Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 09 2021

• 
  • Nomination Lens, Grands Bureaux de la Compagnie des mines (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 04:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, sharpness and resolution not good enough. --XRay 04:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail`s western stairs to Hohe Gloriette, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Wörther See, flower island and Maria Wörth from Hohe Gloriette, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern stairs down from the Hohe Gloriette on Gloriettenweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern curtain walls and keep of the castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staircase on the forest trail Gloriettenweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ojibway park, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Keating Channel and Gardiner Expressway, Toronto. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Havenbrook Park, Toronto. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scarborough Bluffs, Toronto. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scarborough Bluffs, Toronto. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Simón Bolívar in Cloister Santo Domingo of University of Cauca, Popayán, Colombia --Bgag 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Standing Committee on the Holy Week Procession, Popayán, Colombia --Bgag 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Standing Committee on the Holy Week Procession, Popayán, Colombia --Bgag 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calle 5, Popayán, Colombia --Bgag 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Patio Bolivar in Cloister Santo Domingo of University of Cauca, Popayán, Colombia --Bgag 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fresco of Jesus on the mount of olives. --Moroder 01:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque dedicated to Luigi Contratti. --Moroder 01:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque dedicated to Giuseppe Cesare Abba. --Moroder 01:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quadrifora on the Civil building Broletto in Brescia. --Moroder 01:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corsia del Gambero passage in Brescia. --Moroder 01:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiskaregatan 18, Vaxholm --Liberaler Humanist 21:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The eastern shore of Norrhamnen, Vaxholm --Liberaler Humanist 21:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamngatan 24, Vaxholm --Liberaler Humanist 21:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad bottom crop, top crop is too narrow and left part is hanging to the right --Michielverbeek 21:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiskaregatan 16, Vaxholm --Liberaler Humanist 21:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apple AirPods Max --Arne Müseler 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apple AirPods Max with case --Arne Müseler 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit cross on mount Cima di Rovareccio, Piedmont, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 15:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A bit tight at the bottom but just ok --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path to Lysá hora mountain in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 14:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path to Lysá hora mountain in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 14:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path to Lysá hora mountain in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 14:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path to Lysá hora mountain in Moravian-Silesian Beskids --T.Bednarz 14:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree at Duże Skałki quarry in Czajowice --Jakubhal 13:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion A very well done portrayal of a tree. -- Liberaler Humanist 18:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tree at Duże Skałki quarry in Czajowice --Jakubhal 13:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion A very well done portrayal of a tree. -- Liberaler Humanist 18:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit cross of Mount Alom, Piedmont, Italy --Mænsard vokser 10:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Duże Skałki quarry in Czajowice --Jakubhal 10:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Takapou Bay in Tasman Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 09:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the main portal of Wetzlarer Dom, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 09:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Rotorua in Rotorua, Bay of Plenty, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 09:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Towers of the Naumburg Cathedral, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Tournasol7 09:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Granada 10:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Duże Skałki quarry in Czajowice --Jakubhal 09:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A bit too dark, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 09:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petrified tree fossil, Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona, USA --Poco a poco 09:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dehulled kernels of sunflower seeds --Poco a poco 09:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coprolite, Calatayud, Spain --Poco a poco 09:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graved pumpkin, San Antonio de Ibarra, Ecuador --Poco a poco 09:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Debashritaiitmandi 09:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maria im Wald Chapel in Bischberg --Ermell 07:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Field path at Michelsberg Forest near Bischberg --Ermell 07:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A bit too dark, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 09:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat --Ermell 07:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Track construction work between Ebing and Zapfendorf --Ermell 07:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schweinsmühle in Schweinthal in Egloffstein --Ermell 07:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Crop at the bottom could be better. --XRay 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Grove snail, Cepaea nemoralis --Llez 07:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. Location: former sluice from 1926. Remnants of the sluice.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Granada 05:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Florian Kolb of Austria --Granada 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Christian Deuschl of Austria --Granada 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Severin Reiter of Austria --Granada 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Ozbej Jelen of Slovenia --Granada 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination FIS Nordic Combined Continental Cup Eisenerz 2020. Picture shows Grant Andrews of the USA --Granada 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eine-Welt-Laden (during Aktion Kultur[Fenster]) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Granada 05:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Disused arm (Alte Fahrt) of the Dortmund-Ems Canal near Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Granada 05:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drops on a pasture gate in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Granada 05:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lüdinghausen Gate in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weekly market on Coesfelder Strasse in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking trail`s western stairs to Hohe Gloriette, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gazebo "High Gloriette" on Gloriettenweg in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Pörtschach am Wörther See from the gazebo "High Gloriette" in Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Wörther See, flower island and Maria Wörth, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hotel Castle Seefels in Töschling, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Malasombra, Establés, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 11:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I think that the right side of the castle should be vertical as well. --Ermell 16:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 09:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• * Nomination Sculptural composition "Moose". Tambov Region, Russia. --Саня Новиков 20:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC) * Promotion QI to me if the CA is removed --Poco a poco 13:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)  Done Check, please. --Саня Новиков 17:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination Sculptural composition "Moose". Tambov Region, Russia. --Саня Новиков 20:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    QI to me if the CA is removed --Poco a poco 13:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
     Done Check, please. --Саня Новиков 17:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunker de l'Abbiette, Fromelles, Nord France.--Pierre André Leclercq 10:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La rue des Mûriers à Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost, le premier janvier 2021. --Benoît Prieur 10:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Seems tilted to me. --T.Bednarz 00:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Tilted but not fixed - sorry! --Scotch Mist 15:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colle di Val d'Elsa, Italy --Ввласенко 09:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    A nice view, but the sky shows much posterization/pixelation. Any chance to smooth it? --Aristeas 14:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
     Done - Is it better? -- Ввласенко 10:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Thank you! Yes, it’s better now. --Aristeas 11:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Erinaceus europaeus by User:PetroKaterynych --Anntinomy 23:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Species? --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
     Comment Species has been added. --Aristeas 14:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good to me, thanks --Podzemnik 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallinago gallinago. By User:PetroKaterynych --Anntinomy 23:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of the building at 22 Rue d'Oultres in Estaing, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brands village in Roppenheim (Bas-Rhin,France). --Gzen92 09:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Association football match of the first round of Czech Cup (MOL Cup) between the teams of SK Dětmarovice and FC Hlučín --T.Bednarz 00:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sifton Bog, London, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 00:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There are some copyedit spots on the top of the picture. See the note, can you please check? (there are more of then across the top edge) --Podzemnik 05:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
     Done: thank you for the review, removed the artifacts.--The Cosmonaut 02:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Nice, thanks. Very beautiful light --Podzemnik 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bad Homburg city promenade in Mariánské Lázně, Cheb District, Karlovy Vary Region, Czechia --T.Bednarz 15:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There is some chromatic abberation around the stone etc. and the buildings are not straight --Podzemnik 09:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
     Done @Podzemnik: I did my best. The CA of this lens is outrageous :(. Thanks for the review! --T.Bednarz 14:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
    There are also dust spots --Podzemnik 21:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
     Done Should be OK now. --T.Bednarz 12:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Thanks --Podzemnik 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bad Homburg city promenade in Mariánské Lázně, Cheb District, Karlovy Vary Region, Czechia --T.Bednarz 15:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Again, strong CA. Did you bring up your shadows? Some parts look quite dark --Podzemnik 09:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
     Done --T.Bednarz 14:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
    Also, there are dust spots --Podzemnik 21:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
     Done Hope all's goos now. --T.Bednarz 12:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
     Support Thanks --Podzemnik 21:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Keyhole_Side_Trail1.jpg

• Nomination Keyhole Side Trail, Nottawasaga Bluffs Conservation Area, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 04:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Unsharp. --Bgag 14:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Bgag. --Peulle 20:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Keyhole_Side_Trail2.jpg

• Nomination Keyhole Side Trail, Nottawasaga Bluffs Conservation Area, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 04:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Unsharp.--Bgag 14:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacking in detail. --Peulle 20:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Keyhole_Side_Trail3.jpg

• Nomination Keyhole Side Trail, Nottawasaga Bluffs Conservation Area, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 04:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Where is the focus? Unsharp. --Kallerna 07:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose +1. --Peulle 20:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 22:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Burgruine_SW-Mauer_26122020_0268.jpg

• Nomination Southwestern spur wall at the castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Subject? Shadows adjusted too much. --Kallerna 21:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

• The subject is the wall of the ruin. You can see that clearly. --XRay 07:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I don't see the opposer's point. --T.Bednarz 10:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --A.Savin 11:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 20:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:GRP_123_in_the_Marais_d'Harchies-Hensies-Pommerœul_(DSC_0985).jpg

• Nomination GRP 123 / GR 121 walking path in the Marais d'Harchies-Hensies-Pommerœul (Bernissart, Parc naturel des Plaines de l'Escaut, Belgium) --Trougnouf 08:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Underexposed, dull light. --Kallerna 21:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Exposition's cool. --T.Bednarz 10:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me--Pierre André Leclercq 15:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The light is indeed dull, but if that's how it looked, that's how it looked. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Étang_Canaron_(DSC_0982).jpg

• Nomination Étang Canaron in Marais d'Harchies-Hensies-Pommerœul (Bernissart, Parc naturel des Plaines de l'Escaut, Belgium) --Trougnouf 08:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose dull light. --Kallerna 21:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment That is what winter hiking typically looks like in Belgium. It's a representative image. I enjoy this sight and I'm sharing what I saw. You may not like the subject but that's entirely irrelevant to Commons:Image_guidelines#Quality_and_featured_photographic_images. --Trougnouf 08:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. I confirm this sky with a dull light, is typical in Flanders during the winter season. That which does not prevent the photo from being good..--Pierre André Leclercq 15:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, and I defer to the others' statements about how the light looks in Flanders in winter. -- Ikan Kekek 20:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Leonsteiner_Weg_26122020_0260.jpg

• Nomination Leonstain way, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Subject? Overprocessed shadows/highlights, harsh light. --Kallerna 21:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support The subject is Leonstain way, the contrast isn't strong enough to hide anything, and the image is sharp throughout. --Trougnouf 08:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 08:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Question is the blue light on the right part of the scene or a cloning error? --Trougnouf 08:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment No, I did not clone anything. -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Leonsteiner_Weg_26122020_0261.jpg

• Nomination Leonstein way, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed sky, overprocessed shadows/highlights. --Kallerna 21:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kallerna; overexposed sky. --Trougnouf 09:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Sky OK for me. --Palauenc05 22:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The sky is perfect --Moroder 01:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Burgruine_nordöstliche_Schildmauer_26122020_0263.jpg

• Nomination Northeastern curtain wall of castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition, why portrait? The subject is fully in shadow. --Kallerna 21:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Portrait is necessary to show the height without perspective distortions. I think the exposure should be increased. I disagree with the settings (fast shutter speed with increased ISO for a static scene) but it may still be a QI if the level of noise/details is good after light adjustments. --Trougnouf 09:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition and the light --Moroder 01:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality to me, without prejudice to Trougnouf's advice, and I think the shadows are fine. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Leonstein_Burgruine_Vorwerk-Gebäude_im_äußeren_Hof_26122020_0265.jpg

• Nomination Forwark building north of the castle ruin Leonstein, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Basicly a duplicate, overexposed sky. --Kallerna 21:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I love this sky --Moroder 09:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition QI for me.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Camp_des_Gilets_jaunes_(Horbourg-Wihr)_(2).jpg

• Nomination Yellow vests camp in Horbourg-Wihr (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 18:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed sky - hard to look at. --Kallerna 22:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support The sky is not overexposed. More detail could be extracted (ie [1]) but that's the author's choice; it's fine as long as it doesn't look flatter than what they saw. What does "hard to look at" even means in this context? --Trougnouf 08:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support It seems now that QI photos can only be taken under the shining sun and with a blue sky --Moroder 09:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The light is a bit harsh but the photo is good to my eyes, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 20:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Thorayikadav_07729.jpg

• Nomination Bubulcus coromandus --Vengolis 02:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose the crop should be much tighter. The bird itself forms maybe 5 % of the photo. --Kallerna 08:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Nice photo of a bird in its habitat, and as such, the bird is big enough and sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Smial 13:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. --Moroder 04:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Antelope_Canyon-Utah1992.JPG

• Nomination Antelope Canyon, Utah, USA --Poco a poco 14:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
• Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 16:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Noise reduced --Poco a poco 13:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very small img with low detail & noise. The light is too harsh - the photo is both under- and overexposed. --Kallerna 08:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colour channel clipping in highlights, strong noise resp. denoising artifacts in dark areas, and too low resolution for a landscape image. --Smial 13:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Sierra_Nevada_Pradollano_panorama_2.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic view of Sierra Nevada skiing station, Spain. --Kallerna 12:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Overexposed buildings, too small file size for 48 MP, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 16:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  

• Too small file size for 48 MP, what, why? --Kallerna 18:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support looks like QI to me. --Trougnouf 20:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Really beautiful, but when buildings tilt up to the right, that's usually objected to at QIC, so I'm not sure how or whether to vote. -- Ikan Kekek 11:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Info tilt fixed. --Kallerna 15:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks  Support -- Ikan Kekek 21:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Info Images of 48 MP should typically have 20 MiB or above to be enough sharp and to not show compression artifacts --PantheraLeo1359531 13:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Usually, but that's in no way a rule. Noise is what takes up the most space because it's random hence unpredictable; a noise-free image will generally be much smaller. (Not entirely relevant to JPEG but this image can be compressed down to 0.07 bpp with good quality using SotA techniques because it is virtually noise-free.) Maybe the author used a compression level that visibly diminishes the details shown, but as long as we don't see compression artifacts then we have no way to tell whether that's the case. --Trougnouf 14:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
• Are you serious? Can you see some compression artifacts? We can sure upload enormous .tiff-files here, if more bits is more quality... --Kallerna 15:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Why are you so offended? I didn't talk about TIF files. It is just my view... --PantheraLeo1359531 13:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I see no problem here. --T.Bednarz 00:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bryce_Point_Panorama.jpg

• Nomination Bryce Canyon --GyozaDumpling 02:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, details missing. EXIF missing. --XRay 07:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

   Comment It looks like posterization. --XRay 11:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support IMO it's good for QI and EXIF data are not mandatory. However, geocode would be fine. --Palauenc05 09:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

I withdraw my support as there is no reaction by the nominator. --Palauenc05 21:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too soft in the lower area. --A.Savin 17:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I do see some imperfections, which can probably be traced back to a little too much noise reduction with subsequent over-sharpening, but because of the high resolution, I think they can be tolerated. --Smial 16:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Quality looks fine at 50%, which is still 14.6 MP - well above the minimum. --King of Hearts 20:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness, alignment and composition are insufficient. --Milseburg (talk) 21:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Question I like the image but doesn't it seem tilted to you folks? --T.Bednarz 00:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

• Since it is a panorama, the alignment of the single frames isn't correct. --Milseburg 11:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose I need to oppose until this is fixed, then. --T.Bednarz 17:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC))

File:Koehlbrandbruecke,_WPAhoi,_Hamburg_(P1080523).jpg

• Nomination Köhlbrandbrücke in Hamburg 2019 --MB-one 21:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
• Decline bad light. --Kallerna 09:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  @Kallerna: can you describe the issue more detailed? --MB-one 17:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  The subject is fully in shadow due to the direction of the sun. Please do not change back to nomination, discussion is the place if you do not agree with the review. --Kallerna 21:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  Kallerna, I take it, you oppose? -- Ikan Kekek 02:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  @Kallerna: Sorry, did not mean to revert the nomination status. Thanks for the clarification, but I would like to read more opinions. --MB-one 12:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Question A bot says sorry and wants to read more opinions? -- Ikan Kekek 08:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: I have no idea why, but it seems, that QICBot hijacked my comment. --MB-one 12:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and light contrast --Moroder 00:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment The cylindrical structures of the building on the lower right seem to be leaning up to the left. -- Ikan Kekek 00:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose C'moon, the subject is fully underexposed due to the direction of the sun. Basic stuff... --Kallerna 08:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Moroder but as per Ikan perspective adjustment required IMO (would support on successful adjustment) --Scotch Mist 16:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg (talk) 15:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bergues_-_Remparts_et_Fortifications_en_2020_(10).jpg

• Nomination Bergues - Remparts et Fortifications (Fr).--Pierre André Leclercq 10:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Leaning to the left. --Ermell 11:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
• Strong tilt, overexposed areas --Poco a poco 12:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Correction leaning to the left, and adjustment of inclination and overexposure zone. Thank you vor your advices.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
• It needs some sharpening, it looks too soft --Poco a poco 12:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks for the review, enhanced sharpness with a radius of 3,000, regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 14:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
    • Not convinced to be honest, I ask for a second opinion --Poco a poco 20:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support, marginal sharpness to me, but I'll support. I totally wouldn't mind for this to go to CR. -- Ikan Kekek 02:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco --Ermell 16:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Moroder 00:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Harsh light. --Kallerna 08:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 09:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 16:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)