Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 20 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: Taipei Metro Wenshan Line. A train is moving from MuZha Station to Taipei Zoo Station --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: Taipei Metro Wenshan Line. A train is moving from MuZha Station to Taipei Zoo Station --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: Pilars of the Taipei Bridge --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Wow and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: Pilars of the Taipei Bridge --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Wow and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: A hawker offering his Sweet Potatoes in front of Shilin MRT Station --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: A hawker offering his Sweet Potatoes in front of Shilin MRT Station --Cccefalon 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Park Sentmaring, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Park Sentmaring, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tallinn aeroplane harbour hangars. (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 00:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Snow art, Kärdla (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 00:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 4 Market Square in Otmuchów --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination 4 Market Square in Otmuchów --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bell tower at the Basilica in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Common yellow swallow tail (Papilio machaon) butterfly. --Prosthetic Head 00:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ Ezarate 00:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Common yellow swallow tail (Papilio machaon) butterfly. --Prosthetic Head 00:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ Ezarate 00:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shell of an Onyx Slipper Snail, Crepidula onyx --Llez 23:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shell of an Onyx Slipper Snail, Crepidula onyx --Llez 23:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Forte Sao Mateo beach, Cabo Frio, Brazil --Ezarate 23:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Forte Sao Mateo beach, Cabo Frio, Brazil --Ezarate 23:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The DC Tower 1 in Vienna from the South on August 25, 2014. --Rftblr 20:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality (could be much sharper, though) --Shansov.net 20:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. Forgot the final sharpening step. Uploaded a sharpened version. --Rftblr 20:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The DC Tower 1 in Vienna from the South on August 25, 2014. --Rftblr 20:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality (could be much sharper, though) --Shansov.net 20:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
       Comment Thanks. Forgot the final sharpening step. Uploaded a sharpened version. --Rftblr 20:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Hochhaus Neue Donau ("High-rise New Danube") in Vienna from the South-West on August 25, 2014. --Rftblr 19:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good. --Ximonic 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Hochhaus Neue Donau ("High-rise New Danube") in Vienna from the South-West on August 25, 2014. --Rftblr 19:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good. --Ximonic 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Maras, Peru --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Maybe a little harsh light conditions though. --Ximonic 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Maras, Peru --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Maybe a little harsh light conditions though. --Ximonic 20:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Los Paredones, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Rftblr 21:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Los Paredones, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Rftblr 21:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chipiona Lighthouse, Spain --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion looks a little bit tilted CW --Shansov.net 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Chipiona Lighthouse, Spain --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion looks a little bit tilted CW --Shansov.net 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Poco a poco 20:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hermitage of Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Shansov.net 19:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hermitage of Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 19:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Shansov.net 19:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Rifugio Valeruz and the Crepa Neigrapeak in Val de Fascia --Moroder 18:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Rifugio Valeruz and the Crepa Neigrapeak in Val de Fascia --Moroder 18:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Grave “John Leppich” in the Jesuit Cemetery in the Park Sentmaring, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Grave “John Leppich” in the Jesuit Cemetery in the Park Sentmaring, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside cross near Osweiler, Luxembourg.--Palauenc05 17:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside cross near Osweiler, Luxembourg.--Palauenc05 17:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. A bird nest box on a birch tree --Dmitry Ivanov 17:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. May be portrait format could be better. --XRay 18:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. A bird nest box on a birch tree --Dmitry Ivanov 17:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. May be portrait format could be better. --XRay 18:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sunrise on the Famberhorst in the Netherlands. --Famberhorst 16:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sunrise on the Famberhorst in the Netherlands.
      --Famberhorst 16:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea. --Famberhorst 16:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
      --Famberhorst 16:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Little Egret standing in a tree. --Prosthetic Head 15:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Decline Unsharp --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Little Egret standing in a tree. --Prosthetic Head 15:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Unsharp --Jacek Halicki 17:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picture A of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picture A of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picture B of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picture B of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picture C of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picture C of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picture D of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ. --Palauenc05 17:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picture D of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ. --Palauenc05 17:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Picture E of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Picture E of chromalithographies of one of the stained glasses of the Cathedral of Chartres, 1867. Scan from the original Litho by --Hubertl 15:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination France, Nancy, Banque Charles Renauld --Berthold Werner 14:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination France, Nancy, Banque Charles Renauld --Berthold Werner 14:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Liparia splendens flower. --Prosthetic Head 13:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Liparia splendens flower. --Prosthetic Head 13:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Museumsplatz Wien 2016 --Ralf Roletschek 13:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion This shot has character! --Hubertl 23:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Museumsplatz Wien 2016 --Ralf Roletschek 13:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion This shot has character! --Hubertl 23:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Olsanestinden & Vassdalstindan in low light, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Olsanestinden & Vassdalstindan in low light, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Residential in Å i Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Residential in Å i Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cairn at Litlandstabben, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cairn at Litlandstabben, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 September --Ximonic 12:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Construction of Hiiumaa Gymnasium (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 12:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Decline Left side is blurred, probably needs cropping --Shansov.net 19:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Construction of Hiiumaa Gymnasium (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 12:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Left side is blurred, probably needs cropping --Shansov.net 19:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Zalophus californianus (California sea lion)the sea lion show in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Zalophus californianus (California sea lion)the sea lion show in the ZooParc de Beauval in Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, France. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination King Louie in The Jungle Book at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination King Louie in The Jungle Book at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Disney Character illustrating Pinocchio at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Disney Character illustrating Pinocchio at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 11:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Klaus-Peter Bachmann, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Klaus-Peter Bachmann, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Helmut Damnmann-Tamke, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Helmut Damnmann-Tamke, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Frauke Heiligenstadt, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Frauke Heiligenstadt, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Doris Schröder-Köpf, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support die Schöne Frau Schröder.--Jebulon 18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Doris Schröder-Köpf, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support die Schöne Frau Schröder.--Jebulon 18:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stephan Weil, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stephan Weil, member of the Landtag of Lower Saxony Olaf Kosinsky 11:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Aizkalne orthodox church, Aizkalne. By User:Normunds K --Papuass 11:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Decline Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 13:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Set to decline: Not eligible because declined January 29 and no changes since then. --Cccefalon 19:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Aizkalne orthodox church, Aizkalne. By User:Normunds K --Papuass 11:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Good quality. --Prosthetic Head 13:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
      Set to decline: Not eligible because declined January 29 and no changes since then. --Cccefalon 19:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Altar, Nīdermuiža. By User:Normunds K --Papuass 11:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Decline Wrong white balance, reddish CA, wrong focus --Cccefalon 19:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Altar, Nīdermuiža. By User:Normunds K --Papuass 11:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Wrong white balance, reddish CA, wrong focus --Cccefalon 19:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ancient greek marble pedestal/base with insciptions, Acropolis, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Slightly too bright IMO. --Ermell 13:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ancient greek marble pedestal/base with insciptions, Acropolis, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Slightly too bright IMO. --Ermell 13:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Temple of Athena Nike, Acropolis, Athens.--Jebulon 10:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Temple of Athena Nike, Acropolis, Athens.--Jebulon 10:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kylix with design of a (happy) silene riding a (happy) donkey. Ca.510 BCE, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kylix with design of a (happy) silene riding a (happy) donkey. Ca.510 BCE, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination An ancient greek kylix decorated with spirals, ca.1400 BCE. Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination An ancient greek kylix decorated with spirals, ca.1400 BCE. Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A terracotta bull-head shaped oil lamps, ancient greek art, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination A terracotta bull-head shaped oil lamps, ancient greek art, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 10:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dulan, Taitung County, Taiwan: The former Sugar Factory was converted into a cultural center --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dulan, Taitung County, Taiwan: The former Sugar Factory was converted into a cultural center --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Xingchang, Taitung County, Taiwan: Xingchang Presbyterian Church --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Xingchang, Taitung County, Taiwan: Xingchang Presbyterian Church --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Taroko Gorge, Hualien, Taiwan: Tianxiang Presbyterian Church (天祥基督教堂) --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Taroko Gorge, Hualien, Taiwan: Tianxiang Presbyterian Church (天祥基督教堂) --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Suao, Yilan, Taiwan: Railway turntable at Suao Railway Station --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Suao, Yilan, Taiwan: Railway turntable at Suao Railway Station --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Checheng Township, Taiwan: Checheng Elementary School --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Checheng Township, Taiwan: Checheng Elementary School --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Please remove the dust spot. Elsewhere good quality. --Cccefalon 09:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Please remove the dust spot. Elsewhere good quality. --Cccefalon 09:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Two dust spots, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 09:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Two dust spots, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 09:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
      Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Town hall in Otmuchów 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 3 Market Square in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination 3 Market Square in Otmuchów 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 3 Market Square in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination 3 Market Square in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Baptismal font in the Church of the Redeemer in Bamberg --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Baptismal font in the Church of the Redeemer in Bamberg --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Altar with crucifix in Erlöserkirche in Bamberg --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Altar with crucifix in Erlöserkirche in Bamberg --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Organ-Martinus Church Nankendorf --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Organ-Martinus Church Nankendorf --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Courtyard of the lower castle in Thurnau --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Courtyard of the lower castle in Thurnau --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Construction of Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Construction of Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 07:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Saint Michael and Saint Fyodor, Martyrs of Chernigov, Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Saint Michael and Saint Fyodor, Martyrs of Chernigov, Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia Building in Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia Building in Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Arbat Street in Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Arbat Street in Moscow --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Arbatskaya Station of Moscow Subway, pavilion --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Arbatskaya Station of Moscow Subway, pavilion --Florstein 07:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy). --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Restaurant Vista Linda near Parque Nacional Cajas, Ecuador --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Restaurant Vista Linda near Parque Nacional Cajas, Ecuador --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Theobroma cacao fruit, Ecuador --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Theobroma cacao fruit, Ecuador --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Still life with herbal salt and potatoes, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Still life with herbal salt and potatoes, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Eastern portal of the castle chapel, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Eastern portal of the castle chapel, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman tombstone showing Perseus and Andromeda, put into the outside wall near the apsis of the parish church Saints Michael and George in Moosburg, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman tombstone showing Perseus and Andromeda, put into the outside wall near the apsis of the parish church Saints Michael and George in Moosburg, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sunset in do Forte Beach, Brazil --Ezarate 00:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sunset in do Forte Beach, Brazil --Ezarate 00:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kuressaare (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 20:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kärdla harbour (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 20:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. English desrcription would be helpful. --Ermell 21:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Kruusamägi 12:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kärdla harbour (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 20:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. English desrcription would be helpful. --Ermell 21:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Kruusamägi 12:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kecharis, medieval monastic complex, in Armenia --Armenak Margarian 20:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kecharis, medieval monastic complex, in Armenia --Armenak Margarian 20:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination "Moskva" Hotel in Moscow --Florstein 07:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination "Moskva" Hotel in Moscow --Florstein 07:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Codex Egberti (980-993), fol. 13: Nativity of Jesus and the Annunciation to the shepherds. --Palauenc05 18:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC) * Decline Sorry, even without EXIF it is obvious, that this was taken with a low quality device. probably smartphone. The quality is not sufficient. --Cccefalon 20:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment The picture was not taken with a smartphone! But the famous book is displayed behind a thick glass panel. They didn't want to take it out for me. Considering the circumstances, the picture has quite a reasonable quality. --Palauenc05 21:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Even when an object is behind glass, it is possible to take it with a far better quality than presented here. I do not deny, that it is of encyclopedial value. But the quality is far behind the standards. Of course you can try to find supporters in CR. --Cccefalon 05:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment It will be quite hard to get a better shot of the book through the thick glass panel and in that showcase lighting. Actually, I have tried different possibilities. IMO the image is the best available until the showcase will be opened for photography. --Palauenc05 17:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Codex Egberti (980-993), fol. 13: Nativity of Jesus and the Annunciation to the shepherds. --Palauenc05 18:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Sorry, even without EXIF it is obvious, that this was taken with a low quality device. probably smartphone. The quality is not sufficient. --Cccefalon 20:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
       Comment The picture was not taken with a smartphone! But the famous book is displayed behind a thick glass panel. They didn't want to take it out for me. Considering the circumstances, the picture has quite a reasonable quality. --Palauenc05 21:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
      Even when an object is behind glass, it is possible to take it with a far better quality than presented here. I do not deny, that it is of encyclopedial value. But the quality is far behind the standards. Of course you can try to find supporters in CR. --Cccefalon 05:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
       Comment It will be quite hard to get a better shot of the book through the thick glass panel and in that showcase lighting. Actually, I have tried different possibilities. IMO the image is the best available until the showcase will be opened for photography. --Palauenc05 17:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Residential building Alsterkrugchaussee 475 in Hamburg-Fuhlsbüttel --Dirtsc 17:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Residential building Alsterkrugchaussee 475 in Hamburg-Fuhlsbüttel --Dirtsc 17:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 06:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Residential building Rütersbarg 39 in Hamburg-Lokstedt --Dirtsc 17:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn Although the composition is nice (except for the branches in the right upper corner, which should be cropped), the shadow half of the main subject, a brick house is riddled with noise and noise reduction that destroys the brick detail. --Rftblr 19:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I see the point, but I need some time to rework the image so I'll nominate a new version again. --Dirtsc 09:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Commercial building Mühlenhagen 143 in Hamburg-Rothenburgsort --Dirtsc 17:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn Too much noise reduction applied, overprocessed. Please re-develop from RAW --Shansov.net 18:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I see the point, but I need some time to rework the image so I'll nominate a new version again. --Dirtsc 09:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Commercial building Mühlenhagen 143 in Hamburg-Rothenburgsort --Dirtsc 17:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn Too much noise reduction applied, overprocessed. Please re-develop from RAW --Shansov.net 18:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I see the point, but I need some time to rework the image so I'll nominate a new version again. --Dirtsc 09:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Goat heads in various stages of decay --Uoaei1 09:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Goat heads in various stages of decay --Uoaei1 09:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Metro_MSK_Line3_Smolenskaya_(img2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Smolenskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 09:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Michael Barera 05:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I said that I won't decline your subway photos anymore, but sometimes just can't pass along. This photo is absolutely not sharp and cannot be QI. It's useful, has good composition, but just not QI because of sharpness. I understand that it's a defect in your lens, but it's not a reason to promote blurry picture as QI. Not every picture has to be QI even if it's useful. Sorry about that. --Shansov.net 16:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
@Shansov.net: люблю вас! Просто не мог пройти мимо такой вопиющей несправедливости, да. :) И спасибо за фотку "Красных Ворот". Вы таки сумели доказать, что в условиях плохой освещённости профессиональная камера за 3,5 тыс. евро (с соответствующей оптикой) снимет гораздо чётче на высоких ИСО, чем любительская камера за 700 евро. За это вам большое спасибо. Напрашивается вывод: статус QI могут получать лишь снимки, снятые на Canon EOS 1D X и иже с ним, да? Или есть иные мерила качества, без денежной цены делений? Ведь отчего-то в плане композиции, цветового баланса, света и теней, хроматических аберраций EOS 1D X далеко не всегда спасает, не так ли? Несправедливость, всюду несправедливость! --Florstein 07:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Florstein: , да что ж такое :) Я ради интереса выбрал станцию с самой некачественной фоткой и попробовал снять, причём эта станция заметно темнее. И на QI я её не выдвигаю, обратите внимание, однако вот вы посчитали сравнение нечестным из-за цены камеры... Ну что ж, могу попробовать снять что-то и на дешёвую камеру, т.к. в моём представлении это не менее возможно (только не уверен, что найду дешевый широкоугольник, свою сигму 10-20 продал давно). Но это в любом случае не влияет на критерии отбора QI. --Shansov.net 16:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Shansov.net: ну и хорошо, что сняли эту станцию. Я ж не этим вас попрекаю. Качество того снимка, обусловленное классом камеры, очень хорошее. Почему бы и не выдвинуть на QI, там ведь даже нет ХА, пересвета и отклонений в балансе белого в синеву или мадженту, как на многих других ваших снимках, которые вы всё же выставляли на QIC. Фотограф-профессионал (к коим мы с вами явно не относимся) может снять шедевр и на камеру мобильного телефона, но вовсе не стоит глядеть на эту фотку в полном разрешении. И, как видите, со мной согласны многие. Что касается "двойных стандартов", то в вашем исполнении эта фраза меня отчего-то смешит. :) --Florstein 17:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Florstein: в моём понимании как раз в полном разрешении и надо смотреть кандидатов на QI, иначе смысла нет, или надо тогда задавать конкретный размер в мегапикселях, при уменьшении до которого следует рассматривать фото (только вот беда - ХА тогда видно не будет). Отклонениям в балансе белого я обычно значения не придаю, но любопытно, где у меня пересвет и ХА на многих моих QI, которых у меня всего 18? :) --Shansov.net 18:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Shansov.net: Да, ваш фотовклад пока невелик, прошу прощения. Вы, наверное, просто не успели номинировать снимки, которые я видел. :) Как бы то ни было, я в упор не понимаю, зачем таскать с собой двухкилограммовую дуру, чтобы на выходе получать то, что получается у вас. Хотя, я бы даже не помыслил затеять с вами диалог, если бы услышал от вас вначале эту фразу про "балансу белого значения не придаю", посчитав вас троллем-пустышкой. И по всему выходит, что слова про "полное разрешение" есть пустой трёп, ибо вы, ничтоже сумняшеся, номинировали 5 мегапиксельные фото, снятые 19МП камерой. Так что, я тоже непременно когда-нибудь переноминирую те фотки метро, что были забракованы в том числе и вами, уменьшив их размер до 5МП и придав им тем самым замечательную чёткость. Милости просим критиковать! --Florstein 18:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Florstein: ну вот вы начали мерять других по себе. Что значит "просто не успел номинировать"? Я не номинировал и не собираюсь номинировать то, что мне самому не нравится или не кажется качественным, в отличие от вас - как я понял, вы считаете, что все ваши снимки должны быть QI, верно? Мой приоритет - загрузка полезных изображений и я периодически закачиваю и не слишком качественные изображения, если вижу, что они были бы полезны для иллюстрации в статью. Двухкилограммовый аппарат я таскаю потому, что мне требуется иметь гарантированную возможность получить снимок в любых условиях освещения, в которых я сам что-то вижу. Так-то я и вас могу спросить - зачем вы таскаете с собой целую зеркалку, если такие мутные и шумные фотографии можно снять и компактной мыльницей :) Как-то вы всё же излишне активно реагируете: я пишу, что фотография нечёткая, а вы мне - "вы не фотограф-профессионал", "у вас все фотографии плохие", "вы судите по двойным стандартам", "у вас на многих фотографиях плохой баланс белого и ХА", "у вас слишком дорогая камера". Да при чём тут мои фотографии вообще? От того, что вы мои работы критикуете ваше фото не станет более чётким. --Shansov.net 19:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
@Shansov.net: и правда не стало чётче. А я так надеялся. Если честно, я просто иногда не могу пройти мимо, когда замечаю лицемерие, маскирующееся под справедливость, и ту самую "политику двойных стандартов". --Florstein 19:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not perfect but OK for QI. There are other photos of very, very poor quality, that got promoted (including those supported by "Shansov.net"). Well, some people apparently think that only photos from high-end fullframes can be QI and any photo taken with a high-end fullframe is QI per definitionem. This is just - wrong. We have users with point-and-shoot cameras and top quality photographs, and we have users with >10,000$ equipment who mostly produce rubbish; just to name some extreme cases. In fact, the price of the camera is just one of numerous determinants for the quality and/or valuability of a particular photo. Same for the price of the lens. And none of these determinants must be essential in the end. Now, unfortunately, the Russian WM chapter does not care about photographs whatsoever, and so it does not give expensive toys to their activists (like e.g. the Austrian one does). Maybe photos from Russia then should not be QI at all? OK, but then please same quality standards for all, so declining poor quality images from Russia as well as from any other country ;-) --A.Savin 11:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Camera and lens prices are not important for QI, only image quality is relevant. Even if someone will post blurry picture taken with medium format it shouldn't be promoted. I still don't get the double standards that you and other reviewers are applying here: many photos are declined for barely noticeable CA at 100% size or slight posterization, but those completely unsharp pictures of easily accessible object are promoted. --Shansov.net 16:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not perfect but OK for QI --Christian Ferrer 12:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_February_20_2016&oldid=524648463"