Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 28 2024
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
-
-
![* Nomination Natural monument "Lime tree above the Winterhof ['winter farm']" near Kirchlauter --Plozessor 04:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) * Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Linde_oberhalb_des_Winterhofes_02.jpg/80px-Linde_oberhalb_des_Winterhofes_02.jpg)
-
-
-
- Nomination Residential building on Sallacher Straße #63 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on Sallacher Straße #75 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on Sallacher Straße #80 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on Sallacher Straße #80 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building on Sallacher Straße #85 in Sallach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern Gray Squirrel having a snack in a flowering pear tree --Relativity 02:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural in Centro, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 01:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural in Zona Romántica, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 01:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statuette at Casa Kimberly, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 01:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK for a QI --Jakubhal 04:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Good Fortune Unicorn, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 01:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Relativity 02:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tägerwilen, canton of Thurgau: Veranda on the west side of the Müller-Thurgau house. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hauptstr. 75 in Tägerwilen, canton of Thurgau. Timber framed house in the appearance of the 17th/18th century. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaesanjodang Gate at Tongdosa Temple, Sinpyeong, South Korea --Bgag 00:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paper lanterns at Tongdosa Temple, South Korea --Bgag 00:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Myeongbujeon Hall at Tongdosa Temple, South Korea --Bgag 00:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jangdokdae at Tongdosa Temple, South Korea --Bgag 00:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buddha's sarira stupa at Tongdosa Temple, South Korea --Bgag 00:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coffee roastery in Dokkum, the Netherland. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coffee roastery at Legeweg 5 in Dokkum, the Netherlands. --JoachimKohler-HB 23:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Village name sign in Zhigansk. --Alexander Novikov 19:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larus argentatus on the Lena river. --Alexander Novikov 19:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The bird is blurry --Tagooty 03:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in the rural locality Zhigansk. --Alexander Novikov 19:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 23:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Portugal, Fatima, Basílica de Nossa Senhora do Rosário --Berthold Werner 17:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Tehran University Faculty of Agriculture in Iran, this university was established in 1900 and is the most prestigious agricultural university in this country -- Parsa 2au (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, this is an interesting picture but unfortunately the quality is not adequate for QI due massive NR by the smartphone (the wall structure is largely blurred etc.). Also it would need slight perspective correction and better categorization. --Plozessor 04:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Valentin Madouas during Faun-Ardèche Classic 2024 By Kakoula10 --Shougissime 14:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 14:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Itzehoe Breite Straße 2 --Nightflyer 12:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shy albatross (Thalassarche cauta) --Charlesjsharp 12:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Oversharpened --Jakubhal 14:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shy albatross (Thalassarche cauta) --Charlesjsharp 12:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Borderline because of denoising but still ok --Poco a poco 12:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arum idaeum --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow-lipped sea krait (Laticauda colubrina), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 10:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Farmhouse Kirchstr. 13 in Detern, East Frisia --JoachimKohler-HB 07:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Fine but there is some tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 10:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. Should be better now. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Audi Activesphere Concept at IAA 2023 --Alexander-93 14:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cupra DarkRebel Concept at IAA 2023 --Alexander-93 14:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kia EV9 at IAA 2023 --Alexander-93 14:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Lookout dock de los Brujos, Yelqui Hill, Lemuy Island. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
The right part is focused on the statue and the background becomes blurry, I think you should crop that part away (or use another picture with correct focus if you have one). Also, the roof of that building on the left is burned out. --Plozessor 04:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Done Thanks for review. --Rjcastillo 18:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but the right ca. 2200 pixels are still blurry (focus is on the statue) and the roof is still burned. --Plozessor 07:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the review, I'll try to fix it. --Rjcastillo 16:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz S214 220d in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kia EV9 GT-Line in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Passat Variant B9 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Passat Variant B9 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Potassium ferricyanide crystals --Keresluna 03:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
This has a strange distribution of noise, was it processed with AI? --Plozessor 06:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
It was focus stacked, maybe that is causing this strange distribution? --Keresluna 15:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Sounds feasible. Wouldn't a single picture with high f-stop be better? --Plozessor 06:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
I had already maxed out the f-stop on my camera. --Keresluna 17:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Ok, I don't know the details as those are missing from the file, but I think a reasonable camera with highest f-stop should be able to take a sharp picture of this subject in one go. In any case, the image is noisy, and the white background has irregular patterns (likely caused by stacking photos of different sharpness). --Plozessor 07:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll retake this photo. --Keresluna 18:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Oppose irregular patterns due focus stacking --Plozessor 19:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Actinote pellenea on flower at the Chimbote Tree Nursery, Peru --Felino Volador 22:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Phalcoboenus megalopterus near Punta Union, Huascaran National Park, Peru --Felino Volador 22:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gates of Novgorod Plant of Lenin's Komsomol photographed at winter. Velikiy Novgorod, Russia. --Красный 11:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 15:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A grey heron (Ardea cinerea) nest building in Parc Georges-Valbon, France. --Alexis Lours 11:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Review
I'd apply some denoising --Poco a poco 20:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coffee shop Kersen, Alem street, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
tilted CW (needs to be fixed) and a bit noisy (would be nice to be fixed) --MB-one 10:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, look if is enough --Ezarate 12:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Noise is better, but it's still tilted and has green fringes now (that weren't visible before) --MB-one 14:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks I forgot to process the CA in the new processment --Ezarate 17:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Support Now good quality. --MB-one 21:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance to the village of Kryshtopivske --Nikride 08:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
Can you perspective correct (see left posts) and sharpen? --Mike Peel 22:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
* @Mike Peel
Fixed --Nikride 16:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Sharpeness is better, but I think the perspective went the wrong way - the poles on the left lean more now, but should be vertical? --Mike Peel 10:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Done does that look better? --Nikride 11:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
![* Nomination Natural monument "Lime tree above the Winterhof ['winter farm']" near Kirchlauter --Plozessor 04:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) * Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)](/wiki/File:Linde_oberhalb_des_Winterhofes_02.jpg)
_-_447.jpg)
_-_485.jpg)
_-_065.jpg)
_-_348.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_8354.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_in_flight_Bruny_2.jpg)
_in_flight_Bruny_4.jpg)
,_Anilao,_Filipinas,_2023-08-23,_DD_05.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]File:At_Montevideo_2023_170.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Bust of Amado Nervo, Montevideo --Mike Peel 07:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the shadows on the statue's eyes. Alexander Novikov 11:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me. --Plozessor 06:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 11:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Another Believer 17:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Milseburg 14:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Promoted --Milseburg 14:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)File:5-7_Bulevardul_Gheorghe_Magheru,_Bucharest_(04).jpg
[edit]File:5-7 Bulevardul Gheorghe Magheru, Bucharest (04).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nomination Hotel Lido in Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 16:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Oppose Potential FOP issue, being discussed at the DR. --A1Cafel 03:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC) Support It depends of the construction period. Can you prove it ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment I don't like that, but you are right for this one. --Sebring12Hrs 08:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC) - Oppose I agree with A1Cafel. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined --Milseburg 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined --Milseburg 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)File:NutcrackerPasDeDeux2.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Grand Pas de Deux, The Nutcracker --Lambtron 21:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Decline
This could work out if you'd manage to reduce the chroma noise. --Plozessor 19:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Oppose Unfortunately 
Not done --Plozessor 15:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Support IMO Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 16:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Support. Good image and good quality. -- Spurzem 21:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) - Oppose for now. Uploaded version with reduced chroma noise. But a much better result could be achieved if the raw format were available, because the photo presented is clearly too compressed. NeatImage has also reduced these compression artifacts somewhat, but you can't do magic with it either. A pity, because it's a great action shot. --Smial 11:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is still rather noisy and some of the woman's fingers look peculiar. The image was taken at ISO 1,600, which is the highest ISO of this camera, and with f/2.8. So DOF is quite low anyway. Stronger noise reduction may lead to even less sharpness or the need for excessive sharpening resulting in artifacts. I am sorry, but it might be really difficult or impossible to repair this photo. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Robert, do you think, that you could take a better photo of a comparable scene? This is a question I nearly always ask myself before declaring a photo that someone else took a failure. Best regards -- Spurzem 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not Robert, but I think I could achieve a way better result from this picture's raw file. --Plozessor 19:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Lothar, the image noise is not so bad that it cannot be reduced to an acceptable level. I don't expect a high-ISO action photo to have as little noise as a static subject, nor do I expect a depth of field from the front lens to the horizon. Unfortunately, the excessive JPEG compression prevents a suitable reworking. Irfanview reports 79% jpg quality, which is really very low and you can see this in the JPG blocks even in normal view without zooming in. --Smial 23:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo Smial, that may all be true. Nevertheless, I always get annoyed when I see how photographic junk is hyped up as a quality image and really successful, appealing photos are dismissed. My question whether the juror feels capable of taking a comparable picture is certainly justified. Certainly better things are possible today in terms of camera technology than what the image under discussion is based on. But in my opinion this should not be decisive for the evaluation of a photo. Best regards -- Spurzem 14:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Robert, do you think, that you could take a better photo of a comparable scene? This is a question I nearly always ask myself before declaring a photo that someone else took a failure. Best regards -- Spurzem 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Robert Flogaus-Faust. --MB-one 10:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined --Milseburg 14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)