Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 03 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charnel house on the cemetery in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outside stairs to the organ gallery at the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave altar for the commander of the II. and III. Italian Legion Valerius Claudius Quintus (CIL III 4855), exposed at the northwestern corner of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Table and bench in front of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Half-banded Mitre, Vexillum semifasciatum --Llez 23:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A couple of humans watch the Semois river from a bench in Vresse-sur-Semois --Trougnouf 20:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Philippi, Basilica A --Berthold Werner 11:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Duméril's Madagascar swift (Oplurus quadrimaculatus), Isalo --Charlesjsharp 11:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gold dust day gecko (Phelsuma laticauda) Nosy Komba --Charlesjsharp 11:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful gecko and good quality. It's on the side of a chair? -- Ikan Kekek 11:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
indeed it is. Charlesjsharp 16:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madagascar giant day gecko (Phelsuma grandis) , Nosy Komba --Charlesjsharp 11:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mossy leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus sikorae), Montagne d’Ambre --Charlesjsharp 11:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Fantastic camouflage! Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
wait till you see it asleep and waking up! --Charlesjsharp 16:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, forgot to promote before. -- Ikan Kekek 00:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villel de Mesa, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 10:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Torralba de los Frailes, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 10:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, Spain --Poco a poco 10:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche Speedster at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally, Stage 2 --Ermell 07:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 911 Targa at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally, Stage 2 --Ermell 07:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woman with hat adorned with small chains. --Dorieo 07:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
The noise in the dark parts could be removed. It would be helpful to know what the woman does. She looks like an actor? --Ermell 07:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC). Done I've attenuated the noise. She's a model --Dorieo 07:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand Degrés Saint-Louis in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Cheverny, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Granada 11:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hôtel de la Graviere in Loches, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Castle of Montrésor, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Some of those interior pictures would be good FPC --Podzemnik 06:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Chambord, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deciduous biotope under beech trees.
--Famberhorst 06:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Deciduous biotope under beech trees.
-
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. Rapids in the upper reaches of Flembach Creek. F-getal f /5.6.
--Famberhorst 06:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. Rapids in the upper reaches of Flembach Creek. F-getal f /5.6.
-
- Nomination Relief above the door of Queen's Park Baptist Church, Glasgow --Podzemnik 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Strathbungo Queen's Park Church, Glasgow --Podzemnik 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Langside Synagogue, Glasgow --Podzemnik 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main door to Langside Synagogue, Glasgow --Podzemnik 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate to Langside Synagogue, Glasgow --Podzemnik 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. Forest biotope.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. Forest biotope.
-
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. View from the mountain road.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. View from the mountain road.
-
- Nomination Dardin Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian. Detail of the church building.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Dardin Pfarrkirche St. Sebastian. Detail of the church building.
-
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Fountain on the village square. (Detail).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Fountain on the village square. (Detail).
-
- Nomination Bath with free entrance in Goritschach, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Wörther See from Ufersteig in Pritschitz, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quality is good but could you please remove dust spots in the right corner? --Podzemnik 06:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Done @Podzemnik: Thank you. Dustspots removed. --Johann Jaritz 06:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Perfecto Johann! --Podzemnik 06:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old fire station on Pritschitzer Weg in Pritschitz, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on Pritschitzer Weg #7 in Pritschitz, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway line Drautalbahn II in Pritschitz, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freezing rain in Quebec city --The Photographer 02:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm going to type this once, but it's a general comment: I think you should be more specific in your filenames and titles. -- Ikan Kekek 06:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freezing rain in Quebec city --The Photographer 02:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Though, I think the image could use a tiny tiny tilt to the left :) --Podzemnik 06:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Śnieżne Kotły, Krkonoše, Sudetes 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 16:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lamentation of Christ Procession on Good Friday, Holy Week of Ágreda, Soria, Spain. --Poco a poco 11:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Right side a bit noisy, but imo OK for QI --Isiwal 21:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f-4 PRO front lens with lens hood --Ermell 07:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quality is great but I think it's tilted. Will you check please? --Podzemnik 07:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC) Done You were right. Thanks for your hint.--Ermell 17:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Thank yoou! --Podzemnik 06:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 16:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 13:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 16:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you improve the description, the three photos has the same description --Ezarate 23:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Done --Milan Bališin 14:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC) Support Instruktive annotations.--Milseburg 13:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statues of Hindu deities --Fitindia 13:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add more information into the description. What deitis? Where was the picture taken? --Podzemnik 15:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Have added some info to the description. Please do have a look. Thank you --Fitindia 16:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose When I look at it again, I don't think the quality is good enough for QI, sorry --Podzemnik 07:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Statues of Hindu deities --Fitindia 13:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 17:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 17:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Assumption of Our Lady, Calmarza, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 11:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Tilted? --Podzemnik 12:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
fixed --Poco a poco 12:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Yupiii --Podzemnik 07:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas market in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 08:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Great moment but what's on the picture? Could you please provide more information into the description and categories? That's be great! --Podzemnik 10:38, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Done I improved the description. Thanks for your advice. --XRay 07:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment @Podzemnik: Please review again. --XRay 11:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Great, thanks. Sorry sometimes it takes me a while to go through my comments --Podzemnik 07:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Concerta_aon_dhuillear.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Concerta 27mg and a United States $1 Bill --E.3 06:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 08:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC) - Comment Thanks for that. I can take this image again, will request help from a good photographer E.3 10:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support
It needs better categorization, butthe image quality seems ok to me. --MB-one 11:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC) - Comment - OK, IMO, but you need to add a category for the dollar bill. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks yes I added $1 and medical controversies as thats obviously what it is E.3 15:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - The sharpness of the dollar bill is arguable, but I think that it's good enough in context. -- Ikan Kekek 15:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 22:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Gazelle (Nanger granti), Tsavo East National Park, Kenýa.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Grant's gazelle in Tsavo East National Park --E.3 00:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Pudelek 01:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Picture is unsharp. (Btw, the file name is meaningless) --A.Savin 14:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thanks again for your meaningless comment, Mr Savin. The word "meaningless" has a lot of deep meaning to many people, and I suggest that you do not use it. E.3 06:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment QI criteria actually demand that the file name be "meaningful", i.e. it should be specific for what is shown by the image. Here the main subject is a gazelle, but the file name seems to say just "Nature in Kenya". The word "meaningful" is used by the guidelines. It is not Savin's personal wording, so there is nothing to complain about. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yes I do know that, but artistic "mentally ill" but not really people like me can get very offended by that word in particular. I have apoloigsed to Mr Savin for the attack above and I'm just trying to build consensus to avoid using some of the words that made me not want to contribute to the amazing project of the Wikimedia Commons. A lot of good artists "struggle", and many misunderstand each other on the internet like me. I'm happy to change it to a more descriptive word of course but I'd just like it to remain in the original language. E.3 11:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment QI criteria actually demand that the file name be "meaningful", i.e. it should be specific for what is shown by the image. Here the main subject is a gazelle, but the file name seems to say just "Nature in Kenya". The word "meaningful" is used by the guidelines. It is not Savin's personal wording, so there is nothing to complain about. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 19:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per M.Savin. Very unsharp on the head. -- Ikan Kekek 21:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral There is no focus problem. The picture looks unsharp in the background and on the fur of the animal, because noise reduction was a bit too aggressive. Lens sharpness also falls off to the border, which is common for many affordable lenses at open apertures. I could live with that for this special subject. However it is a matter of taste, and I know that QI standards have become more picky in that respect during the last years. Thus I stay neutral. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Not the sharpest, but still acceptable. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 22:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
==
[edit]- Nomination Martha Erika Alonso de Moreno Valle, Gobernador del Estado Rafael Moreno Valle. By User:Martha Erika Alonso de Moreno Valle --Ezarate 21:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood quality. --Peulle 22:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Vote changed until the point below has been addressed.--Peulle 21:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I doubt this is a photo taken by a commoner. Only one contribution by that user, and in the exif the autor's name is "SEFPRO". --Smial 23:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose agree smial Seven Pandas 03:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 22:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Citroen_2_CV_Dolly,_Bj._1987_(2012-06-10_Sp_b).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Citroën 2 CV Dolly from 1987 in motion Spurzem 20:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Downsized? In any case I think it's got too low resolution with too little detail for a QI. --Peulle 22:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Peulle: Apparently, the name of the nominator plays a bigger role for the positive rating of a photo than the quality of the image. I can only wonder what weak images of recent days have been classified as QI and what is devalued. I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 22:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support. Good enough. Action shot with about 6 MPix. --Smial 11:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support "Downsized"? It still has almost 6 MP. It has obviously been cropped, which is OK according to the rules. So what is the problem here? Good quality, no doubt. --Palauenc05 21:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Per Palauenc05. --Johannes Robalotoff 22:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst 07:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 22:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Московский_Кремль_Москва-река.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Kremlin and Moskva River --E.3 04:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review
SupportGood quality, metadata would be appreciated --Trougnouf 11:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)- Oppose Please, improve the categories first, that building is called Kremlin. The current categories are very poor. The bottom right crop and the level of sharpness are not really convincing, either. --Poco a poco 19:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- conditional needs proper categorization --Trougnouf 19:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
SupportThanks for the comments I have recategorized. Can anyone help with the metadata being on the main image? --E.3 03:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Metadata will automatically show up if they're embedded on the image. Some software (s.a. bm3d-gpu) will strip metadata, and there are programs that can restore it (eg "exiftool -TagsFromFile imagewithmetadata.jpg imagemissingmetadata.jpg") --Trougnouf 17:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I would support, but you need to include Category:Moscow Kremlin and Category:Moskva River in Moscow, not parent categories as you do now. -- Ikan Kekek 20:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- thanks I've made it as per those categories now I couldn't work out why there was not Kremlin category E.3 00:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, image is tilted (anti-clockwise), the light is not good, as well as the cut at the right. --A.Savin 02:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per my remarks above, though if there's a tilt, try to remedy it. -- Ikan Kekek 08:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I thought QIC should be viewed at 100% to review it adequately. Here in this picture, obviously, already in preview enough issues are visible to say "no QI". Disappointing, IkanKekek --A.Savin 14:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Why do you think it's necessary to view all photos at 100% to determine whether they're QIs? As for tilts, I'm simply not that good at seeing them, but I do think E.3 should remedy any tilt there is. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- As for this picture, I wrote that already in preview flaws are visible, so you seem to be missing the point. And yes, of course it is necessary to view at 100% to judge the sharpness and noise -- at least I don't know any other way. --A.Savin 01:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I think a bit of unsharpness or noise at a huge full size is unimportant, generally speaking. I found the light OK and didn't mind the crops. I also find it hard not to support when I said I would if x or y condition were fulfilled. -- Ikan Kekek 22:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I only know how to change the tilt with my iphone which i dont really like using at the moment so i'll ask at the image workshop E.3 03:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 13:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)