Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 06 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2019-01-24_Men's_Preliminary_Run_at_FIL_World_Luge_Championships_2019_by_Sandro_Halank–087.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Men's Training at the FIL World Luge Championships 2019 in Winterberg: Žiga Biruš (Slovenia) --Sandro Halank 00:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose tilted, poor composition --Charlesjsharp 22:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Seems like a pretty good portrait to me. Which way is the tilt? -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I see, the building is tilted, not the person. I don't care about that, per Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 11:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment The building is tilted because it's on a mountainside that has a different level than the platform on which the athlete is standing. --Sandro Halank 18:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Slight overexposure an slight ccw tilt. But since the face is well exposed and since it is an outdoor portrait and not architecture photography, and the sharpness is good, I'll support. --Smial 21:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_November_2015_(081).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wolfgang Luisser, assistent coach of Austria U21. --Steindy 00:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 00:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose hand cropped --Charlesjsharp 22:34, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment Note: Charlesjsharp likes to reject my photos. Today three opposes again. --Steindy 22:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine portrait, intense facial expression. It's unimportant for his whole hand to be visible. -- Ikan Kekek 10:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me --Jakubhal 11:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support This time a photo that doesn't look over-processed. Perhaps a portrait format would have been more favourable in this composition, but in a reportage situation you often have neither the choice nor enough time for that. The photo may not be perfectly designed, but it is good enough in any case. A stroke of luck are the heavily blurred rectangular structures in the background (buildings?), which contribute positively to the image effect both in thumb size and in full resolution. --Smial 08:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan and Smial’s remarkable reasoning. --Aristeas 10:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 10:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)