Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 13 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Quail in hands, Canberra ACT.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Japanese quail in hands, ACT -- Thennicke 05:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm not going to vote against a promotion right now, but I think this photo is worth a discussion. The only things that are really clear are a person's index fingernail and the bird's beak and parts of its head, fortunately including the area around the eyes. So maybe if we consider the bird's head and the person's hands and not the bird in general as the subject, it could merit promotion. But I'd also like to know what the two globules above the person's thumb are and whether they should be in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 13:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: They're just bokeh balls. Something in the background must've caught the sun. And yes, the file is called "quail in hands" because the subject is a quail in someone's hands -- Thennicke 03:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment - I find the bokeh balls distracting. Do you think they add anything good to the photo, or would you consider removing them? -- Ikan Kekek 16:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose due to the bokeh balls. If you remove them, I might not vote for the picture (probably not), but I will strike this oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I could live with the sharpness of the head (although it's a limit case) but the index finger is really disturbing and should be cropped out. --Basotxerri 21:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Panissars1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Archaeological site of Panissars, ruins of the 11th ctry. monastery "Santa Maria de Panissars" near Le Perthus, France. --Palauenc05 14:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, unfavorable light and probably overprocessed (colour fringing on the edge between sky and hills) --A.Savin 18:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've uploaded a new version, please look again. --Palauenc05 17:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't usually concentrate on fringing, but prompted by A.Savin's remark, I looked at the previous version and the current version. The current version still has some of the fringing, so if that's a good reason to decline a promotion, it still applies to this photo (which is not merely a different version but a very different view). -- Ikan Kekek 13:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild  Oppose per A.Savin. --Basotxerri 21:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)