Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 26 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Halterner Straße, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ice in a furrow at the edge of the field in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wedding avenue (during the storm Tristan) in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hermann Leeser School in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Werzer`s lake hotels and boathouse on Werzer promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lantern on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trunk of a platanus × hispanica on «Johannes Brahms Promenade», Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Access balcony of the Strandschlössl on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Houseboat", Hotel Astoria`s beach cafe, Johannes-Brahms-Promenade #10, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach of Bocagrande, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 01:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross at the Convent of Santa Cruz de la Popa, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 01:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaza Fernández de Madrid, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 01:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of José Fernández de Madrid, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 01:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House on Calle 39, Cartagena, Colombia --Bgag 01:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the building at 16 rue Fresque in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 00:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kobylá nad Vidnavkou (Jungferndorf), Czech Silesia - cemetery --Pudelek 20:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demonstration racing during motor show in Sokolniki Park (Moscow, Russia) --LexKurochkin 19:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine (1814) near Nittel. --Palauenc05 17:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine (1814) near Nittel. --Palauenc05 17:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Station of the Cross (1677) in Saarburg. --Palauenc05 17:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View into the scenery of the old town in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 20:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the border of the old town into the old town of Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View onto the bus stop near the old town in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deutschland, Erden an der Mosel, Hauptstraße 10 --Berthold Werner 14:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woodcarved, polichromed gilded putti with coat of arms. --Moroder 12:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. It's your coat of arms? :) --Tournasol7 12:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Résidence Saint-Michel, Boulevard Vauban 86, Lille, France --Velvet 07:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eggolsheim station seen from the makeshift overpass --Ermell 07:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road bridge Forchheimer Straße in Eggolsheim --Ermell 07:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock in the rock labyrinth in Eichig --Ermell 07:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eggolsheim railway station --Ermell 07:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 5 Rue du Bourguet in Najac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 24 Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R., Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ardea cinerea in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the building at 19 Rue Droite in Rieupeyroux, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the building at Hauptstraße 42 in Bensheim, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)~
-
- Nomination Jaflong Bangladesh (by Shahadat Rahman Shemul) --Nafiur Rahman 06:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, photos by non-members of Commons are per se ineligible for consideration for Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of Mustard Plant.jpg (by Jubair Bin Iqbal) --Nafiur Rahman 06:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 06:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hippeastrum The delicate beauty of the flower. Focus stack of 15
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hippeastrum The delicate beauty of the flower. Focus stack of 15
-
- Nomination View of Upper Bidwell Park in Chico, California, February 2021 --Frank Schulenburg 22:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 20:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bloom of almond trees (Prunus dulcis) near Chico, Butte County, California --Frank Schulenburg 22:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 20:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haliaeetus leucocephalus in Wunsiedel, Bavaria (Germany). -- Geoprofi Lars 15:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose So poor, it shouldn't be nominated --Charlesjsharp 22:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
*@Charlesjsharp: Charles, I'd hardly call that review or even feedback. I'm sure Lars would rather have you provide some constructive criticism even when denying his photo — how else will he learn? Lars, in this case, your primary subject is obstructed by a gate. There are severely overblown highlights as well as chromatic aberrations all over the image. The subject is not sharp (unfocused?) and details are heavily posterized (noise-reduction artifacts, perhaps). —GerifalteDelSabana 08:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diana of Versailles --Commonists 09:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the train station in Najac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Too bright IMO --Ermell 19:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination At Matarinkoski in Vantaa, Finland --Ximonic 22:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me, nice ambient atmosphere :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anna Berreiter (GER) at the FIL World Luge Championships Königssee 2021 --Sandro Halank 20:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Hôtel Milliarede in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 02:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please check the image. IMO it's unsharp or blurred at the top and there are halos too. --XRay 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Support Thank you. IMO OK now. :-) --XRay 10:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Aschaffenburg-Schweinheim, Marienstrasse 17, from 17th/18th century, demolished 2020 --KaiBorgeest 22:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Estadio Nuevo Arcángel in Córdoba, Spain --Kallerna 20:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Old farmhouse in Goerwang, Southern Bavaria --Christof46 19:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Onychogomphus uncatus (blue-eyed Hooktail) in Guadalajara (Spain). --Balles2601 18:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Front facade of the Lee-Mansfield House, a two-story wood structure in a Victorian Eclectic style in the old eastern section of Chico. --Frank Schulenburg 14:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Nice photo, but the right side verticals look slightly tilted CCW --LexKurochkin 15:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angel Island Ferry as seen from Tiburon. --Frank Schulenburg 14:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ramona Dutch barge on the Vaartsche Rijn in Utrecht (The Netherlands) --Trougnouf 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Albert 1st memorial and Marexhe bridge in Liège (Belgium) --Trougnouf 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Statue under Pont des Arches in Liège, Belgium --Trougnouf 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Exterior corridor of the Dolhain children preventorium (Belgium) --Trougnouf 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: National Flag Memorial (Monumento Nacional a la Bandera) --Ermell 08:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Eclectic house, Rue des Pyramides 18, Lille, France --Velvet 07:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Konvalia Botanical Preserve (Zhytomyr Oblast) Ukraine. By User:84Human84 --Luda.slominska 07:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ötscherbach and Schusterwand, Ötscher-Tormäuer natural reserve, Lower Austria. Photo by User:Haeferl. --Liberaler Humanist 05:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The former hammer mill Grabner-Hammer in Gaming-Altenreith, Lower Austria. Photo by User:Haeferl. --Liberaler Humanist 19:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Close above the bar; I like the name of the village :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of the Esplanade in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7 --Sebring12Hrs 18:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side portal and crucifixion group after restoration at Basilica St. Paulinus, Trier. --Palauenc05 16:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good enough for me. --Tournasol7 09:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arms museum Luigi Marzoli in the Castle of Brescia. --Moroder 09:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Installation of a new bike path at Avenida Insurgentes, Mexico City. By User:EneasMx --ProtoplasmaKid 07:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Why f/22? It could be sharper at f/11 or f/14. But IMO it could be good enough for QI, if the verticals are vertical and the magenta and green CAs were removed. --XRay 05:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Deep_Ellum_sidewalk_covered_with_snow_in_Dallas_snow_storm_2021.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Deep Ellum sidewalk covered with snow in Dallas snow storm 2021 --Matthew T Rader 19:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 19:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Just recently nominated and declined -- are you planning to re-nominate it repeatedly until you get the result you like? --A.Savin 02:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Already declined and no modification. --XRay 10:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC).
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --A.Savin 00:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Bank_of_America_in_Dallas_Snow_2021.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bank of America in Dallas Snow 2021 --Matthew T Rader 19:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 19:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Just recently nominated and declined -- are you planning to re-nominate it repeatedly until you get the result you like? --A.Savin 02:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Already declined and no modification. --XRay 10:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC).
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --A.Savin 00:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Trassem_Höhe_ü_M.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Benchmark of Königlich Preußische Landesaufnahme (202,441 m. above Normalnull) at the Saint Erasmus Church in Trassem, Germany.--Palauenc05 18:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The bottom right corner is blurred, sorry. --Саня Новиков 20:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The picture is crisp sharp. --Palauenc05 21:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Excellent photo. The lower right corner is not part of the subject and is of no importance. -- Ikan Kekek 03:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK for me --Isiwal 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support I do not see any problem --LexKurochkin 09:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support IMO OK. --XRay 10:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 22:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 12:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Lakshman_Jhula_Bridge_-_Hrishikesh_-_Uttarakhand_001.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lakshman Jhula Bridge - Hrishikesh - Uttarakhand--Vijay Barot 15:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Disagree, picture is to unsharp. --Geoprofi Lars 19:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough, visible CA --LexKurochkin 09:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 11:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Hamburg,_Truss_of_Niedernfelder_Bruecken.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hamburg, truss of old "Niedernfelder Bruecken" for railway. (demolished 2010) --KaiBorgeest 23:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Unsharp and low-resolution --Trougnouf 18:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree, 3.75 MPixel exceed the minimum requirement of 2 MPixel (and back in 2004 it was still a lot). --KaiBorgeest 21:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose But it's not sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 06:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough. A clear VIC for me, as the bridge no longer exists. --Milseburg 10:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
File:London_Market_Porter,_Borough,_SE1-20130714-RM-201327.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pub the Market Porter in Southwark --Ermell 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- SupportGood quality. --Berthold Werner 09:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- OpposeI disagree. Need chromatic aberration correction on the upper left roff --Wilfredor 12:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 20:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Fine for me. --Palauenc05 08:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 00:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Brushtail_Possum_with_baby_-_AndrewMercer_-_DSC10671.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Brushtail Possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) with baby. Brisbane, Australia --Bald white guy 07:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose adult's face blurred --Charlesjsharp 22:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That's fair looking at the photo now. Handheld shot in dark forest with long lens (hence high ISO). I was just happy finding them since they're nocturnal. :-) --Bald white guy 08:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support Considering the circumstances of the shot and the high resolution, it's acceptable for me. --Palauenc05 22:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- what circumstances? It's in a city park Palauenc05! Charlesjsharp 22:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Bald white guy talked about a "Handheld shot in dark forest with long lens". That sounds somewhat special, doesn't it? --Palauenc05 18:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral Overprocessed To me it looks more overprocessed than blurred, may I suggest to try reprocessing the original raw? --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Per LexKurochkin: There are some areas with unbalanced suppression of image noise. I tend to prefer to tolerate a bit more image noise if the high ISO setting is unavoidable. I find this mix of completely smoothed areas and those with "natural" noise very irritating. In every other aspect, I think the photo is really well done. --Smial 10:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It is to unsharp for me, especially the face of the bigger one --Geoprofi Lars 11:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above--Commonists 19:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 12:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Wood statue of Virgin Mary in church Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec --Wilfredor 20:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient DoF, just the face is in focus --Uoaei1 06:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree. Not only the face is in focus, all the main object (the wood sculture) is in focus. --Wilfredor 16:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Wilfredor: just a hint: Nominators are not supposed to vote in this process.
- Fixed Sorry, it was my mistake while editing. --LexKurochkin 10:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Wilfredor: just a hint: Nominators are not supposed to vote in this process.
- Comment The main object (the wood sculpture) is in focus upper the main figure waist, below it is partly blurred, but good enough for me. On the other hand I would suggest to categorize it more specifically and improve the description.
- Done --Wilfredor 02:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK. Thank you. --LexKurochkin 09:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please check (and improve) the filename. I don't think a filename beginning with "Photographs of" is a good name for a single photograph. --XRay 07:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 19:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina 09:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 12:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)