Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 15 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Church of the Immaculate Conception, Filandia, Colombia --Bgag 04:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calle del Convento, Filandia, Colombia --Bgag 04:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Primax Petrol Station, Vereda Mandiva, Colombia --Bgag 04:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zeuss Petrol Station, Pueblo Tapado, Colombia --Bgag 04:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain on Marktplatz #1, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain on Marktplatz #1, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Municipal office on Marktplatz #4, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the parish church Saint Leonard, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West wall with portal of the parish church Saint Leonard, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A pair of lion sculptures in the Castle of Brescia. --Moroder 01:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus) in Kittilä, Finland. By User:Estormiz --Jastrow 19:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion This is a very well structured photo. -- Liberaler Humanist 20:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of Almodóvar del Río and the Castle of Almodóvar del Río. --Kallerna 14:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lissabon, Parque Eduardo VII, Pavilhão Carlos Lopes --Berthold Werner 14:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Désert Blanc in Roussillon (Luberon), France, now CAs removed. --Tesla Delacroix 09:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Very nice (IMHO aesthetically the best of the three). It would be even better if you could avoid sharpening the sky which just increases the noise (see note on the 3rd image). No offence, I just want to help to make good images better. --Aristeas 09:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 14:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Désert Blanc in Roussillon (Luberon), France, now CAs removed. --Tesla Delacroix 09:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Désert Blanc in Roussillon (Luberon), France, CAs removed and sharpened --Tesla Delacroix 09:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
A nice one. As I see you have applied some sharpening which improved the foreground, i.e. the in-focus area. However the sky is a bit nosiy now. Best solution would be to apply the sharpening only to the in-focus areas (roughly, the foreground) and not to the sky. You can do this in Lightroom. --Aristeas 09:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Support Thank you! --Aristeas 14:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spear thistle (Cirsium vulgare) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 1 Place de Clairefontaine in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. --Tournasol7 07:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Erfurter Straße 50 in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Anne church in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bergfried of Wartburg Castle in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jana Pawla II Place in Wiecbork, Kuyavian-Pomeranian, Poland. --Tournasol7 07:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Galapagos brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Island, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunately unsharp wings. Otherwise very good image, but that point spoils it for me, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 13:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Straw piles near Sillustani, Peru --Poco a poco 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus), Chobe National Park, Botsuana --Poco a poco 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 13:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, would recommend separation of the sky-white and the snow-white. :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Pierre church of Villerot (Saint-Ghislain, Belgium) --Trougnouf 07:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz Sprinter (2006). By User:K.szadkowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fiat Ducato (2014) ambulance. By User:K.szadkowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Caddy ambulance. By User:K.szadkowski --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 12:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eclectic houses, Boulevard Jean-Baptiste Lebas, 20,22, Lille, France --Velvet 07:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Traces of CAs at the branches (but not irritating) and IMHO a bit too rigid sharpening, but that’s a matter of taste. --Aristeas 09:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vivian Beaumont Theater at Lincoln Center --Ermell 07:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hood with ventilation grille and lettering of a Porsche 911 --Ermell 07:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat --Ermell 07:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Botenlauben castle ruins in Bad Kissingen --Ermell 07:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sevogelbrunnen in Basel --Ermell 07:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Giulio Bezzi of Italy --Granada 06:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New leaves of Cyclamen hederifolium between fallen autumn leaves. Focus stack of 12 photos.
--Famberhorst 06:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination New leaves of Cyclamen hederifolium between fallen autumn leaves. Focus stack of 12 photos.
-
- Nomination Pillar with romanesque reliefs at Seckau Basilica, Styria, Austria --Uoaei1 05:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ankogel in the High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 05:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laschgbach brook in the Tauern Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 05:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. American Herkules windmill in Petgatten de Feanhoop. Year of construction 1926 (Detail).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. American Herkules windmill in Petgatten de Feanhoop. Year of construction 1926 (Detail).
-
- Nomination Balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) buds --The Cosmonaut 01:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portugal, Mosteiro da Batalha, Estátua Equestre de D. Nuno Álvares Pereira --Berthold Werner 18:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of the Holy Trinity in Horní Rybníky, Czechia --MIGORMCZ 10:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion It needs a perspective correction, please think about the verticals --Michielverbeek 10:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Done @Michielverbeek: I did perspective correction. --MIGORMCZ 10:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Mark in the altarpiece of the Saint-Sauveur church in Ham-en-Artois, Pas-de-Calais, France,--Pierre André Leclercq 16:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Sorry Pierre, the sharpness is just not there, otherwise all good done --Poco a poco 18:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I agree, IMO difficult to repare. Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 11:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Btw my comment refers to all 5 noms of statues, there is an issue also with the aspect ratio, they look stretched out in the horizontal axle Poco a poco 19:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Machu Picchu, Peru --Poco a poco 07:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Debashritaiitmandi 05:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Riddarhuset, Stockholm, seen from Riddarholmsbron. --Liberaler Humanist 15:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kornhamnstorg and Munkbroleden, Stockholm, seen from Mälarrampen --Liberaler Humanist 15:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Immature herring gull at Bush Terminal Park --Rhododendrites 22:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mockingbird in Green-Wood Cemetery --Rhododendrites 22:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de la Muette, rue André-Pascal, Paris 16e (by Polymagou) --Sebring12Hrs 17:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seehof-Parksicht (by Reinhard Kirchner) --Sebring12Hrs 17:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support OK. IMHO a borderline case – too much contrast, harsh sharpening. But in 2007 the dynamic range of most sensors was rather low, so it was not possible to record both highlights and shadows in such a photo in best quality; and the harsh sharpening was often considered good. Therefore IMHO still OK. --Aristeas 10:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosaic of Neptune, ancient roman city of Itálica, Santiponce, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 08:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Crop, sorry --Moroder 01:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum of the church of San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 08:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Albeta, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 11:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Regional Nature Reserve in Mont de Couple, Pas-de-Calais France.--Pierre André Leclercq 22:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Level of detail too low for me, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 14:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advices.--Pierre André Leclercq 11:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ratsada St, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 11:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Comment Squeezed aspect ratio --Moroder 01:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Done --Poco a poco 08:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 11:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Ratsada St, Phuket, Thailand --Poco a poco 11:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Comment Squeezed aspect ratio --Moroder 01:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Snowbirds flyover --Angry Red Hammer Guy 01:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Wasn't this photo nominated in the past? --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Comment Yes, this photo was nominated in the past. It had still not been reviewed, so I nominated it again and deleted the old nomination. Was this bad practice? --Angry Red Hammer Guy 19:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Comment Don't be angry ;-) but I guess so. You are not supposed to delete nominations but in case you can whithdraw them with the template {{Withdrawn}} --Moroder 10:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Dalai Hills-2, Mussoorie,India --Navneetsharmaiit 13:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Comment There is at least one dust spot and some more dark spots and noise in the sky --Moroder 04:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Not done --Moroder 11:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Trenčín_Castle_14.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Castle Watch Tower Over Trenčín and Beyond --Scotch Mist 07:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Moroder 05:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject underexposed due direction of the sun. Halo effect, unsharp, noisy, CA. --Kallerna 22:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Kallerna: You make some valid technical points but photography is about more than simply creating images of objects under ideal lighting conditions. The 'Watch Tower' itself is relatively featureless apart from the finial but the stairway and wooden 'wall cladding' are relevant to this particular tower which in dark silhouette emphasizes the view below and the bright sky beyond which in turm emphasize the 'look-out role' of a 'Watch Tower'. (Although IMHO the CA's seem minor in the overall context of this image I can address these when time allows but would appreciate the views of others in the meantime?) --Scotch Mist 06:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Of course it is, but I'm just evaluating the result. The overall technical quality is IMO just not enough to feature this one. --Kallerna 07:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'm sorry @Kallerna: , but you are using the term underexposed in a wrong way. Specially stating that it is a technical issue. A dark part does not mean that it is underexposed, if you can see all the detail. It is simply dark because it is in the shadow as in reality. Therefore it is correctly exposed. More, most photos have an ample spectrum of lights, like a white sky in an overcast day, and it is not overexposed, or some black parts. That is the beauty of a composition, having an ample dynamic range of lights and you are opposing many of those beautiful images. That's to bad! --Moroder 09:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well exposed photo of midnight darkness might be technically ok, but it is still only darkness. If you point your camera to direct backlight the result is abysmal, sorry. If you support every badly executed photo to be a QI, every snapshot could be QI, there is no point in promoting images. That's bad also! --Kallerna 00:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Kallerna: In between 'Featured Pictures' and casual snapshots there are many good quality photos that may or not be rated QI on the basis of personal style and taste - often more creative photographers will push technical boundaries further but at the same time provoke more interest through, for example, different 'perspectives', less obvious compositions, or more striking contrasts, etc - it is of course up to each individual how they rate images for QI but personally, as long as the minimum criteria are met, I would rather see imaginative photos pushing technical boundaries and perhaps attempting to exploit varying light conditions rather than technically perfect but relatively simple/straightforward photos that reveal no individual traits. That said, all contributions should always be welcomed as the greater the range of images the more contributions that are in turn likely to be encouraged from others! --Scotch Mist 09:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Moroder, very well argued. Arguably a somewhat small photo, but I see the details. -- Ikan Kekek 06:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
* Oppose The brightness of the roof should be better to manage. Please spend more light there. --Milseburg 18:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done @Milseburg: Lightened roof --Scotch Mist 08:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It's still pretty dark. I think this image would normally be fixable in development but it was captured with the wrong settings (1/500s for a static subject -> ISO400 instead of base ISO) so the camera's dynamic range was wasted and there doesn't seem to be enough detail to recover in the dark areas. --Trougnouf 16:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Trougnouf: Or, perhaps as suggested by Moroder and apparently evidenced by numerous photos of others, the roof of the 'Watch Tower' is actually "dark" and with little colour/detail because the tiles have been weathered over a long period of time? --SM1 (talk) 08:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment perhaps, but the front is very dark too, and regardless there is little detail and too much noise as the exposure value is increased in software. --Trougnouf 09:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good enogh for me now. Cameras do not automatically reproduce brightness in an authentic manner. Sometimes you have to correct. --Milseburg (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted ----A.Savin 22:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)