Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 02 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Blue-nosed chameleon (Calumma linotum) male Montagne d’Ambre 2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Blue-nosed chameleon (Calumma boettgeri) male, Montagne d’Ambre --Charlesjsharp 10:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Nice motif but the tip of the nail is missing --Poco a poco 11:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not a valid use of QI criteria. See my decline of church interior image --Charlesjsharp 11:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think he means "tail", in which case he has a point...--Peulle 22:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment If the QI guidelines were to be changed to include rejection for bits missing - a judgmental point - then huge numbers of images would fail - see church above. I would actually support such a change, but until then should it be a valid reason for rejection? If so, then my oppose vote above stays. If not, I'll remove it. We have to be fair, so Peulle, as an independent voter, can we rely on you to study both images! Charlesjsharp 10:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I'll support, but let's be fair: The absence of all or even a small part of any animal that is not expressly described as "closeup of face" or whatever is a well-established reason to vote to decline at QIC, whether it should be or not. -- Ikan Kekek 11:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too tight crop, very unpleasant lighting with direct flash, low DOF. --Smial 11:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  • By all means decline Smial, but always wise to be accurate when being giving a critique of photographic technique. DoF is F11, which is not low. And it is not a direct flash. A slave off-camera flash was used to show skin detail which you wouldn't get with a direct flash - see the two catchlights in the eye. Charlesjsharp 16:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The eye is sharp, parts of the body are less sharp, the tail is not sharp. That is low DOF. If the subject is rather small and the distance between soubject and camera is low, F11 may be not sufficiant. There are hard and unpleasant shadows, which are caused by direct lighting. It doesn't matter whether the flash was placed a few hand's widths to the left or right of the camera, it still remains hard, frontal illumination. --Smial 00:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Fiat147-Tandil.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Deteriorated Fiat 147 parked in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 23:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment You need removed the heavy CAs... --Tournasol7 00:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Ezarate 11:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
      •  Comment Sorry, but it's not done. We can see a dark blue CAs on the car. --Tournasol7 14:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done Ezarate 16:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overloaded photo, Vanneau Asocial 09:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks ok to me --Poco a poco 12:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Me, too, for whatever that's worth. -- Ikan Kekek 11:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support It's better now. Thank you for your corrections. Tournasol7 14:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Urban_settlements_beside_Crown_Prince_Tenzing_Kunzang_Namgyal_Walkway_in_Gangtok.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Urban settlements beside Crown Prince Tenzing Kunzang Namgyal Walkway in Gangtok. A shot taken from ropeway.--Subhrajyoti07 10:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Good detail and colors, but should be upright --MB-one 15:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - The photo was taken from such an angle that making it upright is very difficult. Straightening one side is distorting the rest. - Subhrajyoti07 18:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment Of course one cannot correct perspective at this angle. But colors look oversaturated to me. --Johannes Robalotoff 11:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - The greens were too saturated and has been muted. hope this takes care. Rest colors are looking OK to me - Subhrajyoti07 18:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment Still not convinced. Does anyone else have an opinion? --Johannes Robalotoff 18:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)\
  •  Support - IMO, good quality and good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 11:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough after rework. --Smial 11:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 19:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)