Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 18 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination «Hausboot», Hotel Astoria`s beach cafe, Johannes-Brahms-Promenade #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach bar on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade at My Lake`s residence, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western bay on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jilly boathouse and Parkhotel on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Triton's trumpet (Charonia tritonis), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 22:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pufferfish (Torquigener flavimaculosus), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 22:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golden anemone (Condylactis aurantiaca), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 22:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) perched on twigs. --Alexis Lours 21:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) perched on twigs. --Alexis Lours 21:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) perched on twigs. --Alexis Lours 21:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) perched on twigs. --Alexis Lours 21:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) perched on twigs. --Alexis Lours 21:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to Spinola bay, St. Julian, Malta --Nino Verde 20:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female northern pintail (Anas acuta) in flight at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 20:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le château de Beauregard vu depuis la route de Vercorin. --Espandero 19:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Faro de Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 19:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Image is rotated to the left. Also verticals are not straight. From my point of view the verticals can't be corrected without tower deformations. --Nino Verde 21:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Missioneira Cross and the Ruins of São Miguel das Missões. By User:Vini Ara. --Mike Peel 18:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overprocesed. Halos on cross and building. Grass is destroyed. --Nino Verde 21:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Our Lady of Mount Carmel (Balluta parish church) --Nino Verde 17:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Our Lady of Mount Carmel (Balluta parish church) --Nino Verde 17:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very Good. --Rjcastillo 18:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deutscher Fernsehpreis 2018 - Kida Khodr Ramadan and Marvin KrenIch --Superbass 17:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Per se good image, but the text on the left looks not clear (like an AI correction gone wrong). Can you fix that? :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry! If both people are looking at another photographer, it can't be a QI. --Steindy 18:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corridor leading to Alfons Goppel square from the Hof university. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Prburley 17:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South view of building A of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Intersection in Eschweiler, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 17:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wicklow Way at Wicklow Gap --Superbass 17:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corridor leading to the café of the Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main Entrance Paris Store. Santiago, Chile --Rjcastillo 16:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Connection building between building B and C of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of building C of Hof university in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ammophila arenaria --Christian Ferrer 15:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady church in Blan, Tarn, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 13:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 14:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paris 4e Hôtel Lambert (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 13:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Paris 4e Hôtel Lambert (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 13:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Suzdal. Saint Nicholas Church --Alexxx1979 09:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Suzdal. Kamenka River --Alexxx1979 09:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Deûle river from the Edmond Ory footbridge, in Lambersart, France --Velvet 08:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main altar of the parish church of Sëlva. --Moroder 08:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the parish church of Sëlva. --Moroder 08:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rib vault in the church of Sëlva. --Moroder 08:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nizhniy Novgorod on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 08:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Mihaela-Carmen Manolescu (ROU) --Sandro Halank 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Lin Sin-Rong (TPE) --Sandro Halank 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Daria Obratov (NED) --Sandro Halank 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Dania Obratov (NED) --Sandro Halank 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women's race at the Nations Cup at Altenberg Luge World Cup 2018/19: Danielle Louise Scott (GBR) --Sandro Halank 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat, Church of San Giorgio Maggiore and Basilica del Redentore. Venice --Ввласенко 07:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Dull sky, but good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Bach, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 07:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tour des Templiers in Martiel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Mary Magdalene church in Marroule, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saints Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 07:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 17:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Leonard church in Escamps, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 07:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right valve of a Rayed Trough Shell, Mactra stultorum var. cinerea --Llez 06:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Half of an impaled chestnut found on a forest trail. Focus stack of 41 photos.
--Famberhorst 06:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Amazing! Pretty sure-fire FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
*Thank you for your comment.--Famberhorst 16:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Half of an impaled chestnut found on a forest trail. Focus stack of 41 photos.
-
- Nomination Ice crystals on blackberry leaves in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heubach and solitary tree in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solitary tree in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leaves and moss with hoar frost in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hattem, facade stone of Stellingmolen De Hoop, built in 1806. Destroyed by fire in 1897.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, facade stone of Stellingmolen De Hoop, built in 1806. Destroyed by fire in 1897.
-
- Nomination Café terrace at the Jilly-Beach of Seehotel Dr. Jilly on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mute swans at the Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snowman face at the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support :-) --Basile Morin 06:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ship landing stage on Landspitz of the peninsula, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salix sepulcralis at the peninsula promenade on east bay, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Written wall in the National Historical Museum. Santiago. Chile --Rjcastillo 01:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werner Gregoritsch, headcoach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werner Gregoritsch, headcoach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werner Gregoritsch, headcoach of Austria U21, --Steindy 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Burnt out right side of face. --Nino Verde 21:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower, buds and leaves of Solandra maxima (Hawaiian lily) -- Alvesgaspar 19:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Cuq-Toulza, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady church in Pechaudier, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Garrevaques, Tarn, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 16:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remakri Canal, Thanchi, Bandorban. --RockyMasum 12:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice landscape, ok quality imo. --ArildV 11:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view to old city buildings from venetian fortress, Kerkyra, Corfu, Greece --Nino Verde 07:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Voulismeni with restaurants, shops and hotels near it at sunrise. Agios Nikolaos, Crete, Greece --Nino Verde 07:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Good quality and colours. Small CCW tilt. --Tagooty 08:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Done Fixed. --Nino Verde 08:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harbour of Mèze --Christian Ferrer 15:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phuket Laguna Golf club field. --Nino Verde 07:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phuket Laguna Golf club field. --Nino Verde 07:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lukkarinsanta and Isojoenranta districts of Pori. --Kallerna 08:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Burned out whites, left lower corner is unsharp --Nino Verde 08:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Philipp Lienhart, player of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Men's race at the FIL World Luge Championships 2019 in Winterberg: Inārs Kivlenieks (LAT) --Sandro Halank 01:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jodrell Bank Mark II telescope. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Purple CA. Trees have jpeg artifacts, over-processed? --Tagooty 16:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
@Tagooty: Looking in more detail, I definitely over-processed this. It was a HDR image, but I've just gone back to the source and reprocessed using the best of the three photos, it should look better now with the processing and CA. Unfortunately I took the photo with JPG not RAW, so I can't improve on the artifacts though. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Markedly better. There is a fair bit of purple CA along the edges of the dish and the top of the collector. A red-link Category to be corrected. --Tagooty 16:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
@Tagooty: I had another go at the CA, this time using manual controls, and I've uploaded a new version - I can't do much better than that without introducing red artifacts at the bottom though. I've also fixed the redlink category. I think this has gone as far as it can with this photo (but I'm happy to share the original file if you want to have a go!), so suggest either accepting/rejecting as appropriate now. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thank you. --Tagooty 04:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Jodrell Bank Mark II telescope. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The lighthouse of Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal, at sunset -- Alvesgaspar 12:31, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unsharp, chromatic abberations --Nino Verde 08:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caterpillar 330 excavator on a pile of dirt Matthew T Rader 18550, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Already promoted on Jan 9th --MB-one 14:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination _Caterpillar_950k_Wheel_Loader_Matthew_T_Rader_18:55,_5_January_2022_(UTC)_
- Promotion Comment Slight perspective correction needed (cf the lamp posts), vignetting, and you should identify/categorize the bulldozer as much as possible since it's the subject (at the very least brand which is clearly visible, ideally a model). --Trougnouf 19:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
I fixed the lens distortion and straightening and I updated the description to be more specific. --Matthew T Rader 20:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Support Well done, thank you! --Trougnouf 22:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monarch fern sorus which is a group of sporangium, containing spores inside --Vitaium 13:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Most part of image is out of focus. --Nino Verde 06:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Mohnblüten_Trio_(47937350642).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Poppy flowers in Germany --Nguyenhai314 09:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not from a commoner. The uploader / nominator is almost certainly not the author. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days No discussion needed; image is ineligible per the Guidelines.--Peulle 11:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Mohnblüten_(51226608286).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Poppy flowers in Germany --Nguyenhai314 09:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not from a commoner AFAIK. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days No discussion; image is ineligible per the Guidelines.--Peulle 11:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Sonnenblume_(21695152852).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Sunflower in full bloom --Nguyenhai314 09:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not from a commoner AFAIK. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days No discussion; image is ineligible per the Guidelines.--Peulle 11:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Gladiolen_(19977567615).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A gladiolus in full bloom --Nguyenhai314 15:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- I withdraw my support Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Jelican9 19:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not from a commoner AFAIK. The uploader (nominator) is not likely to be the author. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose--Peulle 11:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined Direct decline; image is ineligible per the Guidelines.--Peulle 11:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Gladiolen_(19790391188).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A gladiolus in full bloom --Nguyenhai314 15:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- I withdraw my support Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not likely to be from a commoner. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Sonnenblume_(20634446749).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sunflower in full bloom --Nguyenhai314 15:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- I withdraw my support Good quality. --Nino Verde 16:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not likely to be from a commoner. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Oops, i've missed this. Thanks for your observation! --Nino Verde (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 10:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Sonnenblumen_(19776912555).jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Sunflower in different views --Nguyenhai314 15:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
* Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I did not notice that.--Ermell 10:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not likely to be from a commoner. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined Direct decline; image is ineligible per the Guidelines.--Peulle 11:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Bodrum_Castle_(2017).jpg
[edit]- Nomination View on Bodrum Castle in Turkey. --Serhio Magpie 16:05, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Mahtamsv 21:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
OpposeTilt and chromatic aberration should be corrected. @Mahtamsv: I don't think that you should start your contribution on Commons with QI review straightaway. --A.Savin 07:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Serhio Magpie 01:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 14:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Moroder 12:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz 08:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek 12:49, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 12:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Anjuna,_Goa,_India,_Holy_Hindu_cows.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cows at Anjuna Beach, Goa, India. --Argenberg 19:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
CommentOppose shadows are a bit too dark.Hopefully fixable.Not done--MB-one 21:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)--MB-one 14:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)- Oppose Not done. --A.Savin 21:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Lifting shadows would only make the scene worse. I believe everything is OK with this image. Natural light at sunset/early golden hour with shadows balanced for that type of light and that moment. Also note the cow itself is half black which adds to the impression and creates an illusion of dark shadows. I believe everything is OK with this image. Let the community decide. --Argenberg 22:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Seems OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support For me, too. --Stepro 06:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The front cow's face would benefit from suggested shadow raising. Alternatively raising the local contrast for that area might help as well. As it is now, the texture of this main object in the foreground is hardly visible. --Augustgeyler 11:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 11:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Shanghai_Markt_Fisch_Auslagen-20150516-RM-115200.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Displays at a Shanghai streeet market in the Jing'an District --Ermell 08:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Please fix the category "Street markets in Shanghai" first. --A.Savin 13:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)- Done Same as above. --Ermell 22:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 10:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Finkenstein_am_Faaker_See_Faak_am-See_Kohlstattstraße_Info-Tafel_15042021_0801.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Information board on Kohlstattstraße in Faak am See, Finkenstein am Faaker See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. (White could be improved.) --XRay 04:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Appears to be a copyvio, nominated for deletion. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. Argue your point about Austrian copyright law, if you're familiar with it, elsewhere. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, subject to copyright. --Tagooty 00:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is what you guys consider as "quality image", a badly cropped image of a information board? --Kallerna 06:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Technically it fits requirements of Quality images. --Nino Verde (talk) 06:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not promote images for QI as long as they are nominated for deletion. --Augustgeyler 22:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Nonsense, in my opinion. When the nomination for deletion is rejected, it's fair that it didn't become a QI just because someone nominated it for deletion? Anything can be nominated for deletion, no matter how frivolous or ignorant the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 12:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment And anyone who's image got nominated for deletion could wait with nominating this for QI as long as this deletion request is rejected. --Augustgeyler 20:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Question The deletion request happened after the QIC nomination. Why should the nominator withdraw, when the deletion request is seemingly likely to fail? -- Ikan Kekek 03:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment You are right. I did not see that. If it was about my nomination I would than withdraw it, to sort this out first.--Augustgeyler 00:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO the photo has an educational character. --F. Riedelio 18:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 11:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
=
[edit]- Nomination: Information board on Kohlstattstraße in Faak am See, Finkenstein am Faaker See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. (White could be improved.) --XRay 04:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Appears to be a copyvio, nominated for deletion. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:12, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality (subject to copyright issue) --Tagooty 00:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is what you guys consider as "quality image", a photo of a information board? --Kallerna 06:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not promote images for QI as long as they are nominated for deletion. --Augustgeyler 22:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO the photo has an educational character. --F. Riedelio 18:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 11:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Finkenstein_am_Faaker_See_Faak_am_See_Inselweg_Info-Tafel_15042021_0809.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Information board on Inselweg in Faak am See, Finkenstein am Faaker See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Appears to be a copyvio, nominated for deletion. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. (Subject to copyright issue) --Tagooty 05:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This is what you guys consider as "quality image", a photo of a information board? --Kallerna 06:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think we're supposed to judge what a worthwhile subject is. After all, Wikipedia uses all kinds of ordinary images to illustrate subjects of encyclopedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Commons has many CATs "Info boards in ...". The CAT:"Information boards in Carinthia", to which this image belongs, has 253 images out of which 17 are promoted as QI. --Tagooty 03:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- That is sad. Commons may need all kind of photos, but how about QI? --Kallerna 04:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- So a quality photo of an informational subject should be declined because the subject bores you? -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The reason is not that is bores me, the reason is that this is a photo of a photo. Maybe we should print this photo and take a picture of that one? --Kallerna 10:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- So what that it's a photo of a photo? That's hardly unique, and I don't understand why that could be construed as a valid reason why this is not a quality image. -- Ikan Kekek 13:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not promote images for QI as long as they are nominated for deletion. --Augustgeyler 22:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO the photo has an educational character. --F. Riedelio 18:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 11:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)