Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 19 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Thermite rail welding. --Steindy 00:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station Neunkirchen railwaystation. – While a thermite pot burns, the profile of the other weld is already grinded. --Steindy 00:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support The Prodigy („I am the firestarter“) at work. --Johann Jaritz 03:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hobbiton mill and double-arched bridge. --Nonexyst 22:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Great composition, excellent photograph. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chevrolet Business Coupe of 1930, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 17:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 18:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of Hazel (Corylus avellana), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany. --Poco a poco 17:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Bit noisy background, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 19:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disocactus phyllanthoides, Botanic Garden, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 17:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port-Navalo dans le Golfe du Morbihan Morbihan France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp. --Bgag 17:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Donesharpening in the image. Please care to take another look? --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Belem en rade dans le Port de commerce de Kergroise à Lorient Morbihan France. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument of Efrem Eshba. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 16:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mini waterfalls. Çamoluk - Osmaniye, TR --Zeynel Cebeci 16:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, QI for me --Hubertl 16:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A kite-bug (Nemoptera sinuata). Osmaniye, TR --Zeynel Cebeci 16:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 16:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sonchus oleraceus (Common sowthistle) --Christian Ferrer 12:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eschscholzia californica 'Purple Gleam' --Ram-Man 12:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stylophorum diphyllum --Ram-Man 12:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bergshamra metro station. --ArildV 11:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Métro C - Lyon --Billy69150 11:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline overexposed, blown out. --Steindy 00:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Métro D de Lyon --Billy69150 11:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too much noise. Perspective correction needed. Sorry. --Joydeep 12:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moravian-Silesian Beskids in winter --Pudelek 11:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Billy69150 11:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion good quality.--ArildV 11:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Please crop the right side some pixels to avoid the small end of the branches. --Cccefalon 11:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Defensive walls in Ząbkowice Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 12:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Defensive walls in Ząbkowice Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gołębia Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 10:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 13:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dahlia 'Ed Black'. --Joydeep 09:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dahlia 'Sam Huston'. --Joydeep 09:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tea pavillion of the winery Bürklin-Wolf: Building scaffolding after the great fire on 4/11/2014 --F. Riedelio 08:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mallorca - Peak of Puig de Massanella from southeast --Imehling 07:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ. --Palauenc05 17:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mallorca - Puig Major from Massanella --Imehling 07:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tramway à Saint-Étienne --Billy69150 07:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mirror in the water.
Famberhorst 05:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Question Might it be, that it is rotated clockwise? --Cccefalon 05:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose too blurry --Rodrigo.Argenton 06:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment I can run, but the picture is not promoted.--Famberhorst 06:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Done New version.--Famberhorst 07:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Support Sharpness sufficient for QI --Cccefalon 10:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep 12:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Mirror in the water.
-
- Nomination Bike lane bridge in Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) to Joure.
Famberhorst 05:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. However, could you reduce more the magenta fringing top left? See note. --Cccefalon 05:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Done small correction.--Famberhorst 06:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Bike lane bridge in Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) to Joure.
-
- Nomination Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia: Wisma Persekutuan Tawau - Federal Offices and Services, including Immigration Office (Imigresen) --Cccefalon 05:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Telupid, Sabah, Malaysia: St. Martin's Catholic Church --Cccefalon 05:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Empress Elisabeth monument (Volksgarten) Fountain area --Hubertl 05:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View at the Looshaus, Vienna, Michaelerplatz. Lower part of the facade --Hubertl 05:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central statues of the dome of the Michaelertrakt of Hofburg Palace in Vienna --Hubertl 05:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Superb quality, commendable annotations. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The upper Fusine lake, Fusine di Valroma, Tarvisio, Friuli --Hubertl 05:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Awesome landscape photograph, stunning white clouds. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM insurance in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Some metadata to explain the pair available on File:Blaues pferd.jpg. –Be..anyone 04:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Thanks. I've appended the meta information.--XRay 12:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Woerth, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose overexposed, too many white areas have burned out --Christian Ferrer 06:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC) * Comment great day, perfect wheater, but where was your new, heavy tripod! Its Unsharp too! But this picture is repeatable! --Hubertl 06:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shepherd`s cabin on the Mussen alp at Strajach, Koetschach-Mauthen, Lesachtal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a perspective correction - the nice motif is pretty distorted yet. --Cccefalon 05:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC) * Done new version uploaded, perspective distortion is corrected (was massive!) --Hubertl 06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter accomodation of park benches, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI, nice idea! --Hubertl 05:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant Maria Loretto, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs perspective correction. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)* Done new version uploaded, perspective distortion is corrected --Hubertl 06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC) OK now. --Bgag 14:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge in Huntington Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Jakec 01:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Too bad that they lost their covered bridge. –Be..anyone 21:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Structure of 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide. --Medium69 01:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion One C-C connection is imperfect in full resolution. --Cccefalon 05:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Done ; corrected.--Medium69 12:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – On the right side a grader with GPS device in the preparation of the subgrade for the second track. --Steindy 00:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn CA. --Smial 18:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A ÖBB Railjet with ÖBB 1116.250 in police-style approaches the Neunkirchen railwaystation. – --Steindy 00:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 05:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A ÖBB Railjet with ÖBB 1116.250 in police-style approaches the Neunkirchen railwaystation. – --Steindy 00:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Good quality. --Hubertl 05:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose blown out sky and details --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC), You are completely right Christian, the brightness seems repairable - but produces artefacts then, not the black parts at the locomotive. My fault.--Hubertl 06:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – While working on the left-hand track, the operation is carried out on the right tracks. --Steindy 00:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn QI for me --Hubertl 05:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I disagree. Avoidable noise. --Smial 18:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The old railway embankment of the local railway Willendorf–Neunkirchen Lbf who crossed the southern railway line near Neunkirchen railwaystation. --Steindy 00:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose Sky have been overexposed, CAs --Christian Ferrer 05:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior of the Gniezno Cathedral, Gniezno, Poland --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Persicaria amphibia in National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân.
Famberhorst 16:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Persicaria amphibia in National Park De Alde Feanen. Location, It Wikelslân.
-
- Nomination Antiphonale Cisterciense, miniature of Archangel Michael, Abbey Bibliotheca of Rein abbey, Rein, Styria, Austria. --Dnalor 01 15:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Overprocessed, resulting in artefacts. Can perhaps get salvaged. --Cccefalon 17:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for your review! New, corrected version uploaded. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes better but not your best one. However, I appreciate the EV and think it can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 16:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camels and costumes, as part of Brisbane's annual Christmas pageant in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. --Bald white guy 10:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline This image was clearly downsampled. Ram-Man 18:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Grader with GPS device in the grading of the ground. --Steindy 00:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose overexposed sky --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. That's not a fair-weather photos, but photos in the rain and darkness falls. In such circumstances there is no place on QI. --Steindy 23:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cerro Alegre, Valparaíso, Chile --Poco a poco 21:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment The right side leans to the left. --Steindy 21:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 20:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
I do not believe. While it's better but still wrong. In addition, the downpipe seems to be bent. --Steindy 21:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
New version, now? Poco a poco 18:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 23:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Cerro Alegre, Valparaíso, Chile --Poco a poco 21:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 Market Square in Ziębice --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)* Comment The left upper corner is overexposed, but not outburned. Fixable. Then QI for me.--Hubertl 21:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Done--Jacek Halicki 10:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose sorry but not fixable IMO, and there is also gray pixelized areas in the blown out sky --Christian Ferrer 05:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kitchen Creek Falls. Jakec 01:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kitchen Creek Falls. Jakec 01:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Valmiera Castle ruins. Kruusamägi 22:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
There is a lens flare (see note) and the sky is a bit noisy Poco a poco 22:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Valmiera Castle ruins. Kruusamägi 22:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Plate in Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano --Livioandronico2013 20:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Portrait of Annia Aurelia Faustina --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: La Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption Cuzco --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sierra de María - Los Vélez Natural Park, Spain. Air Photo, West Side (2014) --Sebaso 09:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: City wall, Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Building in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Review The right is leaning in --Christian Ferrer 16:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 18:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC) The top of the building behind the tree is always leaning in a bit --Christian Ferrer 06:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance gate of Lieleg Schloessl, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:54, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
How about centering the gate? Right now the composition is a bit off, imo. --DXR 09:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Done Centered gate and composition, corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 13:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Thanks. Good quality. --DXR 17:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance gate of Lieleg Schloessl, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:54, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Krimulda manor, guardsman house. Kruusamägi 04:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 12:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sänna, Alaveski lake. Kruusamägi 04:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 12:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Lucius Verus portrayed as a arval brother --Livioandronico2013 21:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ram-Man 01:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Antoninus Pius portrayed as a arval brother --Livioandronico2013 21:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality. --C messier 14:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mummy, Basilika Waldsassen, Germany --Optimist4343 17:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose IMHO it's unsharp, sorry. --C messier 15:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park. Swampy reed land.
Famberhorst 16:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 14:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park. Swampy reed land.
-
- Nomination Trébeurden dans les Côtes-d'Armor Bretagne --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose IMHO, the dark foreground is disturbing. --C messier 14:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination yes! I think so--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:20140707 Radkersburg - ceramic liquor barrel used in marching bands (Gombocz collection) - H4209.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Household item (Gombocz Collection), Radkersburg --Hubertl 15:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 16:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Unsufficiant description: "Miscellaneous" --Smial 18:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Done I agree, it was really not sufficient. Wheather the file name, nor the description. But fixed now!--Hubertl 09:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted Issues were fixed. No objections. Treating this as a normal promote and closing quickly. Ram-Man 12:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Άγιος Δημήτριος Αυλωνάρι 5564.JPG
[edit]- Nomination The byzantine church of Saint Demetrius at Avlonari, central Euboea, Greece. --C messier 16:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
OpposeSorry but I desagree,the lower part of the picture is totally blurred. Need a crop.--Livioandronico2013 21:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)- Support The church is the main object and this is okay. Good quality. --Steindy 22:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support as others. --Hubertl 23:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Motion blur. -- Smial 08:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)- Done cropped the blurry path. --C messier 11:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me now.--Livioandronico2013 12:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Now the composition is out of balance, but I will not be nitpicking, so Neutral -- Smial 19:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --C messier 18:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Mercedes Citaro G n°961 Villejean Université.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Autobus articulé à Rennes brève --Billy69150 13:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status --Christian Ferrer 19:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The author is a Wikimedian. --Kvardek du 09:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The coach itself is only slightly overexposed but a blown sky is a no-go on QI. --Kreuzschnabel 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --C messier 18:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Hammarby_sjöstad_2013_06.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Buildings in the residential area in Hammarby sjöstad, Stockholm (2013). --Jopparn 18:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Please check your image. It needs perspective correction.--XRay 10:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Fixed! Thank you for pointing it out. Jopparn 23:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Sorry. Better, but IMO still not fixed.--XRay 09:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Hi again! I tried one last time now :-). Jopparn 09:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment IMO still not fixed. Please look at the building at the right and at the left. They should be vertical. May be another review would be helpful.--XRay 17:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC) - Question Jopparn, do you have a technical problem to solve this problem? Gimp has a special tool to fix it!--Hubertl 12:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I made the correction. its QI now for me. --Hubertl 13:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- When changing the perspective I looked at the rainwater pipe on the building in the middle (and that was perfectly straight in the last version I uploaded). The technical part with Gimp is not an issue, but I must admit that I am unsure what part to focus on when adjusting the perspective. Best, Jopparn 00:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- In this case, the optical problem was primarily on the right side. You tilted the picture, there were some white edges, I did it with the PS transformation tool. --Hubertl 01:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- When changing the perspective I looked at the rainwater pipe on the building in the middle (and that was perfectly straight in the last version I uploaded). The technical part with Gimp is not an issue, but I must admit that I am unsure what part to focus on when adjusting the perspective. Best, Jopparn 00:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --C messier 18:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Gamo_persa_(Dama_mesopotamica),_Tierpark_Hellabrunn,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2012-06-17,_DD_01.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Persian fallow deer (Dama mesopotamica), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very special. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose I would like to discuss this. It looks overprocessed, especially the background, and there are some CAs. --Uoaei1 17:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
New version uploaded Poco a poco 19:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC) - Support Big improvement for the trunk. –Be..anyone 03:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:140819_Schwedter_Steg_sw.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bridge "Schwedter Steg" in Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg. --Code 06:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment It doesn't feel quite level to me. Mattbuck 17:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Lighting, exposure, and focus and DOF are good. While I perceive a tilt, I think it is an illusion caused by the shadows. The post at the end of the bridge is vertical. I think putting the camera very near the centerline of the bridge is an unfortunate choice. Since the subject is symmetric, our attention is drawn to the asymmetric elements, the shadows and the background. These detract from the subject. Also, most of the information about the subject that is conveyed by the left half of the frame is duplicated by the right. --Wsiegmund 16:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Question @Wsiegmund: Thank you very much for the review. It's not that I wouldn't accept your decline but I set this on discussion because after having read your review I don't really understand your decision. Could you eventually summarize which quality problem you see with this picture? Is it the composition? Thank you in advance. --Code 09:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment My primary concern is the composition of the image. "The arrangement of the elements within the image should support depiction of the subject, not distract from it." Please see COM:I. That is the essence of my earlier comments. I'm sorry I was unclear. This was a difficult review for me because many aspects of the image are good. I would welcome the thoughts of others. --Wsiegmund 16:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much, now I understand. Yes, this is certainly not an easy picture. --Code 16:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment My primary concern is the composition of the image. "The arrangement of the elements within the image should support depiction of the subject, not distract from it." Please see COM:I. That is the essence of my earlier comments. I'm sorry I was unclear. This was a difficult review for me because many aspects of the image are good. I would welcome the thoughts of others. --Wsiegmund 16:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support After I've supported the colored version, I would not support this photo because I like the color version better. Nevertheless me the photo is too good to be deselected. After otherwise find no raters, therefore I consent. I like this view and it's good quality for me. --Steindy 15:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the review, Steindy. I thought this picture would work better in black/white. Gerade die Schatten und Strukturen finde ich schwarzweiß eigentlich spannender, als in Farbe. Aber da kann man natürlich unterschiedlicher Auffassung sein. Deshalb wollte ich beides ausprobieren. --Code 22:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Are two versions of the same photo eligible for QI status? Well in this case, the B&W image is enough of a different picture for me. It's also the superior of the two. Ram-Man 17:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)