Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 05 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hogevank_Monastery_22-10-2018_v3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hogevank Monastery in Shirak province, Armenia. --Armenak Margarian 18:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The bottom part is unsharp. --Tournasol7 00:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Just a tad at full size, but it looks quite good at 300% of my screen, which is already quite big, considering how much of a closeup this is. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 14:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 22:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 12:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Seven Pandas 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Screenshot_Mandelbulber_2.20_20191224.png

[edit]

  • Nomination A screenshot of the workspace of Mandelbulber. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment I'm not sure if this really fits QI. QI is about images taken/created by Wikimedia users. In my opinion a program UI is not Wikimedia user self made enough. I set the image to discussion and want to hear a second opinion on that --D-Kuru 21:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Quality screenshots? No. I already have a certain problem with the artistic representations of the Menger Sponges, because the pretty colour effects suggest structures that are not present in the mathematical construct in my humble opinion. But since I am not a mathematician, I do not want to discuss this in detail. But the arrangement of windows and control elements of a software with the final pressure on the printscreen-key cannot be recognized as a high quality picture. What comes next? Are we going to get discussions whether a Full-HD screenshot with 1920*1080 in 2020 is still considered high resolution enough or not? At least, and fortunately, we were spared arguments about dust spots, CA and image noise... --Smial 10:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)