Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 19 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Fruit dryer at the meadow orchard «Am Kåte» on Gaisrückenstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fruit dryer at the meadow orchard «Am Kåte» on Gaisrückenstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Icicle at the fruit dryer at the meadow orchard «Am Kåte» on Gaisrückenstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaisrückenstraße Am Kåte in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) on a power pole in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snow geese (Anser caerulescens) at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Complex in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A black-necked stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) landing at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Complex in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 03:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very Good. --Rjcastillo 03:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunrise over east Muttukadu backwater, from Muttukadu bridge, Tamilnadu --Tagooty 02:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fisherman in sunrise, southeast backwaters from bridge, Muttukadu, Tamilnadu --Tagooty 02:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House crow (Corvus splendens) perched on rubble, Muttukadu backwaters, TN --Tagooty 02:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) wading past a house crow (Corvus splendens), Muttukadu backwaters west, Tamilnadu --Tagooty 02:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mekong bank, dwellings and running pirogue, seen from the bridge between Don Det and Don Khon, Si Phan Don, Laos at golden hour with blue sky - Eastern view --Basile Morin 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two male farmers driving a tractor towing a raft loaded with green rice sheaves to be planted in a paddy field in front of karst mountains surrounded by mist, in the countryside of Vang Vieng, Vientiane Province, Laos. --Basile Morin 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Contre-jour photograph of a fisherman pulling his fishing net swamped with light on his pirogue at sunset in Don Tao, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Contre-jour photograph of sunset with the Mekong banks seen from the bridge between Don Det and Don Khon, Si Phan Don, Laos, and the sun eclipsed by a long cloud. Western side view. High-dynamic-range imaging. --Basile Morin 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very Good --Rjcastillo 03:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloud Forest, Gardens by the Bay, Singapore, at night, seen from the sky observation deck of the Marina Bay Sands skycrapper. Long-exposure photography (15 s). --Basile Morin 02:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female common kestrel perched on a tree. --Alexis Lours 00:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Wimmer, goalkeeper coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Wimmer, goalkeeper coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Wimmer, goalkeeper coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stefan Arvay, conditioning coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stefan Arvay, conditioning coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Qasr al-Hayr al-Sharqi medieval fortress, 730 CE, Syria. --Argenberg 18:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --N. Johannes 21:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of Hama city centre, Syria. --Argenberg 18:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harbour of Port-Vendres, Roussillon, France. --Palauenc05 18:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument at Jardín Victoria, La Orotava --Mike Peel 14:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castillo de San Juan Bautista, Tenerife --Mike Peel 14:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Trinity Ellis (CAN) --Sandro Halank 14:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Jessica Tiebel (GER) --Sandro Halank 14:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Raluca Strămăturaru (ROU) --Sandro Halank 14:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Victoria Demchenko (RUS) --Sandro Halank 14:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Aileen Frisch (KOR) --Sandro Halank 14:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Redouter Béar in Port-Vendres, France. --Palauenc05 13:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 14:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sign of building A of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of building A of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Middle part of the south facade of building A of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view (360°) from the viewing floor of the Berlin Television Tower over Berlin --Milseburg 11:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, very nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 13:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint John the Baptist church in Cambounet-sur-le-Sor, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moulin de la Salette in Lautrec, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 10:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 11:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main altar of the parish church of Sëlva. --Moroder 10:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Petersburg. Russian Railway Museum. Diesel locomotive TE3-1001 --Alexxx1979 09:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Petersburg. Russian Railway Museum. Diesel locomotive DA20-09 --Alexxx1979 09:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red mullet (Mullus barbatus), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 09:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bluespotted cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 09:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gulou Commercial Pedestrian Street in Tianjin --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tianjin Jushilin, Tempel in the Nankai district in Tianjin, old city --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Children's clothing in a shop on Gulou East Street in Tianjin --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Headgear in a shop on Gulou East Street in Tianjin --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination M114 155 mm Howitzer in Museum of technique --Mike1979 Russia 08:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination ML-20 152 mm gun-howitzer in Museum of technique --Mike1979 Russia 08:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yakovlev Yak-38 (s-n 1010) in Museum of technique --Mike1979 Russia 08:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a FRog Snail, Korrigania fosteri --Llez 07:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) catches fish (1 of 5), Muttukadu Backwaters, TN --Tagooty 06:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) tosses fish (2 of 5), Muttukadu Backwaters, TN --Tagooty 06:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) swallows fish (3 of 5), Muttukadu Backwaters, TN --Tagooty 06:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) swallows fish (4 of 5), Muttukadu Backwaters, TN --Tagooty 06:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little egret (Egretta garzetta) finishes its meal of fresh fish (5 of 5), Muttukadu Backwaters, TN --Tagooty 06:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frozen water droplets and hoar frost on a branch in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hoar frost on a mustard plant in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old bridge over the Truyere river in Entraygues, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Entraygues-sur-Truyere, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint George church in Entraygues-sur-Truyere, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Entraygues-sur-Truyere, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St George chapel in Entraygues-sur-Truyere, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stadsbrug (Kampen) is a lifting bridge over the IJssel.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Stadsbrug (Kampen) is a lifting bridge over the IJssel.
-
- Nomination A female northern harrier (Circus hudsonius) in flight at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 04:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Café terrace at the Jilly-Beach of Seehotel Dr. Jilly on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common firecrest in a bush. --Alexis Lours 00:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
WB seems off. Comparing to ebird.org, the underside should be white. --Tagooty 04:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment The white balance is not off, the brow is white, the underside is cream, the pictures were also taken near sunset (can see it from the shadows and the EXIFs). --Alexis Lours 10:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thanks for the explanation. --Tagooty 03:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common firecrest in a bush. --Alexis Lours 00:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
WB seems off. Comparing to ebird.org, the underside should be white. --Tagooty 04:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment The white balance is not off, the brow is white, the underside is cream, the pictures were also taken near sunset (can see it from the shadows and the EXIFs). --Alexis Lours 10:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thanks for the explanation. --Tagooty 03:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Luisser, assistent coach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Luisser, assistent coach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Detail is low (see stubble on chin) for a static non-player. Disturbing blurred band across the bottom. --Tagooty 04:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment @Tagooty: The blurring thing was deliberately composed that way. But no matter, it wasn't understood that way. --Steindy 10:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Wimmer, goalkeeper coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-spotted octopus (Callistoctopus macropus), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 22:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial night view to Spinola bay and Portomaso tower --Nino Verde 20:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le village de Niouc vu depuis la route de Vercorin. --Espandero 19:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plano Piloto. By User:Fwsbsb2. --Mike Peel 18:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to the heroes of Iquique. Santiago. Chile --Rjcastillo 17:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Lescout, Tarn, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 13:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination T-34-76 model 1943 in Museum --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs a description. --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21SMT in Museum --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination M3A1 Stuart in Museum --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-19SV in Museum --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breaking waves in Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Done Corrected - Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breaking waves in Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Done - Corrected -- Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Assumption church in Algans, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The letter "W" assembled from ironing beads --Superbass 20:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saint Blaise church in Lugan, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 11:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination T-62 --Mike1979 Russia 06:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
CA in the trees should be removed. --Ermell 20:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
New version uploaded. --Mike1979 Russia 09:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Still some left. Sorry. --Ermell 22:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Could you show me where? (with Image-Annotator) --Mike1979 Russia 13:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Done. Only a few. --Ermell 16:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Another attempt --Mike1979 Russia 07:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schleuskuhle, Rendsburg --MB-one 17:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Please, check the perspective correction. --Tournasol7 10:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 07:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:ChristineManie2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Defender and captain of the Cameroon women's national football team (by Happiraphael) --Adoscam 09:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry! Not really sharp and massive CAs on the face, the arm an the shirt. --Steindy 23:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose for CAs, but you mean the arms. -- Ikan Kekek 12:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is IMO ok for such high resolution, but indeed there is lot of strong CAs --Jakubhal 14:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Pichavaram_Mangrove_Forest_in_2021.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pichavaram Mangrove Forest in 2021 --Satdeep Gill 14:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 19:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I can't distinguish anything in this darkness, but the little I see is either unsharp or out of focus --Basile Morin 03:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin --Sandro Halank 13:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Great photo, which I think looks extremely natural, both the colours and the lighting. If you can't see any details in the dark parts of the picture, you should urgently check the calibration of your screens. Details are visible everywhere, nothing is completely black. The sharpness and image noise are also absolutely acceptable, considering the high image resolution and the conditions when the picture was taken. --Smial 10:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support With Smial. --Augustgeyler 00:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. IMO f/4 is too wide for adequate DoF. The Sony A7R3 is capable of much higher ISO for better exposure with smaller aperture. --Tagooty 05:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Even if the camera is capable of doing this, it does not mean that you should, because the ISO setting chosen by the photographer is already quite high for a landscape shot. In order to achieve a significantly greater depth of field at the chosen focal length, the photographer would have had to stop down to f/8 or even f/11, which would have meant ISO2600 or ISO5200. With such a setting, there would have been nothing but mud left in the dark areas of the image, even with the acknowledged good Sony sensors. Any detail would have been lost. It's just a technically difficult shooting situation, and I think the photographer has found a very good compromise. --Smial 10:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Comment I disagree that this is a good compromise. The shutter speed could have been reduced without increasing ISO: from 1/250 + f/4 to 1/60 + f/8 or 1/30 + f/11. With a 105mm lens, 1/60 or 1/30 will freeze motion given the camera's IBIS. --Tagooty 15:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Was the photographer standing on solid ground or possibly on a swaying boat? And, no, all these anti-shake functions have their limits. The statements of the camera manufacturers promising an improvement of another aperture stop every two years are, to put it mildly, overly optimistic. There is another peculiarity: the old rule of thumb that an exposure time roughly equal to the reciprocal of the 35 mm focal length is sufficient for blur-free pictures has always been only adequate for low demands. In other words, for images under favorable conditions that are not enlarged too much. Even with high-resolution conventional film, it only applied to a limited extent; with the generation of 6-mpixel DSLRs, it was extremely borderline, and with current cameras with more than 16 mpixels (crop) or over 36 mpixels (FF), it has become completely obsolete. Or to put it the other way around: With the help of modern anti-shake functions, the only thing that can really be achieved today is that the old rule of thumb can still be considered suitable for high-resolution sensors. The promised three or four (do we already have something with five or six?) f-stops are window dressing. --Smial 11:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Comment My experience with anti-shake has been quite positive. See for eg this image (1/40 sec with a 500mm lens, hand held). I haven't done systematic tests, but have noticed very significant blurring when I accidentally turned VR off. I guess we may agree to disagree on this issue! :-) --Tagooty 03:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Was the photographer standing on solid ground or possibly on a swaying boat? And, no, all these anti-shake functions have their limits. The statements of the camera manufacturers promising an improvement of another aperture stop every two years are, to put it mildly, overly optimistic. There is another peculiarity: the old rule of thumb that an exposure time roughly equal to the reciprocal of the 35 mm focal length is sufficient for blur-free pictures has always been only adequate for low demands. In other words, for images under favorable conditions that are not enlarged too much. Even with high-resolution conventional film, it only applied to a limited extent; with the generation of 6-mpixel DSLRs, it was extremely borderline, and with current cameras with more than 16 mpixels (crop) or over 36 mpixels (FF), it has become completely obsolete. Or to put it the other way around: With the help of modern anti-shake functions, the only thing that can really be achieved today is that the old rule of thumb can still be considered suitable for high-resolution sensors. The promised three or four (do we already have something with five or six?) f-stops are window dressing. --Smial 11:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Comment I disagree that this is a good compromise. The shutter speed could have been reduced without increasing ISO: from 1/250 + f/4 to 1/60 + f/8 or 1/30 + f/11. With a 105mm lens, 1/60 or 1/30 will freeze motion given the camera's IBIS. --Tagooty 15:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Even if the camera is capable of doing this, it does not mean that you should, because the ISO setting chosen by the photographer is already quite high for a landscape shot. In order to achieve a significantly greater depth of field at the chosen focal length, the photographer would have had to stop down to f/8 or even f/11, which would have meant ISO2600 or ISO5200. With such a setting, there would have been nothing but mud left in the dark areas of the image, even with the acknowledged good Sony sensors. Any detail would have been lost. It's just a technically difficult shooting situation, and I think the photographer has found a very good compromise. --Smial 10:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
- Agree with Tagooty concerning the aperture, because 105mm is a relatively long focal length. Thus the blurred parts are exacerbated. I also don't think shooting black night desserves QI just because it's difficult to chase photons in full darkness. This image is currently underexposed, per COM:I. Not everything should be granted with the label, for the particular shooting conditions. Otherwise we could explain all the technical issues of every picture, like "I did not have that lens with me at the moment", or "no tripod, the boat was moving", etc. Only the result counts, and here it's black, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Needs better categorization, at the moment only the location, nothing about the motive. --Marsupium 19:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Dark, too low DOF and noise in dark areas. --Nino Verde (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Basile Morin 01:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)