Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 03 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Rotten pumpkins in cloister garden Abenberg.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rotten Pumpkins --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --PumpkinSky 11:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry for interfering but this is the same shot as an already promoted QI (see EXIF data). The same image can only be nominated once for QI. --Basotxerri 18:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes it's just a derivative work - or the other way around, but still.--Peulle 12:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment War mir jetzt auch neu. Ihr solltet euch dann zumindest an die eigenen Regeln auch halten. Dabei ging es mir nur gar nicht. Ich wollte eben den Vergleich zu der b/w-Version darstellen, was eine identische Grundlage benötigt. Ich könnte auch eines aus der Belichtungsserie nehmen, ist mir jetzt aber irgendwie auch zu... Aber total "schnuckig" das sofort Ergänzungen zu bereits erteilten Aufnahmen ergänzt werden.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment The idea is to avoid people nominating many slightly different versions of the same image, that's all. No point in clogging up the system with unnecessary nominations. One version of each image should be enough.--Peulle 03:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 00:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment By the way, the file name of this and the B&W has pumpkins spelled wrong, the second "p" is missing. PumpkinSky 04:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Oops, missed the wrong spelling of the word "pumpkin". But in the b/w the town is called Abendberg, here it's spelled correct Abenberg. --Granada 12:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Changing my vote to oppose due to the other image being the EXACT same image. Plus I am not cool with basic spelling errors in names of the image and location. Just for the record, we do allow multiple QIs of the same object if they have different times taken, different settings (shutter, fstop, ISO, etc)--there are multiple instances of this. But these two images are simply different by clicking B&W in Photoshop. PumpkinSky 22:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

@PumkinSky: If you are serious, can you pls. explain your Negative with ID: 9596E102E485A1F5A17C04C60FB84E0A It´s EXACT the same, and it´s strange bcs. you fingerpoint inline rules you don´t work with. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:30, 06 Januar 2018 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 23:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)