Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 18 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Castle chapel "Töltschach" (owner: family Toff) in Töltschach, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern view of castle "Töltschach" (owner: family Toff) in Töltschach, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Meiselberg, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms of the noble family Hanau-Schaumburg at the northwestern gate of castle Meiselberg, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Michael on the Zollfeld, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hitaua Bay in Tory Channel, Marlborough Region, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Lawrence churches of Vieillevie, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance to the chapel of Notre-Dame de la Nativité in Grand-Vabre, commune de Conques-en-Rouergue, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 01:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sesriem Canyon, Sossusvlei, Namibia --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pond in the dunes of Amrum --Milseburg 18:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 10 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920). --Palauenc05 16:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920). --Palauenc05 16:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waldhausen vertically from above--Dktue 14:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Fine! --Palauenc05 15:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Kiel (1918). --Palauenc05 11:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 11:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cours Lafayette vers l'Est - au fond la cheminée de la chaufferie de La Part-Dieu. --Benoît Prieur 10:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice compo but I'm afraid that technical quality is not there --Podzemnik 10:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Relic of St. Valentine in the church of Santa Maria in Cosmedin, Rome. Photo by Dnalor 01, Vanneau Asocial 10:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A bit small but no wonder for 12 years old picture. Good quality, please add English description next time and geocode if possible --Podzemnik 11:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Des dolmas arméniens au restaurant André Melkonyan (Lyon) ; plutôt d'une tradition culinaire de la diaspora ; ce qui est appelé "dolmas" en Arménie correspond en général aux feuilles de vigne (sarmas). --Benoît Prieur 09:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Not the most flattering light but sufficient quality --MB-one 09:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West side of the Erlöserkirche in Bamberg --Ermell 08:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Hamburg (1921). --Palauenc05 08:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Pretty stuff --Podzemnik 10:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Germany, Greimerath, Oberdorf --Berthold Werner 07:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Děčín-CZ, church: kostel svatého Václava a Blažeje --Michielverbeek 06:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Děčín-CZ, central square: Masarykovo náměstí --Michielverbeek 06:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kapelle St. Jakob/Caplutta Sogn Giacun. Breil-Brigels. Painting in the chapel. (Ecce Homo).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Kapelle St. Jakob/Caplutta Sogn Giacun. Breil-Brigels. Painting in the chapel. (Ecce Homo).
-
- Nomination 260 Clyde Street facade, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 266-268 Clyde Street, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 266-268 Clyde Street, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Andrew's Cathedral and Italian Cloister Garden, Glasgow --Podzemnik 05:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bregenz Forest Railway with steam locomotive U25 Bezau at Schwarzenberg station, Vorarlberg, Austria --Uoaei1 05:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Candles at Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake George, California. --King of Hearts 03:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mono Lake, California. --King of Hearts 03:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Grevesmühlen (1923) --Palauenc05 22:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial to those who were executed or imprisoned at the Nazi "Peoples Court of Justice" --Martinvl 21:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross 19th century in Longuich, Germany.--Palauenc05 16:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Shame about the branch left. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment I can easily get rid of the branch, but that silly car in the background annoys me more. --Palauenc05 17:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You can not drive that car from the photo. (just kidding)--Famberhorst 17:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Info Just for the fun of it, please look again. (As if I had nothing else to do.) ;-) --Palauenc05 22:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Good job! Cap off.--Famberhorst 06:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Portail du cimetière de Jujurieux (Ain, France). --Benoît Prieur 21:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asbad (windmills) in Sistan, Iran (By User:Dolphinphoto5d) --Hanooz 03:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Review Comment - Even for a drone picture, it seems pretty noisy, and it's also kind of small. Can you de-noise the photo a fair amount? -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I made a request for noise reduction. --Hanooz 06:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenement house, 8 Fryštátská Street, Fryštát. Karviná, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
There's a CA on the roof edge. Apart from that good. --MB-one 14:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 21:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Cold_cheesecake_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cold cheesecake. --Tournasol7 00:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC) - Oppose I disagree. Unfortunate lighting and composition. Reflections and hard shadows by flash. --Smial 11:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Close-up of a slice of cake in the center of the image, I really don't see any problem of composition here. Not the best light for sure, but in interior very detailed subject IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, if "good composition" means that objects should be centered and nothing is truncated, then we can remove the criterion "composition" completely from the criteria catalog for QI. This photo may be sufficient in its technical quality (noise, sharpness, white balance), but in its lighting and framing it only equals a random snapshot with a mobile phone, and it is an insult to many other commons photographers, who try hard to adequately depict food. --Smial 10:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry but it's not candidate for FP. And it's not random composition; the wood in the background, nothing disturb, just chasecake in the foreground. Tournasol7 15:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- ok, I understand that burnt higklights, funny reflections and hard shadows when depicting faces or insects or artwork are a reason to decline, while images of food with the same faults are QI. Lesson learnt. --Smial 18:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry but it's not candidate for FP. And it's not random composition; the wood in the background, nothing disturb, just chasecake in the foreground. Tournasol7 15:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, if "good composition" means that objects should be centered and nothing is truncated, then we can remove the criterion "composition" completely from the criteria catalog for QI. This photo may be sufficient in its technical quality (noise, sharpness, white balance), but in its lighting and framing it only equals a random snapshot with a mobile phone, and it is an insult to many other commons photographers, who try hard to adequately depict food. --Smial 10:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support minor reflections, but well exposed and super sharp. --MB-one 10:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Smial.--Fischer.H 17:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - The subject is quite clear, and that's all that IMO really matters in this case. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 10:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Tombe_du_compositeur_Jules_Ward_au_cimetière_de_Jujurieux_(France).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tombe du compositeur Jules Ward au cimetière de Jujurieux (France). --Benoît Prieur 13:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Didn't think that I would ever promote a picture made with a phone. The sky is overexposed with a color shift, but this is not too disturbing with this subject. Surprised that the typical in-cell-phone processing artifacts are not present here. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Sharpness isn't the best ... --XRay 16:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Blown hightlights in the sky. --Ermell 17:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support - IMO, the tombstone is sharp enough and the sky isn't that bad or really distracting, unless you focus on the somewhat blown section intentionally. -- Ikan Kekek 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry per XRay --Paris Orlando 18:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose to many unsharp areas.--Fischer.H 10:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 10:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)