Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 17 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Office building LVM 1, LVM insurance, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Staggering. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the sculpture “Body and Soul” (Duk-Kyu Ryang, 2015) in front of the office building of the LVM, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Stunning. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Khevenhueller gate #07 at castle Hochosterwitz, Klagenfurt, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 04:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Henk Fortuin-NL , farmer-house de Buiswoning in Maassluis-NL --Michielverbeek 23:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Engine Pusher Pernilla moved with mud-filled.
--Famberhorst 18:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Engine Pusher Pernilla moved with mud-filled.
-
- Nomination Christian Hartmann (CDU). By User:Jenny Paul --Sandro Halank 18:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Oversharpened. Might work for a building, but not for a human portrait. IMHO. --A.Savin 04:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jameh Mosque, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 18:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 04:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malek mosque, Kerman, Iran --Poco a poco 18:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agha Bozorg mosque, Kashan, Iran --Poco a poco 18:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kamppi Center, Helsinki, Finland. Opened 2006. By User:Mahlum --Msaynevirta 13:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Halos, oversharpened, DoF too small, resolution too small. I think it is not improveable. --XRay 17:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: St.Lazarus Church --A.Savin 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: view of the sea promenade --A.Savin 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful, probably soft for FP but very good for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 12:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: CYTA phone booth --A.Savin 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: departure area of the airport --A.Savin 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent IMO. Good FP candidate? Not sure, maybe. I would probably vote for it and just might nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 12:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: tourist information building --A.Savin 11:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Koi carp in the pond of the Shibarikyū-Park in Tokyo --Ermell 10:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be a bit sharper, perhaps, and there may be some posterization of the whitish shade on top of the fish's mouth. However, the details of the fish's face in this closeup and the overall artistic composition make this a good picture and a QI for me. Anyone should feel free to disagree with me and take this to CR if you like, but I support. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building with church festaal and cafe of the district hospital Kutzenberg --Ermell 10:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crucifix on the site of the Kutzenberg district hospital --Ermell 10:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of St. Roch in Stara Łomnica --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lower Manor in Stara Łomnica 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lower Manor in Stara Łomnica 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Upper Manor in Stara Łomnica --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 11:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, porch --Jacek Halicki 09:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gibraltar, Gibraltar Barbary Macaques --Berthold Werner 09:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A350-941 MSN002 takeoff at ILA 2016. --Julian Herzog 08:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dllu 09:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A350-941 MSN002 takeoff at ILA 2016. --Julian Herzog 08:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A350-941 MSN002 takeoff at ILA 2016. --Julian Herzog 08:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The San Francisco 4th and King Street Station as seen from the I-280 highway. --Dllu 07:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Walking around Lago di Pian Palù (1800 m). in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking around Lago di Pian Palù (1800 m). in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Hikers taking in the vast Arctic wilderness of Canada's Ivvavik National Park --Daniel Case 05:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The group does not look very cheerful, but they look good on the picture in a beautiful landscape.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM insurance, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM insurance, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LVM insurance, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the sculpture “Body and Soul” (Duk-Kyu Ryang, 2015) in front of the office building of the LVM, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commemorative stone (1775) for St. Simeon, Simeonstift, Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 22:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of St. Roch in Stara Łomnica 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of St. Roch in Stara Łomnica 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spillway tower at the castle pond and pointed arch portal with merlons at castle Frauenstein, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --A.Savin 11:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taylor Cloy Morris beim Rennrodeln-Weltcup der Herren in Oberhof 2017 --Sandro Halank 20:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me -- Spurzem 17:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bengali style crumb fried fish rolls. The stuffing has an outer layer of fish with spicy onion masala inside. --Sumitsurai 17:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline WB off ... was this shot under fluorescent lights? --Daniel Case 21:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larnaca: airport, duty-free zone --A.Savin 17:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good take on something not usually considered photogenic --Daniel Case 21:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rijn canal, Leiden. --C messier 12:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Reasonably good cloudy-day scene --Daniel Case 21:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay. Downtown Core, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 17:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough for me for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mathematical object for illustrating Chladni figures on display at Matemateca IME-USP, by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton --Leandroxavier 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mathematical object for illustrating Chladni figures on display at Matemateca IME-USP, by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton --Leandroxavier 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Luth --IssamBarhoumi 13:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Viole d'Amour --IssamBarhoumi 13:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rebab --IssamBarhoumi 13:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
Consensual review
[edit]File:Westpoort Amsterdam 6674.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Westpoort, Amsterdam. --C messier 12:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, noisy and the fog ruins the picture --Ezarate 19:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Denoised, new curves, but it was hazy. --C messier 13:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 10:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The chroma noise is obviously seen in the dark areas (container yard in the foreground, dark roofs at the right side of the picture, the ship with the inscription TORM, and some other areas). Try to remove only the chroma noise (this doesn’t affect sharpness significantly), but I doubt about results for there are some other issues: for example, artifacts of oversharping can be found even now, sperical tanks has visible CAs... Dmitry Ivanov 17:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC).
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 23:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Khirokitia near Larnaca 01-2017 img4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Archaeological site of Khirokitia near Larnaca --A.Savin 01:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Oppose 1) The shed (roof) is a significant part of the composition, it is the detail attracting viewers’ attention. At the same time the right part of the shed is obviously unsharp (see an image note) 2) The dark shadow under the shed is rather vast. This could be considered as negligible for QI, but the shadow is very noisy (both luminance and chroma noise is visible). 3) The lights on stones tend to overexposure, a significant part of details in lights is obviously lost. In whole, the light condition don’t favour this scene, shadows/lights are very harsh. 4) Blue (violet) CAs are visible (they are minor, though; see notes). Dmitry Ivanov 18:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC).- Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 22:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC).
- Support OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 01:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality IMO.--Ermell 20:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 14:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Airbus_A350-941_F-WWCF_MSN002_ILA_Berlin_2016_19.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Airbus A350-941 MSN002 at ILA 2016. --Julian Herzog 13:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality and nice one. Possible FP IMO. Very detailed and well composed. --Code 15:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm afraid I don't agree; the sharpness and light are excellent, but I have a problem with the composition. Half the plane is cut out; wing, tail and more.--Peulle 22:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I also have a problem with the composition, the crop is not really well done --Michielverbeek 06:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support I disagree with the opposers, as what makes the composition, the front part of the airplane isn't badly cropped, eg. the engines are not cut off, the wheels are not cut. --C messier 13:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very good --Christian Ferrer 16:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, fresh and interesting composition. Dmitry Ivanov 17:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC).
- Oppose The composition isn´t working for me. --Milseburg 21:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and very good shot. -- Spurzem 22:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Ezarate 18:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
File:VDNKh Pavilion No 18 Republic of Belarus.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Moscow. VDNKh. Pavilion No. 18 Republic of Belarus. --Dmitry Ivanov 11:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, but it is too soft. --A.Savin 16:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I am not quite sure about your verdict. Shadows are really rather soft, but, I think, in acceptable borders (I suppose, there are positive moments in this softness in shadows: it gives some pseudo-three-dimensionality to the picture, makes it more “real”); and the lights of the building are sharp enough. Let’s discuss the photo. Dmitry Ivanov 18:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for me. I see no lack. The composition is o. k. too. -- Spurzem 22:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The statue on top is too unsharp IMO.--Ermell 10:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. As of sharpness of the figure’s surface. The statue is covered with golden smalt, and it is rather difficult to see sharp, clear lines on this sculpture. The depicting of this glittering, playing in sunlight surface of the figure is quite natural. As of sharpness of the outline of the figure. Strictly speaking, it is satisfactory at 100%. But if you doubt, please upload the image and examine it at 800% or more (when separate pixels are seen). You can easily see that the width of the transitional zone between the brown sculpture and the blue sky is 1...2, pixels, maybe, in some, not vast, areas 3 pixels. Not so bad, I think. Dmitry Ivanov 16:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC).
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 14:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC))
File:Via_Telemaco_Signorini1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Via Telemaco Signorini, Riomaggiore. --СССР 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose CA, unsharp, too dark --Jacek Halicki 00:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Support --Jacek Halicki 22:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)- Info Thank you for the review. Johann Jaritz was very kind to upload an improved version --СССР 04:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. Done @Jacek Halicki: Please, take another look at the image now. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support - The roof of the building on the left side is a bit soft, but overall, the picture looks fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--Ermell 11:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose IMHO, too blueish. --C messier 12:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 17:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)