Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 11 2016

• 
  • Nomination Shop in the April 9th 1947 Square, Tangier, Morocco --Poco a poco 02:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chipiona Lighthouse, Spain --Poco a poco 02:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sympetrum sp. --SilviaCoimbra 00:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów 5 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria --Hubertl 23:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Maybe you should correct exposure by +0.25 EV, to use the complete dynamic range available. --Rftblr 00:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Fixed, thanks, Rftblr --Hubertl 02:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Poseidon tabernacle at the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria --Hubertl 23:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Back of Athena, Main figure (Johannes Benk) at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna --Hubertl 23:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The DC Tower 1 in Vienna from the south on March 10, 2015. --Rftblr 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Saturn Tower in Vienna from the West on August 22, 2014. --Rftblr 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Saturn Tower from the South on August 22, 2014. --Rftblr 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Holy Trinity column in Neunkirchen, Lower Austria from South East on February 14th, 2015. --Rftblr 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Donau-City, Vienna from the South on March 10, 2015. --Rftblr 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anamorphic words in Maruanas, El Carpio. Cordoba, Spain. --ElBute 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Nice idea, well made! --Hubertl 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) at the Hawk Conservancy Trust in Andover, England. --Lewis Hulbert 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
    --Famberhorst 16:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White Wagtail in Sakai, Osaka. --Laitche 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. FP --Hubertl 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment OK, I nominated it. Thanks Hubertl :) --Laitche 16:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neoclassical house in Plaka, Athens. --C messier 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mnisikleous street, Plaka, Athens. --C messier 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alley in Anafiotika, Athens. --C messier 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Antinoos, AM Chalkida. --C messier 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Varied tit at Tennōji Park in Osaka. --Laitche 13:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Maybe a bit too noisy, elsewhere good. --C messier 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daurian redstart at Daisen Park in Osaka. --Laitche 13:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 'Dead' letter-box --F. Riedelio 13:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sandstone letter-box --F. Riedelio 13:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historical postal mailbox made of cast iron. --F. Riedelio 13:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. But the mailbox is a replica. -- Spurzem 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taxus baccata (European yew) in the hotel gardens Les Pagodes de Beauval to Seigy, France. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support DOF could be a bit more, but still good enough. --C messier 14:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• * Nomination Green Soldier from Toy Story at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Laitche 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination Green Soldier from Toy Story at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Laitche 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fossil diatom Frustule triceratium (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 12:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dinteranthus microspermus (by Anatoly Mikhaltsov). Kruusamägi 12:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 13:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Japanese pygmy woodpecker. --Laitche 12:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 17:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slovenia, Ljubljana, Urbanc House at Prešeren Square --Berthold Werner 12:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion The picture above could have been sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palácio do Planalto, seat of the Brazilian Federal Executive. By User:Jota Richter --Rodrigo.Argenton 09:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bomag BW 213 PDH road roller --Ermell 08:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Construction of Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Ebing --Ermell 08:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway from Triptis to Marxgrün --Ermell 08:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baptismal font in the church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 08:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glass window in the church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 08:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baumanskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pushkinskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Transitional Corridor between Ploshchad Revolyutsii and Teatralnaya Stations of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Restored wound from damage caused by an agricultural implement. Oak (Quercus robur). Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst.
    --Famberhorst 07:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice! And good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination fruits and seeds of woodland tulip - Fruits et graines de Tulipe des bois, Tulipe sauvage --Ercé 06:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination fruits and seeds of black-cumin - Fruits et graines de Nigelle cultivée --Ercé 06:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall at night, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the Hugo-Preuss Bridge towards Gustav Heinemann Bridge in Berlin-Mitte during the blue hour. --Code 05:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Coursan, Aude, France.] --Christian Ferrer 05:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination At dawn in the harbour of Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 05:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Auto rickshaw near Sipán, Peru --Bgag 04:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of Huaca Rajada, Peru --Bgag 04:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside chapel and manor Ehrenbichl on Ehrenbichlweg #31, district Woelfnitz, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rey-Stolle house, in Coea, Castro de Rei --Banjo 22:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Details missing (JPEG artifacts), perspective correction necessary. --XRay 06:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West wing of the former cloister in Klosterbeuren. North west side --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West wing of the former cloister in Klosterbeuren. West side --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment IMO perspective correctio necessary. The building is leaning in. --XRay 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Rotate and straightening done.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 09:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
     Support OK now. --XRay 12:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Viktorias at the main risalit --Hubertl 21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria, tabernacle (roof) --Hubertl 21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pneumatic waste collection in Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Valchillon train station in the surroundings of Cordoba, Spain. Nowadays it is closed but trains traverse it to and from Cordoba every day. --ElBute 14:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn magenta Ca. Wrong camera settings, only some gravels in the foreground are sharp. It is nonsense to work with 1/1600s f/2.8 for such a motif. --Cccefalon 21:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination Certainly, wrong camera settings. Some elements are not sharp enough. Thanks. --ElBute 18:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View Val Gardena in South Tyrol from the Saslong ski run. --Moroder 10:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Overall very good quality. There are minor blurred areas in the trees below. --Milseburg 14:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at The Trocadéro, site of the Palais de Chaillot, is an area of Paris, France --Rijinatwiki 09:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 18:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman quarry Kriemhildenstuhl. --F. Riedelio 08:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Would be interesting to know which camera(s) you use? --Moroder 14:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    @Moroder:
    As you can see in the Hidden categories I use a Canon EOS 7D with the lens Tamron SP AF 24–70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD. The metadata is unknowingly altered. --F. Riedelio 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The John Fitzgerald Kennedy Memorial in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 19:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality:Converging vertical lines, disturbing shadow on the lower right corner. --F. Riedelio 11:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The John Neely Bryan Cabin replica in Founders Plaza in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 19:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: Left and right area unsharp, tilt to the right. --F. Riedelio 11:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The John Neely Bryan Cabin replica in Founders Plaza in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 19:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Lacking detail. Excessive noise removal? --Lewis Hulbert 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bildstock 2 von 4 eines ehemaligen Kreuzwegs in Velen. By User:Rwgwiki --XRay 18:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality;--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman quarry Kriemhildenstuhl --F. Riedelio 16:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main organ in the Cathedral Church of St. Maria and St. Stephan. --F. Riedelio 16:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not sharp enough (especially at the top). --C messier 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
    --Famberhorst 16:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: Background not sharp. Suggestion: Move the text 'Locatie, Diakonieven...' to 'description`'. --F. Riedelio 08:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    Question: What do you mean with your suggestion?--Famberhorst 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    Answer: I think it would be clearer if the text would be not below but within 'Summary' under 'Description'. --F. Riedelio 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    Okay thanks.--Famberhorst 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral Church of St. Maria and St. Stephan. --F. Riedelio 10:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion Vertical banding on sky; probably needs redevelopment --A.Savin 12:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
     Done
    Redeveloped version uploaded, hope it's better. --F. Riedelio 15:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
    Sorry not better afaics --A.Savin 21:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
     Done
    New version: Noise in the sky removed. --F. Riedelio 17:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now --A.Savin 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Church at "Nativity of the Mother of God" Monastery in Botevgrad, Bulgaria. --Exonie 17:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Review Please apply perspective correction --Cccefalon 05:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
     Done
    Updated with perspective correction. What about now? --Exonie 16:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baden-Baden: former railway station at night --A.Savin 13:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment IMHO, the shadows are way too dark. Fixable? --C messier 22:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Not done --C messier 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Donau_City_Vienna_from_Donaupark_on_2014-08-08_crop.png

• Nomination The Donau City as seen from the Donaupark on August 8, 2014 (beschnittene Version). --Rftblr 17:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. In the description is English and German confused. --F. Riedelio 08:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
    •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --User:rftblr 19:36, 8 February 2016(UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mischek_Tower_Vienna_from_N_on_2014-08-22.png

• Nomination The Mischek Tower from the North on August 22, 2014. --Rftblr 17:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
• {{o}} Insufficient quality: Perspective correction necessary. --F. Riedelio 08:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This has been perspectively corrected, but a full correction will make this image seem top heavy (see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/Mischek%20Tower%20top%20heavy.jpg) , so I opted for a slight undercorrection.--Rftblr 11:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    
  • @Rftblr: Perspective correction is OK now. The file format should be changed to .jpg, the commonly used file type for digital images (.png ist made for raster graphics).
•  Support Perspective distortion is ok like this, IMO --Hubertl 08:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --User:rftblr 19:36, 8 February 2016(UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Tech_Gate_Vienna_from_W_on_2015-08-31.png

• Nomination The Tech Gate in Vienna from the west on August 31, 2015. --Rftblr 17:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support An interesting composition of modern architecture which is sharp enough to be a Q1one --Michielverbeek 20:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
  • •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --User:rftblr 19:36, 8 February 2016(UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Hermit_Ibis_in_Vienna_Zoo_on_2013-05-14.png

• Nomination A Hermin Ibis in the Vienna Zoo on May 14, 2013. --Rftblr 17:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Animal centered and in focus --Daniel Case 18:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
    •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --Rftblr 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mischek_Tower_Vienna_from_W_on_2013-06-14.png

• Nomination The Mischek Tower in Vienna from the west on June 14, 2013. --Rftblr 17:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good angle; nice and sharp --Daniel Case 18:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
    •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment What's wrong with PNG? Same colour depth possible, and used (24 bit/pixel), no (additional) compression artifacts. Ok, bigger file size than comparable JPG, and no EXIF data, but I didn't know lossy compression and exif are mandantory. -- Smial 12:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Ps: I'd suggest very slight clockwise rotation.

Read here. Common practice on Commons: JPG for photos, PNG/SVG for graphics. PNG -> no gain of quality. A truly lossless format is TIFF, with file size of 50-60 MB and more. --A.Savin 16:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

• • • •  Comment PNG is also lossless. The problem is not PNG but the way wikimedia treats it. If JPG is a requirement for photos, it would be helpful for newcomers to mention this in Commons:Image guidelines. --Rftblr 20:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 Comment PNG is lossless. And as long as you do not use lossless JPG, it has allways quality gain (at least for pixelpeepers) compared to JPG, because you have no compression artifacts. If the wikimedia implementation of the converting tool is not able (or disabled intentionally) to generate jpg thumbs, this can not be a reason to decline an image here. There is no QIC rule given. -- Smial 22:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version (which was slightly rotated clockwise). --Rftblr 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support both jpg and png. -- Smial 22:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Donau_City_Vienna_from_Donauinsel_on_2014-08-28.png

• Nomination The Donau City in Vienna as seen from the Donauinsel on August 28, 2014. --Rftblr 17:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good image of an eminently photogenic set of buildings --Daniel Case 18:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)

--Hubertl 10:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Hubertl 08:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Hubertl 10:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --Rftblr 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Smial 22:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:DC Tower 1 Vienna from SSW on 2013-09-24 perspective controlled.png

• Nomination DC Tower 1 in Vienna, nearly completed from south-west on September 24, 2013 (perspective controlled). --Rftblr 17:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Nice golden hour shot --Daniel Case 18:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Wrong format: photos should be jp(e)g, not PNG --A.Savin 23:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  
  •  Comment This batch of photos is my first nomination to QI, I checked them according to the Commons:Image guidelines. If jp(e)g is a requirement for quality photos, why is this not stated there? If it is necessary I will of course retract these nominations, make jpg versions, and make new nominations. --User:rftblr 7:25, 8 February 2016(UTC)
    •  Comment add a jpg for previewing purposes. rftblr --Hubertl 08:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 10:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I have now uploaded a JPG version and linked it to the PNG version. --Rftblr 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Smial 22:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg

• Nomination Panoramic view from Bürgerturm Gotha near Gotha in Thuringia. --Milseburg 15:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose The white spots (especially in the lower right corner of the image) should be removed. Otherwise grand panorama. --F. Riedelio 15:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info I´ve uploaded an improved version. But I believe that your "white spots" are nothing unnatural. Just light on the leaves. --Milseburg 17:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment The improved version is not really better. The white dots still remain and look unnatural IMHO. --F. Riedelio 15:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support IMO, this white dots are the result of not using a polarize filter, which often occurs with leave surfaces reflecting sunlight. Though for me QI. --Hubertl 19:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info I restored the more authentic original version! --Milseburg 02:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)