Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 09 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mei_Feingold,_ESC2014_Meet_&_Greet_11.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mei Feingold. By User:Abbedabb --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: too unsharp on her right side, sorry. --Peulle 11:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The image is noisy due to the 1400 ISO, but I couldn't say that it would be not sharp. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose focus should be on the near side of the face, but it isn't. --MB-one 17:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support available light image in full resolution, not a studio shot, therefore by far good enough. -- Smial 19:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per MB-one.--Ermell 19:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The eyes should be sharp. --XRay 06:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 11:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

File:At_Cagliari,_Sardinia_2019_060.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The ceiling and chandelier of San Michele church in Cagliari, Italy. --Mike Peel 07:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Weak support Good perspective, good lighting, but very grainy --D-Kuru 10:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree. Burned highlights, CA and a lot of noise. --Ermell 16:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree with Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise, sharpness should be better, CAs in green and red, very bright windows. --XRay 06:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 11:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)