Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 10 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2015_09_08_022_Abriss_Tortenschachtel.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Construction worker squirts water for the reduction of the formation of dust at demolition work. --F. Riedelio 14:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment The crop on the left is disturbing imo. --Moroder 18:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    • ✓ Done
      New version with changed image cropping uploaded. --F. Riedelio 13:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment At the moment the compo is messed up by an inappropriate image ratio and disturbing elements. I made a combined crop&clone-out proposal to salvage the motif. --Cccefalon 08:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
      •  Support The new crop is convincing - the construction worker is now the necessary eye catcher among the assortment of different ragged elements with different directional lines. What you could do for further improvement is a slight untilt for the background verticals. --Cccefalon 10:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 11:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 09:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Metro_MSK_Line9_Savyolovskaya_(img1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Savyolovskaya Station of Moscow Subway --Florstein 07:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry image, probably focus error. --Shansov.net 12:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me -- Spurzem 18:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low DOF, somewhat too noisy. -- Smial 15:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per other opposers.--Jebulon 14:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)