Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 08 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Rame_Station_Tramway_IdF_Ligne_1_Marché_Saint_Denis_-_Saint-Denis_(FR93)_-_2022-01-01_-_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tram of Paris Tramway Line 1 at Saint-Denis market tram station, Saint-Denis in Seine-Saint-Denis department, France. --Chabe01 19:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Level of detail is too low. --Augustgeyler 20:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Detail is fine IMO. --MB-one 21:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support The level of detail is fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan --Sandro Halank 12:05, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Sts_Peter_and_Paul_church_in_Promilhanes_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 01:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment IMO the branches are disturbing, at the left ones. --XRay 06:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per @XRay: --Trougnouf 12:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)  Support --Trougnouf 10:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe the branches on the left can be cloned out? I would definitely support it with this edit. --Lion-hearted85 23:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree but it hasn't been done since December 25th. --Trougnouf 16:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would do it myself, but I think it's more respectful to wait for Tournasol7's input at least. --Lion-hearted85 18:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support, but I preferred the original version, in which branches on both sides complemented each other. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support The branches at the right are acceptable, but, Ikan, at the left they were seems lost. But now it's OK. --XRay 09:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you Tournasol7, it looks good to me. --Lion-hearted85 13:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 17:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Johannaweg_Buchenhecke_17122021_1918.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Snow covered shrubs at the promenade on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 07:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting background. --Kallerna 17:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 13:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Do not understand the criticism. There is an object with decent sharpness and good lighting and exposure against a blurry but apparently natural background. --Smial 13:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment it's really a pity if you consider this to be QI-level composition and subject. --Kallerna 10:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 Comment When I see how much junk is otherwise approved here as QI, I really can't decline this photo. --Smial 11:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Feel free to decline the junk, I also try to improve the quality of the quality images. --Kallerna 15:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 18:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial. --Palauenc05 11:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 17:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)