her with that. (I think I edited exif data back in 2003....)--RaboKarbakian 15:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Do you mean I changed the EXIF data? I hope I have misunderstood this with my modest English skills. --XRay 15:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I am opposing it for all of the things I don't have time to check. They are great photographs. I will be defeated probably, but it is worth checking if this is: a tiled image, a POV rendering, a simple double flip of the other image, something I have yet to consider.--RaboKarbakian 22:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support These are different photos with different times, exposures, etc. We have ample precedent for promoting different images of the same scene when time, settings, etc are different. PumpkinSky 19:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Basotxerri 17:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Viajaste 00:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)