Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 15 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

==

[edit]
  • Nomination Eching Beching, Rural Games of Bangladesh. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Masum-al-hasan 05:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perhaps others may think differently but this seems too motion-blurred to me, not a QI for me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Let's discuss this. I find it a good action shot. -- Ikan Kekek 19:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Motion blur in itself may not be that bad, but I don't find the image sharp enough in any case.--Peulle 07:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, not sharp enough --Sandro Halank 18:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Sandro Halank 18:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Alone_in_the_blue.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saintmartin Island. By User:Khalid6736 --Masum-al-hasan 18:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Masses of dust spots need to be removed. The photo looks oversaturated and the categorisation is confusing as well as the romantic title.--Ermell 07:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Despite odd file name it is a very high quality and visaully pleasing image --EoRdE6 04:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Oversaturated and dust spots, as Ermell said. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Withdrawing any support because reviewing this image on a different screen (this time a 1440p AMOLED) displays all the dust spots that were somehow missed on my laptop display... Some benefits to smartphones :) --EoRdE6
  •  Oppose Oversaturization, dust spots, chromatic aberration on the boat, overprocessed, no meaningful file name: not a QI.--Peulle 07:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Lerum_syltetøyfabrikk_i_Sogndal,_2017.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lerum jam factory Sogndal. --Bep 14:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Excellent photo. It's not the kind of thing you expect to see in a foggy water and mountain scene. I think it could be a good FP candidate. -- Ikan Kekek 16:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Appreciate this is a nice photo, but is the file size of 1.53 MB not below the minimum acceptable for QI of 2MB or am I missing something here? --Scotch Mist 16:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
    •  Support Hi Scotch Mist, I know your intention is a good one but the limit is 2 MP (Megapixels), not 2 MB (Megabytes). This one has 24 MP. --Basotxerri 16:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment @ Bep: could you correct the perspective, please, the image is leaning in on the right handside. --Basotxerri 16:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment Thank you for your previous clarification and my further education - have withdrawn my previous 'opposition' but agree a perspective adjustment on the right would be desirable! --Scotch Mist 17:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As mentioned before, opposing until correction. Rest per Ikan Kekek. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
      • I have fixed the perspective. Thanks for the heads-up, I did not notice. --Bep 18:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Hi Ikan Kekek, hi Bep, it's OK on the left but if you look to the right image border it still isn't straight and leaning in. I think this can be fixed although these combinations of inclination and vertical distortion sometimes are tricky to correct. However it seems that it's already good enough for the others. Bep, would you like to try it again? --Basotxerri 16:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I have taken it for another spin in Lightroom, and now both ends line up to the grid. --Bep 18:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Scotch Mist 06:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit foggy, but that's the weather. Looks OK.--Peulle 07:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support good enough --Sandro Halank 18:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Sandro Halank 18:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Tanguar_Haor_টাঙ্গুয়ার_হাওড়.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tanguar Haor, Sunamganj. By User:Laz Mahmud --Masum-al-hasan 13:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Great shot. --Kritzolina 14:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, it's an unbalanced composition: far too much sky, a bit more of foreground would have been better, too. --Basotxerri 16:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Quite heavy posterization.--Peulle 07:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Peulle. Low quality due to much too strong jpg compression setting. I would love to see this image re-uploaded with best jpg quality settings, because it is, as for kritzolina, a really nice shot and good composition. --Smial 00:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 16:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)