Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Saint Gregory the Illuminator Cathedral. Yerevan, Armenia. --Halavar 01:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Gregory the Illuminator Cathedral. Yerevan, Armenia. --Halavar 01:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Benoa, Bali, Indonesia: Fish trawlers in the harbour of Benoa --Cccefalon 01:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lateral left chapel of the Cathedral of Amelia --Livioandronico2013 20:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good I think.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building of the Salins de Frontignan --Christian Ferrer 20:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good I think. --Hockei 20:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gelendzhik --Alexxx1979 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support For me quite good. Beautiful sky and clouds. --Hockei 20:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kleiner Blaupfeil - Orthetrum coerulescens, Männchen (male) --Hockei 20:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco of the Cathedral of Amelia --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Miocene gastropod, Turritella semisulcata --Llez 20:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Organ, cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hill of Crosses, Lithuania --Poco a poco 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swan (Cygnus olor) at the Nymphenburg Palace, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female european rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes nasicornis), Calatayud, Aragon, Spain --Poco a poco 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway station, Villafeliche, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 20:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock formations near Exomytis, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hockei 20:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Rock cut tomb near Exomytis, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Thera, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Chemin de Saint-Clair (street). Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 19:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination decorative object indicating the 8th February 0x010C 19:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Too shallow DoF, bottom crop unfortunate, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 20:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MASPE --The Photographer 17:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Halavar 19:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Student of Yogyakarta State University during a Chinese-Indonesian fusion fashion show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta.Crisco 1492 15:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Intern of Church of San Francesco in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 14:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Well in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 14:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, assumin the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 20:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chris Harms of Lord of the Lost at Amphi Festival 2014 --Achim Raschka 14:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corvus Corax at Amphi Festival 2014 --Achim Raschka 14:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Atatürk, Kayseri, Turkey --Bgag 14:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Celestine and Sulfur by User:Parent Géry. --Ram-Man 14:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crusher at Löten gravel pit, Ekerö (Stockholm county). --ArildV 12:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave column in Bortfeld. --Hydro 11:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
SupportGood quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sir Alec Guinness. By User:Allan warren --Nonexyst 11:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Good portrait but it lacks sharpness IMHO, not a QI, sorry --Poco a poco 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Information board on the Church of the assumption of Holy Virgin Mary in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Halavar 10:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Barbara church in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Persian cyclamen (Cyclamen persicum). Adana, Turkey --Zcebeci 07:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waves at Bamburgh. Mattbuck 07:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 07:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Path in Greenwich Park, London --Daniel Case 06:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Habib Koité (Mali), appearance at the 39th music festival "Bardentreffen" 2014 in Nuremberg, Germany. By User:Rs-foto --Achim Raschka 05:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Smial 08:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loosely translated: Frosted breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.
Famberhorst 05:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. Good composition. --XRay 05:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Loosely translated: Frosted breathing roots (pneumatoforen) a cypress (Taxodium distichum) in the Famberhorst.
-
- Nomination Narcissus papyraceus 'Paperwhite'. A fragrant white narcissus.
Famberhorst 05:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. I would crop out a part at the top. --XRay 05:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Correctie gewas.--Famberhorst 07:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Narcissus papyraceus 'Paperwhite'. A fragrant white narcissus.
-
- Nomination Otto-Mann-Haus at the harbor, Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic winged altar, Maria Gail, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 08:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar for Saint Anne, Maria Gail, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Epitaph of the Grotta von Grottenegg, Maria Gail, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Euphorbia in Hyderabad, India --Nikhilb239 04:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry but Insufficient quality due to noisy background and unsharpness at top of flowers. --Zcebeci 07:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Azurite --Ram-Man 03:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main bronze door - Cathedral of Monreale --Jbribeiro1 02:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window at Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna --Hubertl 01:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Joseph Johann von Littrow, Balneologist - Bust in the Aula of the Academy of Sciences, Vienna --Hubertl 01:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment There is anything that appears to be a dustspot --Ezarate 01:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC) *
Done thanks for review!--Hubertl 06:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Support now is ok Ezarate 11:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Nomination Joseph Johann von Littrow, Balneologist - Bust in the Aula of the Academy of Sciences, Vienna --Hubertl 01:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Lagoa da Conceicao, Florianopolis, Brazil --Ezarate 01:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)*
Comment tilted ccw. Please check.--Hubertl 18:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Done thanks!!! Ezarate 19:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. its "nearly" straight. --Hubertl 21:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC) --Hubertl 21:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Lagoa da Conceicao, Florianopolis, Brazil --Ezarate 01:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)*
-
- Nomination Main Square of Neumarkt im Hausruckkreis (Upper Austria) --Isiwal 22:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bent pyramid in Dahshur, Egypt --Oltau 19:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Severe haloing issues. --Crisco 1492 15:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red pyramid in Dahshur, Egypt --Oltau 19:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Severe haloing issues. --Crisco 1492 15:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Wikimedian during GLAMcamp London. By User:Christoph Braun --1989 01:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Below portrait shot standard, it only is acceptable when viewing in small size, as soon as you watch higher resolution, the ISO 1600 grain is predominant and the details are lost. --Cccefalon 02:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snösätra is a an old industrial area from the fifties outside Stockholm. --ArildV 10:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)*
Comment the right side is leaning in, QI for me after repair.--Hubertl 10:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Done also less dark. thank you.--ArildV 08:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Snösätra is a an old industrial area from the fifties outside Stockholm. --ArildV 10:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)*
-
- Nomination Lake Windermere. Mattbuck 10:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Darkness is expected for such an overcast day. QI. --Crisco 1492 16:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snösätra is a an old industrial area from the fifties outside Stockholm. The area (with permission from several property owners) has become a centre for street art. --ArildV 14:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Too dark, would also benefit from a cut at the bottom imo --Moroder 17:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Donex2. Thank you --ArildV 08:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Snösätra is a an old industrial area from the fifties outside Stockholm. The area (with permission from several property owners) has become a centre for street art. --ArildV 14:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kleiner Blaupfeil - Orthetrum coerulescens, Männchen (male) --Hockei 16:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant Schweizerhaus on Kreuzbergl, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Full double rainbow --F. Riedelio 08:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Nice image, but IMO oversaturated. The roof of the house is very red. --XRay 06:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dried tendrils of a vine around the vineyard wire --F. Riedelio 08:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oversharpened Poco a poco 21:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Nice detail; sky is a little noisy but not too bad --Daniel Case 07:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Dried tendrils of a vine around the vineyard wire --F. Riedelio 08:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Housing of a snail --F. Riedelio 08:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Lykhny, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp; CA in leaves --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Lake Ritsa from the south-west. Ritsa Relict National Park, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Nice scene, but too unsharp in too many places --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination pipe organ in Sankt Botvids kyrka (church). --ArildV 13:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good detail; striking composition --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Strasbourg --Billy69150 11:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs perspewctive correction (verticals are leaning in). what about a tighter crop to focus on the vehicle? --Cccefalon 01:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Je ne suis pas d'accord concernant un cadrage plus serré du véhicule car le but ici est de montrer le véhicule dans son environnement urbain, pas uniquement le modèle. --Billy69150 17:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. Pas de problème - le cadrage était juste une suggestion, aucune erreur. --Cccefalon 01:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Giant figure in Palma de Mallorca --F. Riedelio 10:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good detail; nice tight focus on the subject --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crucifix of the cathedralin Sutri --Livioandronico2013 08:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline A little too unsharp ... perhaps it would have worked at f/8? --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall/Office building, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Blown lights at center, noisy sky, lens flare at edges --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monastery Sankt Georgen, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 07 February 2015 (UTC)
Please sharpen the monastery and reduce blue shadows. Mattbuck 23:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Comment IMHO white balance is off to the blue. --C messier 14:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Not done --Mattbuck 21:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Monastery Sankt Georgen, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 07 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church of Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 06 February 2015 (UTC)
Tilted anticlockwise. Mattbuck 23:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC) - Decline
Not done --Mattbuck 21:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Parish church of Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 06 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination PCAPH vs CERN CC - 20140911 - batting --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Needs sharpening. Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC) - Decline Agree with Matt B. --Crisco 1492 16:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination PCAPH vs CERN CC - 20140911 - batting --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination USO-RCT - 20141003 - Plaquage --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Bit dark and rather noisy. Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC) - Decline Agree with Matt B. --Crisco 1492 16:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination USO-RCT - 20141003 - Plaquage --Pleclown 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Hainfelder_Hütte_Panorama_Ost_01.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Panorama from Hainfeld Hut (Lower Austria) eastwards --Uoaei1 23:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment I love the scenery & composition but there's this massive painting effect over the entire image that one can see on all the vegetation except those in the foreground near the bottom of the image. -- KTC 00:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support There are some areas showing minor blur (I pointed out one) but for a single shot at the resolution given, this is neglectible (a prime instead of a megazoom might have done better here). For a higher level of detail you need a stitched panoramic. --Kreuzschnabel 06:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Info This is my very first experiment with stitching, my D7100 has just a resolution of 6000x4000! The original images can be found here: left part and right part.
Question What could I do better here with stitching, or maybe with sharpening? I guess the deficiencies you mention are already in the originals. --Uoaei1 10:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- All right, so I am mistaken assuming it was a single shot :-) I don’t see actual stitching errors (yet haven’t looked too hard for them), so well done. The blurry areas mostly come from lenses getting a bit blurred towards the edges (and worse, corners). Always make sure to have ample overlapping (half the frame is not too much) between adjacent frames, so the stitching software has got enough sharp material to pick. Maybe you ought to test your lens for an aperture setting giving most overall sharpness. --Kreuzschnabel 11:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support --Hubertl 00:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Very good quality. --Steindy 22:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 15:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Klagenfurt Lendkanal Wasserspiegelung 07102008 1113.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Water reflection on the water surface of the Lendkanal, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
-PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Oppose Very nice but too posterized.-
Support A successful experiment. Therefore, the water is something surreal in motion and mirroring. The sharpness is impeccable. --Steindy 00:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
-- Smial 05:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Oppose Noisy, oversaturated, oversharpened.
Oppose Nice idea but saturation and (worse) sharpness are overdone, the image is full of sharpening artifacts (white linings around dark objects). Will support after rework. --Kreuzschnabel 07:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support The foliage reflection in the bottom half is still a bit grainy but all in all QI now for me. --Kreuzschnabel 11:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Weak
Support as for Kreuzschnabel. Vote changed. -- Smial 14:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support OK It's better--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support --Hubertl 21:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 15:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:ColognePride_2014_-_Heumarkt_1655_-_Horse_McDonald-2192.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Performance of Horse McDonald on the street festival of the ColognePride. By User:Raymond --Achim Raschka 13:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Great. --Smial 15:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Heavy CAs on the sholders and the arms. --Steindy 00:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Dearest Steindy, CA is a lens error, not an effect caused by blue LED spotlights. --Smial 05:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Poor microphone but good quality. Minor motion blur is inavoidable in this light. --Kreuzschnabel 06:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 15:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Stepping_Stones_Swale_Healaugh.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Stepping Stones crossing the Swale river, North Yorkshire --Kreuzschnabel 16:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good composition and QI -- Spurzem 16:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry Spurzem. The blurred grasses and branches interferes. This is not a QI IMO. --Steindy 00:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment To your information: There was a very narrow gap in the shrubbery to take this picture. A few inches to the left there was another bush interfering. It took me some minutes to find a suitable viewpoint to get most of the stepstone bridge into the frame, so I decided for a DoF that would leave them blurred so they wouldn’t interfere too much. And I’m not sure I’m allowed to cut some of the branches off in a national park :-) --Kreuzschnabel 07:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Kreuzschnabel, you do not need to „inform“ me. I know these problems very well and often has to make compromises. But I would not say the contrary, that it is a QI. But they've got to get their consents, therefore they rejoice at it. Regards --Steindy 23:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good use of DOF. -- Smial 05:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 15:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Swaledale-footpath-Muker-Thwaite.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Public footpath from Muker towards Thwaite, upper Swaledale --Kreuzschnabel 17:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose the unsharp wall in the foreground is disturbing for me. The wall in the center is sharp. Was this intended? Second opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 19:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Certainly it’s intended. The foreground wall is clearly part of the composition, leading the eye in the direction of the path. To get it sharp, I would have had to stop down at least to f/16, blurring the rest of the image by diffraction. I even find it nicer that way because it adds some depth to the image. Well, if you want a second opinion (I don’t know why, but anyway), let’s go to CR, but, generally asking, if you can’t make up your mind about a nomination, why do you say anything at all? This is not a photography workshop to discuss image compositions. --Kreuzschnabel 08:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment I find it unfavorable, that the wall in the foreground is unsharp. That makes absolutely no sense for me, because it is pretty dominant for the composition.--Hubertl 08:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Support a wider view (at left) would have been better IMO, however QI --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose As Hubertl. --Steindy 01:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Obvisiously perfectly meeting QI criteria. -- Smial 05:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support --Livioandronico2013 20:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 15:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Crab spider 07040.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Crab spider --Vengolis 03:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Question, maybe a small crop to get rid of the upper-left brown whatever, or better a bold crop with far less black background? –Be..anyone 01:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Review
Support Probably ok. Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the head / eyes (upper parts of the body(?)) are out of focus and imo it is overexposed. --Hockei 19:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
YES.Not the best.Thank you :) --Vengolis 01:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days Apparently withdrawn. --C messier 15:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:Feldberg_-_Jumping_Snowboarder9.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Jumping snowboarder at Feldberg, Germany --Taxiarchos228 11:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 12:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality --Billy69150 12:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose It could be great but unfortunately it is out of focus (which is on the branches in the foreground). --Kadellar 16:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Kadellar, sorry --Kreuzschnabel 07:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Kadellar --XRay 13:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Out of focus --Σπάρτακος 22:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 01:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Declined --Steindy 00:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:2012_05_27_062_Irokesenschnitt.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Blue mohawk haircut --F. Riedelio 10:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- weak
Support Too many Unsharp areas, please see my note--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for the review. It is an intentional blur, so that the subject (blue mohawk haircut) better comes into its own. --F. Riedelio 18:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment OK, to see by discussing--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Weak oppose The blurred foreground is OK of course but the mohawk man is not really sharp either, there’s some (motion?) blur on his head, and visible oversharpening on the collar/neck line. I’d excuse this on a 16 mpix image but at 4 mpix it’s too unsharp IMHO --Kreuzschnabel 07:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose The motif is the blue hair. So the person in the foreground is disturbing. --XRay 16:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Per XRay Poco a poco 12:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Steindy 00:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:2015-01-31_21-20-14_catch-belfort.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Angel's Bombita (in black and white) and Miss Agathe. --ComputerHotline 19:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. Red eyes, flat lighting by direct flash. --Smial 08:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Will support as soon as the red eyes are fixed. Flash reflections are unfavourable but not too bad here IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 10:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality, eyes are not so red. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment It’s very easy to fix them, I don’t see why it shouldn’t be done before promotion. --Kreuzschnabel 06:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Good sharpness but the red eyes are a no go. --Steindy 01:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined not done --C messier 15:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:2014_Reliktowy_Park_Narodowy_Rica,_Widok_na_jezioro_Rica_od_strony_południowo-zachodniej_(01).jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of the Lake Ritsa from the south-west. Ritsa Relict National Park, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 21:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing really sharp, lacks contrast. --Mattbuck 00:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Not really sharp, too hazy, perspective issues, sorry.--XRay 13:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Nice mountains, but image is not sharp. --Shansov.net 02:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Steindy 00:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Columbia-Lycoming County line 1.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Columbia/Lycoming County line. Jakec 03:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not that good --Billy69150 12:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
I'd prefer a reason based on the image guidelines, not personal taste. Thanks. Jakec 15:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Support, though it could probably do with being less red. Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Considerable
chromatic aberration (the road ahead showing blue and red brinks even in the preview), oversharpened (white seams around any dark detail) --Kreuzschnabel 06:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Oversharpened --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --C messier 14:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:20140705-TFF-Rudolstadt-RUTH-Verleihung-Liloba-5552.jpg
[edit]- Nomination RUTH winners Liloba at TFF-Rudolstadt 2014. By User:Carstor --Achim Raschka 09:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Support There are some lacks in sharpness, but overall QI --Hubertl 20:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose I think the left half would be QI, but the woman is too blurry. --Mattbuck 21:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Mattbuck. --XRay 16:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Declined --Steindy 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Beeston MMB 86.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Snow in Beeston. Mattbuck 09:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Support --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree, partly too dark --Hubertl 15:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose --Dnalor 01 16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose per Hubertl --Palauenc05 17:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- I already brightened it, low sun in winter creates fairly dark shadows. Mattbuck 22:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Too low DOF in the middle. The roof is not so sharp like beside. --Steindy 01:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Support acceptably sharp and brightness is OK. --C messier 15:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose a shadow image. Not QI for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Declined --C messier 14:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Avonmouth railway station MMB 25 150261.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 150261 at Avonmouth. Mattbuck 07:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)*
Comment a simple automatic tonality curve correction makes it a great picture! --Hubertl 16:29, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment. I can't imagine that it is fixable. The upper part of the building is overexposed and the lower part is too dark as well as the train. For me
Oppose. -- Spurzem 13:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Support I disagree, because I already fixed it at my computer. It looks surprisingly good! But Mattbuck should do it.--Hubertl 18:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
I had a go but it didn't seem to go well. Please upload your version. Mattbuck 22:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Done please review Mattbuck, if you don´t like it, revert it!--Hubertl 23:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I do like it, but what did you mean by "more depth" in your upload comments? Mattbuck 10:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- It´s probably a translation problem: I didn´t wrote "more depth" I wrote: "decreasing depth". In this case it means decreasing/reducing the dark areas. --Hubertl 12:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, Contrast. Mattbuck 14:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not really. Contrast changing (I always try to avoid it) increases the dark and raises the light at the same time. What I did, was reducing the dark areas except black, but keeping the lights. Decreasing black makes every picture flat.--Hubertl 22:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, Contrast. Mattbuck 14:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- It´s probably a translation problem: I didn´t wrote "more depth" I wrote: "decreasing depth". In this case it means decreasing/reducing the dark areas. --Hubertl 12:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Not a QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Code 09:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Good image. --Shansov.net 03:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Per Spurzem --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Support It's ok to me. -- DerFussi 09:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Support Minor CA on the outmost edges but all in all Hubertl’s version complies well with image guidelines. (Question still unsolved whether Hubertl is still entitled to vote.) --Kreuzschnabel 11:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Promoted --C messier 14:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)